Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EaRThQuAKe epicenter next to NUKE PLANT!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:40 PM
Original message
EaRThQuAKe epicenter next to NUKE PLANT!
Where the quake hit http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Maps/US2/37.39.-79.-77.php

Where that is: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Lake+Anna,+VA&hl=en&sll=38.873561,-77.38986&sspn=0.103307,0.154324&vpsrc=0&z=11

Ranked 7th most vulnerable to earthquake http://www.nbc29.com/story/14265528/lake-anna-reactor-ranked-7th-most-at-risk-for-earthquake-damage

"According to Jim Norvelle with Dominion Power, North Anna was designed to withstand a magnitude 5.9 – 6.1 earthquake."

I got a bad feeling here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Heard that North Anna did its 'close down' thing, as intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. So Did Fukushima
In the hours after the 3/11 quake everybody was assured that Fukushima had safely shut down.
Later we learned that the quake had severely damaged it even before they ran out of power,
and it was already melting down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Well there was that whole 60' wall of water thing in Japan
Thats what actually caused most of the problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. A 6.1?
Are they nuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. ducking and covering
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. But it's ok to build nuke plants in seismic zones.
Just ask any Nukey. They'll tell you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not this shit again.
Funny how people go into panic mode when there's something, anything happening near a nuclear plant, but like those two that were in the middle of the mid-west flood zones, they conveniently forget as soon as the worries are proved groundless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Is Fukushima "This shit" too?
Or have you forgotten about the ongoing and ever worsening problem there? have you forgotten how the news seemingly forgot about that "Shit"????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Who the fuck forgot about it? Just because it proved to be ok doesn't
in any way take away the POTENTIAL danger! What about the next time? Or the time after that, when the goddamned thing, and every living thing nearby to it, goes NUCLEAR?

Jesus Christ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Actually Fuku is NOT ok
we are having a continuing (not covered in the US) disaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Not this shit again --> Funny how people go into panic mode
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 02:04 PM by stockholmer
:wtf: is your malfunction, Mr/Ms Wraith of Normalcy Bias Junction, USA?

cocksure till a brick drops on your own brain stem, eh?

keep on crackin' cynicism

one day your number will come up (caesium 137, perhaps)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Wraiths (and other Undead) Thrive on Radiation
Radiation may be deadly to living creatures, but the undead eat it for lunch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow. Scary, K&R. n/t
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 01:47 PM by myrna minx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Lake Anna isn't known for her tsunami. Chill. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. The meltdown at Fukushima began before the tsunami hit the plant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. There's no evidence of that at all. Sorry.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 02:29 PM by FBaggins
Internet conspiracy theories do not become proof just by repetition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. This report conflicts with your assertions
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Japan/MH12Dh01.html

Aug 12, 2011

What happened at Fukushima?

<snip>Kikuchi Yoichi, a former GE engineer who helped build the Fukushima nuclear power plant says unequivocally that, "the earthquake caused the meltdown not the tsunami.'' In his recent book Why I'm Against the Nuclear Plants I Helped Build, he explains that poorly maintained water pipes and circulation system failure were the cause of the triple meltdown:

''At Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, at first the plan was to use the water coffin approach. In other words, to fill the containment vessels with water and cool down the pressure vessel and ensure a safe and stable state. However, once (TEPCO) understood that the containment vessels had been damaged, they gave up this plan. Because water was probably leaking all over the place from the pipes, from the start this was an unreasonable scenario.''

Tanaka Mitsuhiko, a former nuclear power plant designer and science writer asserts that at least the Number One reactor melted down as a result of the earthquake damage. He describes it as a loss of coolant accident (LOCA). "The data that TEPCO has made public shows a huge loss of coolant within the first few hours of the earthquake. It can't be accounted for by the loss of electrical power. There was already so much damage to the cooling system that a meltdown was inevitable long before the tsunami arrived."

He says the released data shows that at 2:52 pm on March 11, before the tsunami had arrived, the emergency circulation equipment of both the A and B systems automatically started up. "This only happens when there is a loss of coolant." Between 3:04 pm and 3:11 pm the water sprayer inside the containment vessel was turned on. Tanaka says that it is an emergency measure only done when other cooling systems have failed.

By the time the tsunami arrived and knocked out all the electrical systems, circa 3:37 pm, the plant was already on its way to melting down.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. So does your earlier post. That doesn't make it so.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 03:56 PM by FBaggins
Those (unsupported) claims add up to nothing more than "there was damage before the tsunami hit". Reactors have been damaged many times in the past without melting down. It's nonsense to claim that because emergency cooling equipment was in use, that meant that the core would melt down even if power had not been lost.

There have also been a number of reports of workers stopping the cooling system in error multiple times prior to the tsunami hitting. The mere fact that something was off does not mean that an earthquake knocked it out and it would have been useless even without the tsunami.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think that may be a poorly worded statement; did the spokesman
mean "the plant is designed to withstand up to a 5.9", or did he mean "the plant is designed to withstand a 7.0, so a 5.9 should be no problem"?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. OMG WE'RE GONNA DIE!!!!!!!!!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. +1
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drew Richards Donating Member (507 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. And many of you here on DU shot me down and put my prediction thread in the crazy file...ha!
Ok so my entire prediction list is exactly one year and 4 days later from all the occurences in the last 6 months...I thought most of this would happen next year...

Spooky stuff.

http://drewrichards2000.newsvine.com/_news/2011/01/08/5793044-is-the-end-coming-but-they-dont-want-to-tell-us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. I could care less here in West Virginia...
I still have plenty of Duct Tape and cling wrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. Oh why worry? Who ever heard of an earthquake or tsunami damaging a nuke plant?
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC