Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Has an Answer for Public Wrath: Eliminate Town Halls

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 05:40 AM
Original message
Congress Has an Answer for Public Wrath: Eliminate Town Halls
Or: What to do when the grass roots isn't astroturf anymore.

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/08/paul-ryan-congress-town-hall?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Motherjones%2Fmojoblog+%28MotherJones.com

Congress' approval rating—currently 13 percent, according to Gallup—is at a historic low, and its disapproval rating, at 84 percent, is at a historic high. Many Americans eagerly awaited Congress' August recess so they could use town hall meetings and other public appearances to give their elected officials a piece of their mind. There's just one problem: most of Congress isn't scheduling any town halls. None. Zilch.

The think tank No Labels called the offices of all 430 active members of Congress and found that 60 percent of them weren't scheduling town hall meetings. According to No Labels' analysis, more Democrats than Republicans are shutting themselves off from their constituents: 68 percent of Dems and 51 percent of Republicans hadn't planned a town hall during Congress' weeks-long summer break. (Click here to see if your representative or senator is planning a town hall or not.)

Not to be ignored, angry citizens, at least in one high profile district, have taken action to get some attention. Last week, a handful of unemployed constituents organized a sit-in in GOP Rep. Paul Ryan's office in Kenosha, Wisconsin, while 100 protesters picketed outside. Ryan in particular has drawn heaps of criticism for his plan to eliminate Medicare as we know it and refashion Medicaid into a state-based block grant program. In the end, Ryan's staff had police remove the protesters from the office, which was done peacefully.

Paul Ryan has made himself available during the recess—but for a price. That's right: Ryan and other lawmakers are now charging constituents to attend public events and ask them questions. Ryan wanted $15 a head. Rep. Dan Quayle (R-Ariz.), Politico reported, is charging $35 from attendees who want to ask him questions over a catered lunch at a Phoenix law firm. Rep. Chip Cravaack (R-Minn.) also wants money—$10 a person—to attend an his event, which is hosted by the National Federation of Independent Businesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Look for the Beltway Marauders to build a great wall around DC
just like they did along the southern border of the US.

This trend of denying the public access to their elected officials is not new. The government has become more and more inaccessible over the decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. These reps are getting a salary from the people and charging admission at the same time.
That doesn't seem kosher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. This seems like a good enought reason for the President to reconvene
congress, give them a good verbal thrashing, and have them go back to work.

Oh, wait, he's on a bus or at the Vineyard.

Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Silly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. You're right. Why ruin a perfectly good week at the beach. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Equally silly
Do you REALLY think that a presidential vacation is much like we others call a vaction? Or do you just enjoy silly sanrkiness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is the outcome of the Citizen's United decision.
Why would a sitting congress person spend even 5 minutes listening screaming people at a town hall, when in the same amount of time, they can learn which legislation to support, thus ensuring that a PR front company runs adds for them in their home state.

Its a no brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. How many of them usually schedule these events?
How do these numbers compare to last year? ... five years ago? Without some historical data, these numbers are meaningless.

I expect better reporting from MoJo than I'm seeing in this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Are real "town halls" even possible any more?
The concept of a "town hall" meeting is where citizens come together to discuss and debate matters with some degree of an open mind, presumably to achieve some kind of community consensus on future directions.

In the current setting, where all politics is hyper-partisan, and where communities are divided and polarized, people come to "town halls" not just with their own opinions, but with entirely different sets of "facts" to justify their opinions.

The modern "town hall" is where people come to read their manifestos and to make a public display of their ideology. As such, they are no longer particularly useful, so I can understand why Congressional reps are less than keen on holding them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. So Ryan, Quayle, and Cravaack are, of course, not accepting the taxpayer salary.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 08:08 AM by valerief
Because that salary is what pays them to take questions from his constituents. What? You say they're double-dipping? Well, isn't that just like a POS UCA (United Corps of America) pol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. To the wayside goes any charade of "representing" us.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 09:13 AM by woo me with science
They increasingly consider themselves owners of irritating serfs who get too loud, rather than our representatives.

Kicked and recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. I find it funny more Democrats than Republicans are shutting the doors and locking the gates.
What, have too many of them veered a little too far into center-right territory, and they know it's been pissing off core constituencies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Like all corporate entities, the Third Way manages its advertising very carefully.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 09:24 AM by woo me with science
And I think you are right that part of the problem is that too much of the Democratic constituency still expects a representative to represent.

When you claim to stand for one thing but actually pursue the opposite course of action, you are unlikely to select advertising venues that allow the public to respond to you directly.

And yes, one of the consequences of having a corporate party is that they will focus group, manipulate, and *advertise* to you, rather than trying to represent you.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1717174
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC