|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 08:51 AM Original message |
SELF-DELETED BY MEMBER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. Obama designed a commission to attack Social Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 08:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. and just as poster gratuitus has been saying, falsely using the catfood commission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 08:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. That commission is a ruse. Set up by Pete Peterson and stacked with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
3. If the government can't afford to honor it's obligations how can it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. ding ding ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinee (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
6. Oh, but the tax cut for millionaires is perfectly affordable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:03 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yes, I mean it worked so splendidly the last 10 years, let's keep extending it forever! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
8. TOLL FREE Capitol Hill Switchboard numbers: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:49 AM Response to Reply #8 |
38. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
10. Oddly, your title doesn't seem to reflect the content of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:13 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Are you trying to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:14 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Right here...it was inconsistent to say the least, but that's Boehner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:16 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. the very sentence after that orange john criticizes obama for not having a plan to cut the programs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:17 AM Response to Reply #13 |
21. WTF do you think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
29. Boner said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:15 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. you have a quote from boehner that obama responded "positively" to starting a "conversation". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
11. no where in the article does is say "obama responds favorably" to SS cuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:15 AM Original message |
Yeah, exactly, Boehner wants to propose cuts and Obama responded positively |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
28. so, you expected obama to call him an asshole and refuse to speak to him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
32. Boner said that the President responded positively to talking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
luvspeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:16 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Now people are believing Boner!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
15. Very misleading subject line... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
16. So people are now promoting Boehner's fantasy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
17. So, we're talking our cues from what the WSJ reports Boehner says?...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #17 |
41. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
19. Obama is about 800% smarter than boner, i'll trust Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
22. There is no "problem." We cannot have Obama responding positively to someone saying there is one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:19 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. You don't know that he did... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:21 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Reprehensible??!! hahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:23 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. No one cares what you don't "doubt"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:24 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Where did I claim it was a fact? I was quoting an article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:26 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:54 AM Response to Reply #31 |
39. no, it seems you're deliberately spinning a story to make obama look evil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 10:01 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. And, of course... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:40 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. I, too, am open to the president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:19 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Why are you responding to yourself?...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
25. Probably why Obama announced cut to SS suring the SOTU ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
26. Deleted message |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
34. PLANS!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
35. Eh. That's Boehner posturing, most likely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
37. Murdoch Journal should NOT be allowed at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
42. We seem to have posted the same story at more or less the same time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC