Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times Editorial: The FAA, After the Republicans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:28 AM
Original message
NY Times Editorial: The FAA, After the Republicans
The FAA, After the Republicans


snip

Republicans, who are experts at such maneuvers, have been holding the reauthorization of the F.A.A. hostage for months, trying to get Democrats in the Senate to agree to weaken transportation workers’ rights.

The tale, like so much in Washington, is a convoluted one, but it comes down to this: Last year, the National Mediation Board changed a rule to make it easier for airline and railroad workers to unionize with a straight majority vote. At the behest of the airlines, House Republicans inserted a provision in the F.A.A. reauthorization bill to undo the rule change. The Senate’s version kept the rule.

With the two chambers unable to agree, Congress would normally have passed a temporary extension for the F.A.A. (a routine vote that has happened 20 times since 2007). But, last month, the House Republicans inserted a provision to end $16.5 million in federal subsidies to keep airports open in 13 rural communities.

Both parties agree subsidies must be cut. But the list, Democrats note, was written in a way to hit airports in the states of prominent Senate Democrats, including Majority Leader Harry Reid. Representative John Mica, the chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, announced publicly that the subsidy issue was “just a tool” to get the Senate to give in on the union issue.

snip

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/04/opinion/the-faa-after-the-republicans.html?src=recg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KILL THE WISE ONE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. This would be a good time for POTUS to use the Bully Pulpit
Why does this man, who is a good public speaker, not use the Bully Pulpit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He is a coward
He has the power and yet chooses not to intervene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. But that wouldn't look bipartisan - or if he did call out the problems, he'd still share
the blame by saying all of them in DC were at fault.

So on one hand, we've got Fair and Balanced Faux news who can only make it look like the Dems fault - and POTUS who can't seem to not resist blaming the Dems along with the Pugs at every opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. There's a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. for now, but key issues remain
"The agreement does not address differences over labor issues that Senate Democrats said were the real reason that Republicans were trying to press for the cuts to rural air service. Democrats had embraced some of those changes in their own long-term F.A.A. reauthorization bill, which was passed earlier this year by the Senate.

The House also passed a long-term F.A.A. bill that included a measure to repeal a rule of the National Mediation Board, which oversees union and labor issues in the airline and railroad industries. The new rule, which passed after President Obama appointed two of the board’s three members, reversed a 76-year-old rule and made it easier for unions to win a representation election. Under the old rule, workers who did not vote were counted as “no” votes; under the new rule, only those casting ballots were counted."

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/05/business/reid-says-deal-has-been-reached-to-reopen-faa.html?hpw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC