Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flashback: Senators Confirm Medicare Buy-In As Part Of A Public Option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 06:46 AM
Original message
Flashback: Senators Confirm Medicare Buy-In As Part Of A Public Option
Sorry, just reminiscing about what might have been...and this was less than two years ago. Now our party leadership proposes to "reform" Medicare. Sad.
------

A number of key Senators--including Chuck Schumer (D-NY), John Kerry (D-MA), and Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) confirmed today that a Medicare buy-in is being discussed as an option as part of a grand compromise on a public option.

"It's an option, it's being discussed, it does have some issues that are being raised, but it remains--it's on the table," Kerry told reporters.

The idea was introduced to the discussion by Rockefeller, who told reporters that it's still unclear whether it would ultimately be a replacement for the public option.

"I think that's one of the reasons it was brought up, but you don't do everything in juxtaposition with something else always."

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/key-senators-confirm-medicare-buy-in-as-part-of-a-public-option-compromise.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. And with the added advantage that it isn't unconstitutional. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, but if they'd tried that the R's would've called Obama a Socialist. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It was smart to appease them, They never dared call him that after he knelt before them.. Oh wait
they still did.
Who knew that Newt's old health deform ideas of the 90's that many knew were horrible at the time became the goal of the Democrats, and who knew that the further privitization of profit from our pain would now become Socialist when a socialist would have taken out the pain and death profit parts, socialists have changed as much as Democrats I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The DLC and other right-wing infiltration of the Democratic Party was very ...
...successful for them and disastrous for the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. What s a Medicare buy in??
Or, I should say, what is their definition of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. See 8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Average folk buying into the Medicare program at cost...
as a substitute for conventional insurance.

Big Insurance wouldn't stand a chance. Austerity would be forced upon them, and they'd have to shrink like crazy to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KILL THE WISE ONE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I would be happy to buy in at cost, PLUS a reasonable 10%
I suspect there must be a large group of people like me.
This would be the best way to make medicare more solvent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I'd have to agree with that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, it is an example of just how far we have digressed in 3 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. What passed was the most that was going to be able to pass...
With a public option, it would've never made it through congress.


That's what people still don't get. It barely made it through congress as it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Exactly correct ... I always ask folks this challange question ...
First some set up.

We all know that there were 5 or 6 blue dogs, and then every GOP member, and they were going to vote NO on a public option.

But let's pretend. Let's imagine that somehow (we'll ignore how), Obama gets 5 of the 6 bluedogs to agree. He only needs one more.

And that last one is Joe "the Senator from Aetna" Lieberman.

The challenge question ... "What SPECIFICALLY does Obama do to flip Lieberman to a yes?"

When answering make sure to be aware of 2 key points.

1) Lieberman campaigned against Obama and actively supported McCain in the 2008 election.
2) Lieberman doesn't plan to run for re-election.

I ask this question regularly, and so far these are the best answers.

1) Use the DOJ to blackmail him. This was a serious suggestion.
2) Threaten to cut aid to Israel. Which fails because other Dem senators would never go along with that.
3) Threaten to take government contracts from Connecticut. Which fails because Lieberman isn't running again. He doesn't care if Obama does that, and in the end, it only hurts Obama with the people of Connecticut.

The reality is Obama had zero leverage over Lieberman. Joe has a sweet deal already lined up for when he leaves office, and he's not going to do anything to jeopardize that.

And as you correctly note, folks don't get it. They seem to be unable to do the math needed to count the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. He didn't need the last 5 or 6 Democratic votes or Lieberman. 50 in the Senate is all it required.
There were 58 Democratic Senators (59 at times) counting Independent Bernie Sanders who caucused with the Democrats. They needed just 50 votes since a reconciliation process bill cannot be filibustered. So the last 5 or 6 Democrats and Lieberman were unnecessary and irrelevant. Put the blame where it belongs - the President with 49 Democrats + Sanders could have enacted a public option.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Don't mess with Obama's alibi, they all worked really hard on inventing it and it is all he has
Pointing out the back room deals he made or exposing the 50 vote requirement will hurt Obama's feelings and make baby Jesus cry.
Just leave him alone!! cry cry ..sob... he has no power at all and you are being mean to someone that is as weak as a little girl with no authority and no office.

You are just so fucking cruel!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. This would still put medicare on a more stable financial footing.
Just let anyone buy it as insurance through payroll.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. The sell-out on heathcare was a turning point - inaugerating attempts to destroy rather than expand


Medicare.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. So, you're admitting that you're dropping acid before you start these threads?
Well, color me surprised!


Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC