Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Towlie

(5,324 posts)
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 11:18 AM Jan 2018

Trump keeps National Institutes of Health director while firing most other Obama apointees. Why?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-health-202/2018/01/16/the-health-202-nih-wants-1-million-americans-to-contribute-to-new-pool-of-gene-data/5a5ba45a30fb0469e8840135/

Collins, who Trump notably retained as NIH director last year even as he replaced most other Obama appointees...

Why?

Starting this spring, Americans across the country will be invited to contribute to a massive new pool of genomic information being assembled by the government...

This program that Collins is pursuing sounds like a great idea and probably is, but considering Trump's obsessions, I can't help wondering how he sees it. What is it about collecting gene data from the population that appeals to Trump?

Volunteers won’t be study subjects; they’ll be partners, (Collins) stresses. He has found that to be one of the strongest arguments in attracting participants.

Sounds good, right?

“Of course, we can’t guarantee anybody that privacy is going to be absolutely protected no matter what, because we’ve all seen situations where hacking can happen,” Collins said.

Hacking? What about outright turning the data over to Trump for his own purposes?

Sounds far-fetched, I know, but I'm just an animated towel from a cartoon show and don't have to worry too much about sharing crazy ideas.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump keeps National Inst...