General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI think there might be a problem with the idea of boycotting the state of the union address
It is formally a Joint session of Congress. While thats historically been used solely for things like allowing presidents and dignitaries address congress, I would think they could conduct ordinary congressional business if so inclined.
If so, democrats boycotting would give republicans the ability to pass a bill through the senate without a filibuster, given insufficient democrats present.
So Id think, better to go a turn their backs or protest in another way.
Or if they do boycott it, stand right outside in the hall so they can run in at a moments notice.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Golden Raisin
(4,608 posts)Any Republican shenanigans, mischief or tricks would be filmed.
unblock
(52,183 posts)they have neither shame nor conscience.
being televised would be a plus in their minds.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)during the speech.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)Drag out the exit...and quite the dramatic effect.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)I'd bet that it would throw him off the teleprompter and send him off the deep end.
A slow steady stream of Democrats and their guests just slowly filing out would be glorious.
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)former9thward
(31,970 posts)One Senator is enough to start a filibuster. Sixty is needed to overcome it assuming it is not judicial nominations.
unblock
(52,183 posts)eta:
according to wiki, 16 senators are needed to invoke cloture, so we'd need to keep 16 senators to prevent any shenanigans.
once that happens, the 60-vote thing doesn't happen for at least 2 legislative days later, so that should be enough to prevent any surprises.
in any event, it seems it takes 3/5th of all sworn-in senators, whether or not they are present, to end cloture.
moondust
(19,972 posts)"YOU LIE!" "YOU LIE!" "YOU LIE!" "YOU LIE!" "YOU LIE!" "YOU LIE!"