Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tom Coburn: Government employees are a drag on the economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:04 PM
Original message
Tom Coburn: Government employees are a drag on the economy
http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2011/03/07/tom-coburn-government-employees-are-a-drag-on-the-economy/

Tom Coburn: Government employees are a drag on the economy
Posted by Nin-Hai Tseng, writer-reporter

The 62-year-old Republican senator estimates there's between $100 billion to $200 billion in duplicative spending, although the GAO did not report a specific figure. Coburn says if anything, the findings echo just how inefficient Congress really is. He hopes the report will serve as a template for plans to reduce spending in a big way. I caught up with Coburn, a medical doctor and ordained Southern Baptist deacon. We talked about the government looming debts and deficits, steps to save the government money and the 2011 federal budget...

What do you find most wasteful?

Job training is wasteful. We put 'help wanted' on our government website and we're getting people who have been through these programs who say they are a total joke and a total waste of time...

With consolidation, public employees would lose their jobs. Couldn't that put upward pressure on unemployment at a pretty dismal time?

No. First of all, government employees, although they're fabulous and they overall do a great job, they produce no net economic benefit in our country. Matter of fact, they produce a net negative economic benefit. So if you take the drag off the economy by nonproductive implementation of capital what you're going to see is that capital is then going to be put to use in something that is productive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. This man is a real piece of ....... something.

nt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well Tom, I suggest we start by reducing the salaries of all elected officials by 50%. We have them
pay 60% of their health insurance premiums, and completely eliminate their pension plan. We will replace that pension (for serving a few terms of office) with a 401K plan and the taxpayers will contribute $.35 for every $1 the official puts toward his/her retirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I'm going to put this as my FB status
Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Though he isn't saying so.. he's referring mostly to himself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. We could start by getting rid of him!
Edited on Mon Mar-07-11 12:10 PM by xxqqqzme
After all, he's on the government payroll.



Rethugs just do not understand irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree ......... He is a drag on this country
and he produces no net economic benefit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. He oughta know
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yesphan Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Talk about
Duplicate spending and overlap... Since Coburn and OK's other senator vote exactly the same
way, all the time, why not do away with one of them and let the other just vote twice? Nice
bit of savings there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Does he realize that HE ia a government employee? In which case I would have to
agree, that yes HE and his ilk are a drag on the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. It is the ELECTED officials who cost the most and make the most negative impact.
What a fool. I'm sad he's from my state. Makes us all look like idiots.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Then he should resign his $175,000 a year government job.
Lead by example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. SO QUIT, TOMMY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Coburn couldn't wipe his own ass
If it weren't for all those government employees running his office, feeding him, fixing the roads so his limo can get to the Capitol, et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. "no net economic benefit"?
Only if you count "economic benefit" as "profits for the CEO and shareholders".

Sure, doc. Why don't you take your next flight back to Tulsa without government employee air traffic control, on a plane without government-employee-enforced safety regulations? Go to a VA hospital and tell the patients that the government employee doctors and nurses are being nonproductive by treating them.

Why don't we eliminate redundancy by letting government-employee senators clean their own toilets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. Waste? It's called "regulation"
Republicans is why we need them.

I wouldn't let that guy lick my dog's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. then he should resign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. Leave it to the idiot Coburn to make a Marxist argument.
Doesn't the moron know he is practically quoting Das Capital when he complains public servants generate no net economic benefit? What a maroon. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. Coburn fits well in the tradition of horrible Oklahoma Senators
Poor Oklahoma has only had one sane senator (David Boren) since the late 70s. Nickles and Inhofe were bad enough as a pair, but Coburn and Inhofe seem to be even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC