Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Wed Jan 10, 2018, 07:07 PM Jan 2018

Did anyone listen to Randi Rhodes today?


The main takeaway I got is what will happen should tRump refuse to comply with Mueller and testify.

Apparently nothing since you can't indict a sitting President.
It would be up to Congress at that point and yesterday tRump said he'll "sign anything" thus pleasing those with any power to do anything about his potential refusal to testify.

Buckle up.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
1. Malcom Nance today said somehow all the intel and investigation details by Mueller and our allies
Wed Jan 10, 2018, 07:11 PM
Jan 2018

who have proof that trump and the rest are criminals, will be released.

It would send us into civil unrest if half the country backed a traitor and criminal over the constitution.

Once it is clear Trump and many GOP are traitors, guilty, then the public can choose those people or the constitution and the country

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
3. It is now clear, he says, many of our allies, other countries, have intel on ole donald
Wed Jan 10, 2018, 07:14 PM
Jan 2018

and that he is dirty and they would have to release that.

The REASON he was being investigated in the first place is what his supporters dont understand or care to.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
5. That is my question, it sounded like our allies would solely because it would be the right
Wed Jan 10, 2018, 07:21 PM
Jan 2018

thing to do and that for our country to survive and peace to prevail, etc.

Why or how our people on the FBI would release, I think he assumes somebody would just do it, like Dianne did.

I worry about that though.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
6. It is not established that you can't indict a sitting president
Wed Jan 10, 2018, 08:24 PM
Jan 2018

It's never been decided, so there is just legal theory. However there are many precedents that say "the President is not above the law." If he is not above the law, then he can be indicted.

How to enforce? A court could order the head of the Secret Service to bring the President to the grand jury. The judge could hold the head of the Secret Service in civil contempt if he disobeys. You can be jailed for civil contempt, but it is not a crime, so the President can't pardon him for it.

That's one way this could happen.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did anyone listen to Rand...