Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NPR Criticizes House Plan to Slash Corporation for Public Broadcasting Funding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:07 PM
Original message
NPR Criticizes House Plan to Slash Corporation for Public Broadcasting Funding
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/npr-criticizes-house-plan-slash-98944

The elimination of organization’s federal subsidy would affect hundreds of local public radio stations.

NPR spoke out on Saturday about the House Appropriation Committee's proposal to eliminate the $531 million federal subsidy set aside for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
"The elimination of federal funding would be a significant blow to nearly 900 public radio stations that serve the needs of more than 38 million Americans with free over-the-air programming they can’t find anywhere else," said NPR CEO and President Vivian Schiller in a statement. "It would diminish stations' ability to bring high-quality local, national and international news to their communities, as well as local arts, music and cultural programming that other media don’t present."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. As much as I like NPR
it's not a worthwhile deal to be borrowing half a billion from China every year to run it, and continue to run up our debt service costs for it.

Given a choice of priorities... home heating for the poor >>>>> NPR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Government spending is only 2% of NPR's budget, it's news like PBS that need federal funding
Edited on Mon Feb-14-11 09:16 PM by ShadowLiberal
NPR has said previously that they could survive without federal funding, back when the neocons were mad at them for firing a guy for spewing their antiMuslim bigotry on other media channels while being identified as an NPR employee.

News outlets like PBS hopwever probably could not survive the blow of no federal funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. as I understand it it's the affiliate stations that require the subsidies
if government spending is only 2% of their budget the no-brainer decision is to cut costs by 2% and unleash themselves from all the government requirements - which would probably be a net revenue gain.

Doing the math... if $531M = 2%

That would be an annual total budget of over $26B... I'm pretty sure NPR is not spending anywhere near that kind of money even when you roll in all the affiliates.

When you count the entire network it's probably closer to 25-30% of the total operating costs being subsidized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1gobluedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. $531M is the total funding to CPB for all of public broadcasting
Which is primarily member stations, not NPR or PBS. 2% of NPR's budget comes from the CPB but it's nowhere near $531M. I run a mid-sized member station; our portion is $198K which we CANNOT afford to do without; it's 20% of our budget. You can learn more at www.170millionamericans.org.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let them get their cash..
... from corporations. They've already sold out their programming to them anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. America has a long distiguished history of doing things in a bad way.
We could have had BBC, but we got PBS and NPR. We could have had Bullet Trains, but we got Amtrak. And don't get me started on what passes for "Health Care" in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riftaxe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. NPR should just charge more for their commercials
Edited on Mon Feb-14-11 09:37 PM by Riftaxe
since it has long since forsaken being free from them.

On Edit: Maybe charge more for product advertisement instead of just shilling the corporation names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC