Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sacramento to vote on crash tax for all out-of-towners, not just those at fault

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:17 AM
Original message
Sacramento to vote on crash tax for all out-of-towners, not just those at fault
Source: Sacramento Bee

Attention, out-of-towners: Getting into a crash in the city of Sacramento is about to get more expensive.

With a City Council vote scheduled for tonight, the city is on the verge of joining a growing list of California cities and fire districts that charge nonresidents hundreds of dollars when they're in a wreck that requires Sacramento Fire Department response.

... State Sen. Tony Strickland, R-Moorpark, has drafted legislation that would ban crash taxes in California, saying the fees represent another hit to already over-burdened taxpayers. Several states – including Florida, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Missouri – have banned the fees.

... Fees would be levied on all out-of-towners involved in crashes, not just on those who are at fault.

... While some insurance policies cover Fire Department costs, the typical auto policy in California does not, said Sam Sorich, president of the Association of California Insurance Companies. What's more, "if policies do start covering these instances, rates in an area where these fees are in effect are going to be adjusted (upward)," he said.

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/01/25/3348917/sacramento-city-council-to-vote.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. This shit should be outlawed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. That'll sure help tourism........
.....not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. As always, the elephant in the room is Prop 13. Fix that and these nickle and dime approaches
would be unnecessary. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC