Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quake sensors removed from around Virginia nuke plant due to budget cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Playinghardball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:01 PM
Original message
Quake sensors removed from around Virginia nuke plant due to budget cuts
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 03:36 PM by Playinghardball
Source: Raw Story
By David Edwards

A nuclear power plant that was shut down after an earthquake struck central Virginia Tuesday had seismographs removed in 1990s due to budget cuts.

U.S. nuclear officials said that the North Anna Power Station, which has two nuclear reactors, had lost offsite power and was using diesel generators to maintain cooling operations after an 5.9 earthquake hit the region.

The North Anna plant, which was near the epicenter of Tuesday's quake, is reportedly located on a fault line.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission rates the plant as the seventh most likely to receive core damage from a quake. But they say the chances of that are only 1 in 22,727.

More: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/23/virginia-nuclear-plant-had-quake-sensors-removed-due-to-budget-cuts/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's down to "meh" and "gosh darn it, that was a big one" ratings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. PWRs are especially dangerous, because if there is a leak somehow...
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 03:05 PM by originalpckelly
in the vessel maintaining the pressure in the reactor, then the water cooling it will quickly boil off. The water is generally more than twice the temperature needed to boil. Now, on the other hand, that also means that it will be harder for the reaction to keep going, because the reactor is moderated using the same water that boils off. It's a safety mechanism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because of "budget cuts"? Or, was it "profit margins"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. The sensors were installed/operated by the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Guess they better put them back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChandlerJr Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder how the plant knew to automaticly scram
without earthquake sensors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The software is designed to do that
and so far, it worked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChandlerJr Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So the software, absent any input from the removed sensors,
is designed to scram the reactors based on a WAG?

Now that's some really intelligent programming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. They still have internal senseors
and I will leave it at that...

By the way... translation to the crowd, WAG= Wild Ass Guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChandlerJr Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thank you for translating for me
sometimes I don't communicate clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. The sensors that were removed were installed/operated by Virginia Tech...
(Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) and were not involved in the plant's
operation. The seismographs removed would provide a recorded indication of how strong the quake
was at the plant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. How does the software know what to do without sensors to tell it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. The sensors that were removed were installed/operated by Virginia Tech...
(Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) were placed around the plant and were not
involved in the plant's operation. The seismographs removed would provide a recorded indication
of how strong the quake was at the plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ok at this point... I should be surprised how?
Nothing surprised me any more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. well that's because we never have any earthquakes around here
oh, wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC