Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WI State Senator Under Recall Hammer Caught in Supreme Court Recount

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 08:01 PM
Original message
WI State Senator Under Recall Hammer Caught in Supreme Court Recount
http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/574771/wi_state_senator_under_recall_hammer_caught_in_supreme_court_recount/

WI Senator Sheila Harsdorf (R) is facing a recall election. The volunteers have turned in over 23,000 signatures, well over the 15,744 required. Just 3 weeks ago during the Supreme Court election these same volunteers were out at the polls. in addition to voting they were getting the extra signatures so they could turn in 150% of the signatures required for recall.

Election day on April 5th saw many people at the polls. Volunteers with "Recall Harsdorf - Sign the Petition Here" signs and the Republicans with their "I Stand With Sheila" message worked the crowds as people left their polling location. Over 1,200 recall signatures were collected that day alone, as over 38,000 citizens voted that in just that district.

Harsdorf was not at the polls to face voters that day. Instead Harsdorf chose to vote absentee. Voting absentee is quite simple in Wisconsin. A voter requests an absentee ballot then fills it out and places it in the ballot envelope. The voter and a witness are then required to sign their name to the ballot envelope. It seems like reasonable rules, ones that most voters can comply to with no problems. But not Harsdorf. Instead she returned a ballot in an envelope without a witness signature.

This was not caught on election day, her illegal vote was opened and counted in the original certified result of the WI Supreme Court election. Normally the story would end here, but due to the recount the ballot bags were opened and examined in the presence of witnesses and observers from both campaigns. At this point the illegal vote was discovered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. So the only thing illegal was that there was no witness signature?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah.
Super nefarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I can see how you could do that if they mailed it to you.
Usually if I vote early I go to the County Clerk and stand in line, then they sign it while I'm standing there.

But I like to vote on the day of the election so I can see how good the turnout is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. She and other Walker poodles are about to pass a bill to get rid of absentee
voting (or curtail it immensely). Instead of opening up the ballot, she and repugs will crack down on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So people serving in the military won't be able to vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. There was a separate clause in there that addressed the military because
in the past, WI had to few days to get the ballot to them and get it back in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is why, in Wisconsin at least, it's probably better to go to the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AleksS Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. See, the GOP is right, we need tough
voter ID laws to prevent this kind of fraud! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC