5. I Still Say Romney, But It Wouldn't Surprise Me
It doesn't matter. I don't see any Republican capable of winning the nominaton who is capable of getting as many as 100 electoral votes. It's going to be 1996 all over again. They'll serve up a sacrificial lamb that will get slaughtered while they concentrate on 2016.
11. I say it will be Romney too. In fact, it should have been Romney
rather than McCain the first time around. I think they've learned their lesson and will go with Romney even if they have to pinch their noses shut to do so.
6. I agree; it's time (for us) to stop focusing on the extreme nutjobs. There may be *just* enough
Edited on Wed Jun-08-11 10:25 AM by LeftinOH
cool heads in the GOP to put a "normal" candidate up against Obama. Although, he might be balanced out with a running mate who appeals to the base -like Bachmann or Santorum.
8. That doesn't matter one bit to the Repig primary
electorate. It might even be a badge of honor over in psychoworld.
TPTB know Timmeh the Tool is controllable, unlike Mooselini, Bachmann or the rest of the "light the nuclear fuse and bring back Jebus" brigade but I do agree a loony like Santorum would be his likely VP nominee.
what with him blaming "class warfare" on Obama. Unbelievable. That statement coming after a decade of the largest looting of the economy in US history by the oligarchy.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.