Well, unless there's some buried bombshell, I'm REALLY disappointed

[RandomAccess]

And not willing to give our friend Scott Dworkin a pass on this.

Talk about HYPE.

And O'Donnell had to cut his vacation short for this??

Phooey.

He'll probably have to ascend to heaven or get raptured or something if Trump is ever indicted or impeached or something.

Did I say I was disgusted? That too.

[rzemanfl]

1. +1 so far. n/t

[LonePirate]

2. How times do these rumors have to be complete let downs before people stop believing them?

Never, ever believe these whispers or coming soon reports.

Dworkin may have just Mensched himself today.

[RandomAccess]

5. This one may have taught me MY lesson

[onecaliberal]

3. Its not 10:30 yet

[uponit7771]

4. +1, Trump saying something stupid is not newsworthy !!!!!

[RandomAccess]

7. Amen [phone]

[Phoenix61]

6. Me too

An interview? That's what all the hype has been about is an effing interview Twitler gave!?!?! What the heck difference does it make what he says when he lies ALL THE TIME!!! Ari is calling Twitler canny!!! If this isn't normalizing Twitler I don't know what is.

[kimbutgar]

8. Not good enough...turning off the channel.

Twitler bs stunt for attention.

[bathroommonkey76]

10. lol How is it a Twitter stunt?

Grant Stern hasn't made an appearance yet.

Link to tweet

[IluvPitties]

9. Call me when a big indictment is announced.

[elfin]

11. Was ready to be disappointed, but admit I had a faint hope

NO interview with the Dump is worth air time.

He played NYT with a supposed exclusive without minders and got all the attention on narcissistic him, which he loves. Now commentators and anchors will go in circles trying to "analyze" each ludicrous statement. But it is worth zip, in that it is just a repetitive compilation of his nods and winks that he MIGHT fire Sessions or others.

It is not "news."

The headline is "Libs Burned AGAIN by Media Promising Bombshell,"

[RandomAccess]

16. Well said

[uponit7771]

12. WAIT!!! WAIT!!! Ari said O'Donnell still to make announcement

[thbobby]

13. Breaking News!

Bullshit. All of this hype for bullshit. Banner should read "Breaking News : Bullshit that means nothing"

[Hoyt]

14. Worse, we get sucked into this junk every time. And we forget every time. Like Mueller

was going to be fired over Christmas, not to mention just about every week since he was appointed.

I’m hopeful this is not another Fitzmas, but . . . . . . .

[Silver Gaia]

15. I think what Dworkin was talking about has nothing to do with this NYT nonsense.

I went back and read his Tweets on this. He said it's a "follow the money" thing that's BIG. That ain't this. What Lawrence is excited about may or may not be connected, and he hasn't been on air yet, but I think not. I think Dworkin's story hasn't broken yet.

[RandomAccess]

17. I hope you're right

[Amaryllis]

18. Please explain.I have no idea what you are talking about with the Scott Dworkin reference.

And Lawrence is still coming up so we dont know yet what his big reveal is.

[RandomAccess]

19. Sure

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210034551#post10

[Silver Gaia]

20. Thanks.

[Silver Gaia]

21. Yes, we still don't know for sure what Lawrence is going to talk about.

[ecstatic]

22. Glad I abstained this time. Binge watching

Bates Motel, but periodically checking DU for the "major" news because I'm sick of the MSM right now. A part of me was really hoping trump would resign before 1/1/18. Wishful thinking, I guess.

[elfin]

23. And I quit a Peaky Blinders binge for it. Yuck.

And sucker that I am, now waiting for Lawrence to come on with Ari.

[Silver Gaia]

24. Well, definitely NOT connected.

Dworkin and O'Donnell news not in the same universe.

This is OUR fault, not theirs, IMO.

We are so starved for something good that WE blew this out of proportion.

[DeminPennswoods]

25. I don't find Dworkin very credible

He's occassionally on MSNBC, but I can't recall him ever having much inside info.

[RandomAccess]

34. Oh, O'Donnell's tweet was VERY hyped compared to actual.

So yes, HIS fault.

[Siwsan]

26. I am officially breaking up with MSNBC

This kind of stunt is just too draining.

[bearsfootball516]

28. Ill catch a lot of flak for this

But other than Rachel, MSNBC isn’t a very good news source. They almost never break anything of substance, and do a lot of shallow reporting.

[Siwsan]

30. The only shows I watched were Rachel and Lawrence - sometimes Joy

Rachel started to lose me with her long wind-ups to a story. I know some people like that, but it's not how I process information. I prefer elaboration on the actual story, not an extensive build up TO that story. I kind of backed off of watching her show but tuned in to Lawrence. Now I feel 'punked' by him. He had to know how that tweet would be interpreted.

[bearsfootball516]

32. Rachel is usually solid

Although I did fall for her “I have Trump’s tax returns” bit from this spring.

[Siwsan]

33. That was the beginning of the end, for me

I found myself mentally yelling at the tv "PLEASE GET TO THE POINT!!!!!!!!!!!!" too many times, after that.

[Ferrets are Cool]

27. This time I REALLY do feel like Charlie Brown. nm

[still_one]

29. They always do this, and 90% of the time it is bullshit. That is why I don't waste time with the

so-called news outlets here. Newspapers, Bloomberg and international sources usually are more accurate

[MFM008]

31. all maggot did

was give the world another example of his deluded mental disorder.