Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Welfare State: Handouts Make Up One-Third of U.S. Wages"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:35 PM
Original message
"Welfare State: Handouts Make Up One-Third of U.S. Wages"
http://www.cnbc.com/id/41969508
Government payouts—including Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance—make up more than a third of total wages and salaries of the U.S. population, a record figure that will only increase if action isn’t taken before the majority of Baby Boomers enter retirement.

Even as the economy has recovered, social welfare benefits make up 35 percent of wages and salaries this year, up from 21 percent in 2000 and 10 percent in 1960, according to TrimTabs Investment Research using Bureau of Economic Analysis data.

“The U.S. economy has become alarmingly dependent on government stimulus,” said Madeline Schnapp, director of Macroeconomic Research at TrimTabs, in a note to clients. “Consumption supported by wages and salaries is a much stronger foundation for economic growth than consumption based on social welfare benefits......

The economist gives the country two stark choices. In order to get welfare back to its pre-recession ratio of 26 percent of pay, “either wages and salaries would have to increase $2.3 trillion, or 35 percent, to $8.8 trillion, or social welfare benefits would have to decline $500 billion, or 23 percent, to $1.7 trillion,” she said.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NOW S.S. = "WELFARE."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't ya think the answer is to increase salaries until whatever ratio is desired is reached?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Wouldn't work. Rising wages (without a corresponding productivity gain) would create inflation
that would necessitate a corresponding rise in the government payouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. We have had VAST productivity gains for the last 30 years and the money all went to the top. We need
MORE for the workers. That inflation claim is inflated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inademv Donating Member (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Funny how
they didn't count business subsidies and tax benefits in that figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Or bail-outs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Hey. Wages is not the same thing as income.
The top 2 percent or so still have the staggering amount of income. And SSI is not a handout anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mister Ed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. That Social Security Fund you've paid into all your life? Now it's "welfare"?
The article's author also seems to miss the obvious fact that the reason people are collecting government payments instead of wages is that the Coporatocracy shipped their jobs overseas and then crashed the economy, causing even further unemployment!

:mad: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. How Much Of This Total Is From Unemployment Insurance?......
Strikes me that due to the recession that this country was thrust into because of Wall St, the Banksters and BushCo/Repugs - unemployment went up to astronomical heights. How much will this number go down if we get people employed again?

In my mind everything revolves around 'jobs'. Jobs are the engine of growth out of most of our problems. Instead of companies laying people off, making them redundant or just plain firing them - they need to start hiring. I'll say it again - as people start feeling good about themselves knowing that they have income coming in - they will start to go to restaurants, theater's, on vacation, spend money on remodeling, cars, appliances. Once this starts happening - more people will need to be employed to replace what was sold and to service the people that are coming back into the system. Those people in turn will start feeling good about themselves and will start spending their money and further fuel the engine. This is the only way I see us climbing out of this hole we're in. Everything will start falling into place. Taxes will be generated. States will be able to start seeing some relief.

Everything in my mind revolves around the jobs. We need a 'jobs telethon'. We need to create an image that hiring people and putting them back to work is patriotic. We need some kind of campaign to do that. Firing people is un-american. Farming jobs out overseas is un-american.

We need to drive this message through to employers and businesses all over this country. We don't generate jobs by giving tax breaks to the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Of course employing people in other countries is "un-American".
That doesn't mean it's bad.

I'm all in favour of attempts to improve living standards in the USA, but not at the expense of reducing them elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'll take Door No. 1, Monty!
wages and salaries would have to increase $2.3 trillion, or 35 percent, to $8.8 trillion,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because the pukes are not happy until their definition..
of "undiserrables" have been removed from society. They would love to see grandma and grandpa work themselves to death. This type of shit is nothing short of a republicans final solution. Not all those people using those social services are welfare leaches, so people have no choice, because they can not work due to disablity or medical consition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. We pay into Medicare and Social Security with each paycheck.. Employers pay for federal and state
unemployment.

None of that is welfare!

Fuck you repukes!

What has happened is that the repukes have spent that money and owe it to us. They don't want to pay us back so the spread the lie that it is welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. We pay for it and we later collect it-then put it right back into te economy
Edited on Tue Mar-08-11 08:20 PM by Lorien
unlike the fraudsters on Wall Street (HALF of all income or more) who take government money-then loan it back to the government with interest and give themselves massive bonuses for the scam!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Now S.S. = 'Welfare.'" NO -- NOW S.S. = "HANDOUTS"
Never mind the recipients spent a whole lifetime working and paying into the system.
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Um, yeah, wages and salaries have to increase.
Task number one create a lot of new jobs.
Task number two, pay a living wage for those jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. If wages are too low - and companies refuse to pay a living wage
people have to resort to assistance to meet basic needs.

People working service sector jobs generally do not make enough to survive on their salaries - so some companies use the U.S. govt to help them make a profit by refusing to pay salaries that make it possible for people to afford health care, food and a place to live.

that's the reality for some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. CNBC = Faux "News" Financial.
Of course they're going to pull this bullshit line that something you pay into your whole life is now called "WELFARE!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Then create some jobs ....
asswipes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC