Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The New York Time's Journalistic OBEDIENCE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 07:18 PM
Original message
The New York Time's Journalistic OBEDIENCE
<>

In this Jan. 28, 2011 file photo, Pakistani security officials escort Raymond Allen Davis, a U.S. consulate employee, center, to a local court in Lahore, Pakistan.



:smoke: :smoke: :smoke:


The paper of record once again withholds key information because the government tells it to.


by Glen Greenwald



Earlier today, I wrote in detail about new developments in the case of Raymond Davis, the former Special Forces soldier who shot and killed two Pakistanis on January 27, sparking a diplomatic conflict between the U.S. (which is demanding that he be released on the ground of "diplomatic immunity") and Pakistan (whose population is demanding justice and insisting that he was no "diplomat"). But I want to flag this new story separately because it's really quite amazing and revealing.



Yesterday, as I noted earlier, The Guardian reported that Davis -- despite Obama's description of him as "our diplomat in Pakistan" -- actually works for the CIA, and further noted that Pakistani officials believe he worked with Blackwater. When reporting that, The Guardian noted that many American media outlets had learned of this fact but deliberately concealed it -- because the U.S. Government told them to: "A number of US media outlets learned about Davis's CIA role but have kept it under wraps at the request of the Obama administration."



Now it turns out that The New York Times -- by its own shameless admission -- was one of those self-censoring, obedient media outlets. Now that The Guardian published its story last night, the NYT just now published a lengthy article detailing Davis' work -- headlined: "American Held in Pakistan Shootings Worked With the C.I.A." -- and provides a few more details:



-...In other words, the NYT knew about Davis' work for the CIA (and Blackwater) but concealed it because the U.S. Government told it to. Now that The Guardian and other foreign papers reported it, the U.S. Government gave permission to the NYT to report this, so now that they have government license, they do so -- only after it's already been reported by other newspapers which don't take orders from the U.S. Government.


cont'


http://www.salon.com/news/the_new_york_times/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2011/02/21/nyt


.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 07:22 PM
Original message
I am still unclear as to whether this man works for the CIA or XE
If he is a private contractor, how does international law treat him? Does he have diplomatic immunity?

The NYT gave up being an honest broker of news long ago, but it is nice to occasionally be reminded of exactly how far they have fallen.

Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. " Mr. Davis has worked for years as a C.I.A. contractor,
including time at Blackwater Worldwide, the controversial private security firm (now called Xe. "

UPDATE II: At his news conference last week, this is what President Obama said about the Davis situation:

With respect to Mr. Davis, our diplomat in Pakistan, we've got a very simple principle here that every country in the world that is party to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations has upheld in the past and should uphold in the future. And that is if -- if our diplomats are in another country, then they are not subject to that country's local prosecution.




I believe its the position of the State Department and WH that they want Davis treated as a diplomat....LOL!,..Now thats a stretch!!..:rofl:

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
social_critic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. The man could work for the CIA and also have diplomatic immunity
The way it works, the man could be a CIA employee seconded to the State Department. US embassies (as well as embassies from other cuontries) carry a complement of CIA employees who work using diplomatic cover. These are pretty safe jobs.

Valerie Plame, the lady whose CIA role was disclosed by the Bush administration, was a NOC, which means Non Official Cover, I believe. NOCs are the agents who can get killed, shot, tortured, and so on. And when it happens, it's seldom revealed.

I learned this by reading books such as Imperial Hubris by Anonymous, the CIA officer who was in charge of tracing Osama bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. NYT > Judith Miller's previous "professional" home for LIES about Iraq & Valerie Plame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If they don't get caught red handed with their hand in the cookie jar, it NEVER happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Was this the transparency I was promised??
Any more transparency and one could see all the way to WikiLeaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
social_critic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Who promised you anything about CIA agents in Pakistan?
I'm sorry, but I don't think the transparency issue extends as far as telling you who is a CIA agent in Pakistan. This applies even more to agents working the street in Islamabad or say Peshawar. I think Peshawar is just as bad as Kandahar, as far as a US government employee is concerned.

A transparency issue you may want to bring up: Why is Guantanamo still open, who is in there, why are they being held, and why are they not being put on trial, released, or treated as POWs?

Another issue of interest: Why did the USA vote against the UN Security Resolution to condemn Israel for its settlement policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. The word mercy is going to have a new meaning
When we are judged by the children of our slaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. ...
:mad: xe and the cia has a revolving door -- and sometimes one is an employee of both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC