General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMcGahn put this all in writing... and then he turned it over to Mueller.
Now here is where it gets FUN!
As it turns out, Don McGahn is no dummy.
In fact, he might be the lone smart guy in the place.
McGahn put this all in writing... and then he turned it over to Mueller.
So, basically, Mueller has documentation effectively proving Trump, et al, were made aware Flynn had likely committed crimes AND lied about them to the FBI - which is DEFINITELY a crime.
That knowledge on Trumps part is the golden key to an obstruction case.Link to tweet
Refresh your beverage and settle in.read the entire thread for clarity:Link to tweet
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/12/20/white-house-counsel-knew-in-january-flynn-probably-violated-the-law/
rurallib
(62,406 posts)and the noose gets tighter
phylny
(8,379 posts)bench scientist
(1,107 posts)Farmer-Rick
(10,154 posts)Back in Feb 2017, Spicer was lying about it. Seems in 27 Jan 2017, Reince Priebus claims Trump's lawyer was saying everything Trump was doing was A OK.
I wonder if the RepubliCONS will be able to end this investigation and destroy the FBI before little Lord Trump and Lady Malaria are kicked out of the white house?
RVN VET71
(2,690 posts)I doubt if anyone thinks he knew what he said to the press was a lie. He may have suspected it was, but I don't think he was privy to the stuff the chief of staff would have known.
Priebus, however, lied.
The GOP is trying its damndest to get Mueller canned, constitution be damned. We'll see if the Dems have the smarts and courage to beat them down.
OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)They have two different and contradicting narratives. One of them will need a new lawyer.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Which means it is likely that Priebus is cooperating with the FBI. If he lied to the public back then, it may be reprehensible, but it isn't a crime.
OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)GallopingGhost
(2,404 posts)of Spicer foaming at the mouth and practically ripping the podium out of the floor at the mere suggestion that the so-called was lying.
Irish_Dem
(46,918 posts)And there was so much illegal stuff going on, he had to know some of it.
I do not think he is a stupid.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)the ins and out of this political game better than anybody and that is what it is about.
MGKrebs
(8,138 posts)It's not some vendetta or liberal bias, it's because they know all this stuff, they smell the blood in the water, they just can't report all of it without corroboration. Just the Comey firing alone- Trump praises Comey in October, fails to get a loyalty pledge in January, then fires him in May- is so obviously obstruction.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Trump worked on a real-estate project with a guy named Felix Sater.
Felix Sater has ties to the russian mob.
If Trump knew that, and didn't tell law-enforcement, then Trump is up for racketeering charges.
YessirAtsaFact
(2,064 posts)Probably laundering money for them.
This is probably the biggest compromised hook Putin has. Golden showers are just embarrassing.
Money laundering can put people in jail.
triron
(21,999 posts)Response to DetlefK (Reply #5)
Name removed Message auto-removed
jmbar2
(4,874 posts)This was one of the best Christmas presents I could get - knowing that they've got him boxed in. And that there are patriots in the white house standing up for our democracy. Whew....
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)they were being railroaded into taking the blame for the Flynn mess. If that was the case, you can bet McGahn at least, had documented everything. She also mused that it's interesting, in the light of McGahn's disclosure to Mueller, that he's still working in the White House. I wonder how long that will continue ?
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,783 posts)That Maddow segment pricked up my ears bigly.
What did Trump know and when did he know it as Rachel went carefully down the timeline of when Sally Yates notified Don McGahn about Flynn, thus telling Trump. That resulted in the firing of Sally Yates. FIRST MISTAKE on Trump's part. Whose idea was that? Trump's or McGahn's?
Then Michael Flynn resigns. Jim Comey is told to go easy on Flynn and drop the FBI Investigation on Flynn. Comey says no and is fired. Cover up? Sure looks like that. If Trump did not know about Flynn's lying to the FBI or his other dealings, he would not have asked Comey for loyalty and drop the investigation that has led to Robert Mueller.
Talk about a big mess for Donald Trump.
OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)naive, regardless.
wishstar
(5,268 posts)Trump gang was warned in August about potential attempts by Russia to collude and need to report such contacts with FBI, Hope Hicks was personally warned by FBI about Russia contacts after it was picked up on intelligence that Russians were emailing her during transition and then Sally Yates of DOJ on behalf of FBI warned WH about Flynn's dishonesty when questioned by FBI over Kislyak.
Trump's intelligence briefings during transition left no doubt about Russian criminal hacking during campaign justifying sanctions.
Yet Trump and his inner circle knowing their Russian contacts involved wrongdoing, continued lying, covering up and withholding even from FBI and Senate/House committees. But getting concrete documentation from McGahn seems crucial for making a solid legal case since Trump has avoided any email or paper trails.
marble falls
(57,077 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)marble falls
(57,077 posts)samnsara
(17,616 posts)calimary
(81,220 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 23, 2017, 01:23 AM - Edit history (1)
And then again, there are those who simply dont WANT to see straight.
kentuck
(111,079 posts)I have always thought that McGahn knows a lot.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)You did a better job.
Perseus
(4,341 posts)interview that Trump had with Lester Holt where Trump offered his explanation why he fired Comey? He plainly said it was because of the Russia investigation.
"And in fact when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said 'you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story, it's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should have won'."
He admitted to firing Comey because of the "Russia thing", if that is not obstruction of justice I need someone to pleas explain..please.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)...to be locked up.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)Is this client privilege thingy..aren't we the client..WH counsel and all..I must be a dummy..
Nice!
Mr.Bill
(24,282 posts)the republican Congress will do absolutely nothing.
OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)the Republicans (as we have seen lately) would sell their mother to keep power. So what happens then ? It wouldn't be just a constitutional crisis, it would be democracy in America, on the line.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)Nitram
(22,791 posts)Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)The Office of White House Counsel advises the President, the Executive Office of the President, and the White House staff on legal issues pertaining to the President and the White House. It is often said that the office sits at the intersection of law, policy, and politics.
bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)it is put in writing, keep a record, document everything.
You ain't got paper, you ain't got nothing.
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)He was a Bush appointee to the FEC and served under both Bush and Obama. He knows the value of writing keeping contemporaneous memos of what happened when and that you never know when those documents will prove useful.