HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » There "is" no collusion

Wed Jan 10, 2018, 10:06 PM

There "is" no collusion

Has anyone noticed that the Idiot-in-chief almost always says "there is no collusion" when referring to Russian election meddling. On a few occasions, he does use the past tense, but at least from what I've observed or heard, he almost always uses present tense, or sometimes present perfect tense, when discussing the collusion issue.

I wonder if this is another "it depends on what the meaning of 'is' is" defense that he is laying? Am I just imagining this??

I am sure Mueller's team will not let him get away with games like this if they get him under oath.

1 replies, 1240 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply There "is" no collusion (Original post)
DonaldsRump Jan 2018 OP
Lint Head Jan 2018 #1

Response to DonaldsRump (Original post)

Wed Jan 10, 2018, 11:40 PM

1. Can he spell conspiracy?

I knew he couldn't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread