Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are all trial lawyers good? Really?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:45 PM
Original message
Are all trial lawyers good? Really?
We have been trying to look for the reasons that we never seem to get ahead, the places where we continually get sold out and there's one that exists right under your nose. Campaign Donors with deep pockets, who also have the ability to skirt the laws politically to benefit their clients. Who are they? trial lawyers.

I don't wish to bismirch all those good lawyers out there who are everything they appear to be, (Erin Brockovich, you rule!) but I'm trying to open your eyes to see a big problem in the Dem party.

Not every trial lawyer deserves your loyalty. If you agree, please check into the link below and kick, since there has been an attempt all morning to bury it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1119084
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Trial Lawyers are people
Some are good, some are bad, and yet some cheat on their wife, dying of cancer, with some hack videographer. Not that I'm speaking of anyone specifically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And when they clan together, hiding their or their clients misdeeds behind
confidentiality clauses, that makes them just as bad as Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Especially when they promise a private Dave Matthews concert to their betrothed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Confidentiality clauses are usually imposed by the defendants
You're aware of that, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Actually, that makes things even clearer.
You might say, the defendants tried to make the case that the plaintiff requested the confidentiality clause. Thanks for another piece of the puzzle! The lawyers were the defendants. Need I say more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Scalia wrote a decision stating that attorneys are bound by
their duty of confidentiality to their clients until everyone is dead.

That is the law. It's not the attorney's choice. It is an old, old tenet in English/American law.

Sorry for you, but don't blame the attorney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. How far can they go to protect that confidentiality clause?
Does it also mean hiding their conflicts of interest? Is that acceptable? At what point does it become fraud if they do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Ironically, you probably need to ask a lawyer about the specific facts
of your situation. Sorry. I can say something general, but I can't answer your question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. What are the prongs for fraud?
Surely, that would be an easy answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Look it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Is there a difference for Civil fraud and Criminal fraud?
And what would be the source book? This isn't my forte. Who knew that taking a Criminal Law class would have been helpful BEFORE becoming a resident of FLorida?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Call your local library and, if they don't have helpful books,
ask whether there is a law library at a nearby university or area around the court. There are special law librarians. You can do a little research online just for basic definitions. It's complicated. That's why lawyers charge to represent clients. Not only do they have to go to law school and take a bar examination that, at least in California, is very competitive, but, throughout their careers, they have to study and read the law.

You may not like lawyers, but they don't have an easy job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I love lawyers.
Except for the dishonest, crooked, liars, deceivers, arrogant pricks in the profession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Yeah, you need to say more
Because I'm not understanding. "Trial lawyers" is the usual appellation for personal injury attorneys and other attorneys who bring actions for torts against corporations for civil wrongs. "Defense lawyers" is the profession's term for the attorneys hired by the insurance companies (or the self-insured corporation) to defend a corporation from allegations of wrong-doing.

When a case is settled out of court without a trial, the settlement agreement often has a confidentiality clause that prevents a party from disclosing anything other than the fact that a mutually agreed settlement was reached between the parties. Defendants will usually not settle a claim without a confidentiality clause. Oftentimes a plaintiff (that is, the party seeking relief) will agree to the confidentiality clause in order to avoid the time, expense and uncertainty of going to trial. Settlements often include a disclaimer of fault or liability as well, allowing the defendant to avoid an admission of wrongdoing in exchange for settling the case. The way to avoide confidentiality clauses and disclaimers of liability is to proceed to trial and get a verdict on the court docket, which is a public record. Since both sides agree to the settlement, it could be said that both sides requested or agreed to a confidentiality clause. Is there a reason it makes a difference in the particular case you're not talking about?

In the case of a lawyer being sued for malpractice or other tort, laws and state bar association rules vary from state to state. If you think that lawyers in your state are getting too free a ride for failing to adhere to the highest professional standards, I'd suggest getting in touch with your state's bar association. In the state I'm familiar with, there is a Board of Governors that sets professional and ethical standards for all attorneys licensed in the state, and there is a citizen seat on that Board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Lawyers have a duty of confidentiality to ever client.
They write confidentiality clauses for their clients.

Are you complaining about lawyers who invoke their duty of confidentiality to their clients? Or are you complaining about lawyers who write confidentiality clauses into contracts their clients use?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. What if those clients are other lawyers?
And what if they may have had a secondary involvement in the tort?

And what if they criss-cross with professional courtesies to protect each other's back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Trial lawyers represent the average guy
Big law firms represent money. That is the bottom line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. So what do you call a big law firm of trial lawyers?
What wordage is necessary to get through? Are trial lawyers a sacred cow for Democrats because they tend to be big campaign donors for Dem causes? You tell me how to get through to open people's eyes so they can see how it is that our world became so upside down? Why would it surprise people in DU to realize that the blame would be some sacred cow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. you don't have any idea what you are talking about n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I'm sure that Valerie Plame and Sybil Edmonds heard the same thing.
So, since you know all, what are the prongs for fraud?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. If I could trake you to the side and under confidentiality
I could tell you things that would shock you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I don't doubt it for a minute. Hence, the reason why I'm going after
the lawyers because issues that affect the public interest, should not be allowed to be put under a confidentiality clause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Depends on the trial lawyer.
They are usually much smarter than even the average lawyer, quick on their feet, logical in their thinking and good with words.

But trial lawyers take all sides. They prosecute and they defend. And, surprise: Most of the trial lawyers I have known were conservative Republicans.

I think you are really talking about Plaintiff's lawyers -- lawyers represent ordinary people in claims against corporations. They do a necessary, very difficult job.

And if they are generous to the Democratic Party, my advice is: Don't look a gift-horse in the mouth.

Better to take money from trial lawyers than from Wall Street gamblers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I think the problem is, that people can't really comprehend the damage
they're capable of inflicting in a community. They may not be responsible for the good ole boy networks that cause great chaos, but they sure do know how to legitimize the behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Erin Brockovich isn't a lawyer
Edited on Tue May-17-11 04:29 PM by DefenseLawyer
but she does rule. That said, I'm not a civil lawyer, I've been a criminal defense lawyer for all of my 17 years of practice and we are used to being the black sheep of the legal community, and while plaintiff's lawyers often get a similar bad rap, they do far more good than bad. Without them average people would routinely be crushed by anyone with money that wronged them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. She never got her law degree?
That is some serious paralegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Isn't she one now?
I seem to remember reading something that she got into that field after her famous case. I'm probably completely wrong though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Ding ding ding- we have a winner
You got it. People have no idea how big the big firms are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. What is your definition of "trial lawyer"?
What is your definition of "confidentiality clause"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Definitions:
Trial Lawyers: lawyers who sell themselves as lawyers for the common people.

Confidentiality Clause: An agreement between the plaintiff and defendants to keep the details of a Legal Complaint quiet. However, because the details are kept secret, people (including lawyers in the community) are allowed to spread disinformation, including the confusion of gag order vs. confidentiality clause. In addition, the mission to keep things quiet overrides everything, including due process of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Are all *anything* ___________ ?
No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
30. My opinion of many trial lawyers is summed up by the movie "Liar Liar"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC