http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/06/12/hispanic.conservatives/As Republicans gear up for Monday's presidential debate in New Hampshire, some conservative Hispanics say they'll be watching closely -- and they're hoping to see more than the current field of candidates has offered so far.
San Francisco political consultant Alex Gonzalez, who has also joined the Tequila Party, said he hopes to support a Republican candidate who isn't intimidated by the Tea Party and has concrete plans for improving the nation's economy.
Maria de Lourdes Gonzalez Cosio, director of the Hispanic apostolate of the Roman Catholic diocese in Knoxville, said
she feels ashamed to be a Republican every time she hears a Republican candidate endorse anti-immigration laws."I would like the candidates to talk about the hostility GOP legislators have towards immigrants," Garcia Blase said.
"I see hypocrisy where GOP state legislators are implementing anti-immigrant laws all over the place, yet, they really don't want the president to take care of immigration reform that will benefit the American economy. I want to know how they will fix the broken immigration system."
Repubs have no desire to "fix the broken immigration system'. Their policy, exemplified in Arizona is "attrition through enforcement".
"Those three words, “attrition through enforcement,” make up a catchphrase of the the right-wing Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), Lemons points out. It essentially means, "make life so uncomfortable to immigrant population here that they'll leave."
"The intense Republican anti-immigrant rhetoric wasn't always so loud in Arizona, Lemons says. Immigration used to be a wedge issue for the party, as many of its members run businesses that rely on undocumented workers. "Republicans were not as nativist as they are now in the state," he says. But Lemons says there was an "ethnic McCarthyism" creeping into Arizona's Republican Party."
http://alibi.com/feature/32226/Climate-Check-Arizona.html
Attrition through enforcement is a wonderful strategy for the right. It appeals to the base's desire "to do something directly to the 'bad guys'" while preserving a large pool of easily exploitable workers. We have seen that increased enforcement doesn't send many people "home" (they know what awaits them at home), it just drives them deeper underground and makes them even more exploitable. The repubs' base is happy, the repubs' unscrupulous employers are happy; it's a win-win for the GOP.