Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pawlenty Will Be The Republican Nominee In 2012-

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 09:17 AM
Original message
Pawlenty Will Be The Republican Nominee In 2012-
Edited on Wed Jun-08-11 09:19 AM by KittyWampus
He bridges the gap between Tea Party nuts and Grover Norquist/Corporate Privatizers.

His personality is boring, but that's a plus.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think you're wrong.
It's still early, but if republicans want someone tolerable who's not a liability to explode, Pawlenty is their person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Every time I see him I think of that suasage commercial
"More Park sausages mom"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. I agree.
He's potentially a dangerous opponent... but certainly beatable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama would wipe the floor with this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChoppinBroccoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. I Still Say Romney, But It Wouldn't Surprise Me
It doesn't matter. I don't see any Republican capable of winning the nominaton who is capable of getting as many as 100 electoral votes. It's going to be 1996 all over again. They'll serve up a sacrificial lamb that will get slaughtered while they concentrate on 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. I say it will be Romney too. In fact, it should have been Romney
rather than McCain the first time around. I think they've learned their lesson and will go with Romney even if they have to pinch their noses shut to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. there's no such thing as "should have" in electoral politics. Romney didn't win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. I agree; it's time (for us) to stop focusing on the extreme nutjobs. There may be *just* enough
Edited on Wed Jun-08-11 10:25 AM by LeftinOH
cool heads in the GOP to put a "normal" candidate up against Obama. Although, he might be balanced out with a running mate who appeals to the base -like Bachmann or Santorum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Snerk, you said "bridges." I really don't see how someone can win with this hanging over his head:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. That doesn't matter one bit to the Repig primary
electorate. It might even be a badge of honor over in psychoworld.

TPTB know Timmeh the Tool is controllable, unlike Mooselini, Bachmann or the rest of the "light the nuclear fuse and bring back Jebus" brigade but I do agree a loony like Santorum would be his likely VP nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. "Controllable," now that I grant you. Very good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Bingo.
He's malleable enough for TPTB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catbyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. he's just despicable enough for the baggers
what with him blaming "class warfare" on Obama. Unbelievable. That statement coming after a decade of the largest looting of the economy in US history by the oligarchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Just another example of Big Government failing.
You and I know that's wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC