General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney to Olympians: 'You didn't get here solely on your own'
Romney to Olympians: 'You didn't get here solely on your own'By NBCs Domenico Montanaro
Mitt Romney has criticized President Obama for his you didnt build that line, when it came to businesses. The president was making an it takes a village argument, which the Romney campaign and conservatives have roundly panned.
But in 2002, during his speech at the Opening Ceremonies at the Winter Olympics -- the games in which Romney was lauded for turning around the management of the event -- Romney made a similar argument about Olympians.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/23/12904508-romney-to-olympians-you-didnt-get-here-solely-on-your-own?lite
DrDan
(20,411 posts)beac
(9,992 posts)but it's worth watching the whole thing to gawk at Rmoney's incredible awkwardness, lack of charisma and truly bad speech giving.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)it just writes itself
beac
(9,992 posts)dorky fist pump he does in it.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)before his handlers told him he was against it.
brewens
(13,563 posts)Robme was never an athlete as far as I know. Other than watching trainers torture his wives horse, he would have no idea what it takes to train hard enough to even have a shot at the olympic level.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Willard now either has to apologize to himself or attack himself
MidwestTransplant
(8,015 posts)rfranklin
(13,200 posts)*** UPDATE *** A Republican strategist sends over this response: The Obama Campaign is comparing the government to a loving parent? What happened to Julia?
For the record, the post did not originate with the Obama campaign but an NBC archive search.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/23/12904508-romney-to-olympians-you-didnt-get-here-solely-on-your-own?lite
And let's not forget the hundreds of millions in federal tax money that Romney used to fund the Olympics!
Despite opposition from Sen. John McCain and other Republican leaders, the Winter Games federal budget grew from $200 million to about $600 million on Romneys watch, according to his book. When various transportation and other works projects are included, the federal government spent an estimated $1.5 billion from the time the Games were awarded to Salt Lake City in 1995 until they took place in 2002.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/10-years-after-salt-lake-city-olympics-questions-about-romneys-contributions/2012/02/01/gIQABnCX9Q_story_2.html
asjr
(10,479 posts)from scraps in an old castle in Transylvania.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Article was dated March 24, 2002.
http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/access/111261116.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Mar+24%2C+2002&author=&pub=Boston+Globe&desc=FOR+MATTRESS+FIRM+TIED+TO+ROMNEY\%27S+OLD+COMPANY%2C+DEAL+WAS+OLYMPIC-+SIZE&pqatl=top_retrieves
How does THAT happen?
Olympic guy says: We need some really good mattresses for these athletes boss.
Boss Romney says: Well I'm your huckleberry.
:shock:
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Don't Republicans know that everyone of integrity SEES plainly how full of shit they are.
Don't Republicans know that everyone is laffing at how screwed-up Republicon morals are not the matter of 'truth.'
Sheesh.
Igel
(35,296 posts)Believe it or not, that's most of the complaint.
"Olympians, you didn't get here on your own power" is blatantly false.
"Olympians, you didn't get here solely on your own power" is true.
A call for modesty and humbleness, to show gratitude to those who helped is good. But it's only really proper coming from the side, as a reminder or exhortation. "I didn't get here on my own" is taken as modesty, giving one's self negative face and giving others positive face. Such modesty may be false, but it builds social cohesion and good will. It says there are others besides you. It's inclusive and acknowledges debt.
A claim that you and yours are really whose responsible for another's success and a demand for payback is crass and self-aggrandizing. "You didn't do this" gives others negative face. When all those you cite as being really the great ones are somehow on your team, you're giving positive face in a way that reserves most of it for yourself. It builds a faction within social but destroys more social cohesion and good will than it builds. It says you're really the important people. It claims ownership. That's great if you're in that faction--all you see is increased social cohesion and you feel good because, well, you've gotten the credit you always knew you richly deserved. That's the little picture. What it produces is the defensive response from some businessman, "Yes, I certainly did do that on my own."
"That response? That businessman didn't say that. That snarky politician, that cloying aid, that kid from school who dropped out, they're the ones who achieved it. He couldn't have said it without them!" Yeah, not so great.
krhines
(115 posts)Olympians get their funding from the rich and huge corporations. We always need to find a way to give them credit for everything.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Dang that videotape that keeps making me look bad.
groundloop
(11,518 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)Can't wait to see what the Obama campaign does with this.