Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOJ letter to NCAA: ‘Why does FBS not have a playoff?’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:00 PM
Original message
DOJ letter to NCAA: ‘Why does FBS not have a playoff?’
Edited on Wed May-04-11 08:09 PM by JonLP24
<snip>

In a letter to NCAA president Mark Emmert — and cc’d to BcS
Executive Director/spinmeister Bill Hancock — Assistant
Attorney General Christine Varney  writes that “[s]erious
questions continue to arise suggesting that the current Bowl
Championship Series (DCS) system may not be conducted
consistent with the competition principles expressed in the
federal antitrust laws.”  Varney cites Utah’s attorney
general’s intentions to file an antitrust suit as well as a
request to open an investigation of the BCS from a group of
twenty-one professors before getting to the heart of the
matter.

Why the hell does almost every other NCAA sport — including
all other levels of football — have a playoff and Div. 1-A
doesn’t?

    On March 2,2011, the New York Times reported that the
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was “willing
to help create a playoff format to decide a national
championship for the top level of college football.” In that
context, it would be helpful for us to understand your views
and/or plans on the following:

    1. Why does the Football Bowl Subdivision not have a
playoff, when so many other NCAA sports have NCAA-run playoffs
or championships?
    2. What steps, i f any, has the NCAA taken to create a
playoff among Football Bowl Subdivision programs before or
during your tenure? To the extent any steps were taken, why
were they not successful? What steps does the NCAA plan to
take to create a playoff at this time?
    3. Have you determined that there are aspects of the BCS
system that do not serve the interests of fans, colleges,
universities, and players? To what extent could an alternative
system better serve those interests?


http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/04/doj-letter-to-ncaa-why-does-fbs-not-have-a-playoff/related

I posted in GD because it involves the Assistant Attorney
General of Antitrust at the US Department of Justice. Didn't
post in LBN because it involves sports(it may have already
been posted).

(Just copy & paste link unless you all don't mind if I add
an S?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Check your tags...
everything is in strikethrough font.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe it was all deleted before it was sent...
:rofl:

I'm struck by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think that's the BCS crossing every relevant point out, Sid.
Nothing to look at here. It's going to take an act of God for the BCS to go to a play-off format. Even though more $$$$ are proven to be at stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I see why
This part

“[s]erious questions continue to arise suggesting that the
current Bowl Championship Series (DCS) system may not be
conducted consistent with the competition principles expressed
in the federal antitrust laws.” 

It is the [s].

I wanted to put the letter in italics like the article but
I'll just put it all on plain text mode. Would add an S myself
but don't really want to change the way the article was
written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good to know we have the DOJ on top of the big stuff nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. and they ignore the little crap like the banksters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC