Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:32 AM Jan 2018

Wow, wow, wow! Flake!

Last edited Fri Jan 19, 2018, 07:52 AM - Edit history (1)

...Listening to Jeff Flake.

This is what we've been waiting for, whatever the impact or outcome. A Republican speaking truth to power against his own party's president on the Senate floor, and boy, is he bringing it!

It's not about this conservative Senator's voting record, we all know he's sowing what he's reaped, to his benefit, or not. It's the portrait that most Americans will see of this dyed-in-the-wool republican calling out his own president with strong and persuasive language that each and every one here should endorse.

Skepticism is well and correct when dealing with republicans, but cynicism serves no one except demagogues and those resigned to fate.

This is one for the history books, folks.


read Jeff Flake's speech:

excerpt:

"Mr. President, near the beginning of the document that made us free, our Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote: "We hold these truths to be self-evident ..." So, from our very beginnings, our freedom has been predicated on truth. The founders were visionary in this regard, understanding well that good faith and shared facts between the governed and the government would be the very basis of this ongoing idea of America.

As the distinguished former member of this body, Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York, famously said: "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." During the past year, I am alarmed to say that Senator Moynihan's proposition has likely been tested more severely than at any time in our history.

It is for that reason that I rise today, to talk about the truth, and its relationship to democracy. For without truth, and a principled fidelity to truth and to shared facts, Mr. President, our democracy will not last.

2017 was a year which saw the truth -- objective, empirical, evidence-based truth -- more battered and abused than any other in the history of our country, at the hands of the most powerful figure in our government. It was a year which saw the White House enshrine "alternative facts" into the American lexicon, as justification for what used to be known simply as good old-fashioned falsehoods. It was the year in which an unrelenting daily assault on the constitutionally-protected free press was launched by that same White House, an assault that is as unprecedented as it is unwarranted. "The enemy of the people," was what the president of the United States called the free press in 2017.

Mr. President, it is a testament to the condition of our democracy that our own president uses words infamously spoken by Josef Stalin to describe his enemies. It bears noting that so fraught with malice was the phrase "enemy of the people," that even Nikita Khrushchev forbade its use, telling the Soviet Communist Party that the phrase had been introduced by Stalin for the purpose of "annihilating such individuals" who disagreed with the supreme leader.

This alone should be a source of great shame for us in this body, especially for those of us in the president's party. For they are shameful, repulsive statements. And, of course, the president has it precisely backward -- despotism is the enemy of the people. The free press is the despot's enemy, which makes the free press the guardian of democracy. When a figure in power reflexively calls any press that doesn't suit him "fake news," it is that person who should be the figure of suspicion, not the press."

read more: http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/17/politics/jeff-flake-speech/index.html

watch:


142 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wow, wow, wow! Flake! (Original Post) bigtree Jan 2018 OP
An outstanding speech. And long overdue. spooky3 Jan 2018 #1
It Will Be Interesting To See Both Trump's & The Repugs.... global1 Jan 2018 #11
The minority influence literature in social psych says that spooky3 Jan 2018 #15
Check Out This From McCain.... global1 Jan 2018 #21
Thanks. Unfortunately, McCains health may mean he cant spooky3 Jan 2018 #38
Conjecture cilla4progress Jan 2018 #29
Snowflake? C'mon it's right there flibbitygiblets Jan 2018 #109
Hahahahaha cilla4progress Jan 2018 #117
Snowflake is the name of the Arizona town where he's from DesertRat Jan 2018 #121
Well there you have it flibbitygiblets Jan 2018 #123
Spot on but lacking substance as Flake refuses to stand up to Trump onit2day Jan 2018 #114
Won't miss him when he retires though. lagomorph777 Jan 2018 #2
I will, when he's replaced by a tea partier. pnwmom Jan 2018 #83
AZ might flip Motownman78 Jan 2018 #92
"Pretty words." LenaBaby61 Jan 2018 #89
As much as I wish it was otherwise, that is my assessment, too. BobTheSubgenius Jan 2018 #101
Exactly. The GOP is made up of opportunists and frauds nothing more. bench scientist Jan 2018 #108
He has always been very conservative, except on immigration WyLoochka Jan 2018 #135
When he starts voting against Trump, I will listen n2doc Jan 2018 #3
This. NT Bleacher Creature Jan 2018 #26
This x 1000. bullwinkle428 Jan 2018 #41
yup. nt Javaman Jan 2018 #45
Damn skippy. reflection Jan 2018 #47
Yep n/t LittleGirl Jan 2018 #52
Kabuki theater. Flake will vote for Trump legislative packages NCjack Jan 2018 #53
He has legislation right in front of him NOW he could support n2doc Jan 2018 #58
OK, Flake. show us that you have a spine. Vote for Net Neutrality. NCjack Jan 2018 #62
I agree - especially because it's essentially tied in to the topic of his speech. LisaM Jan 2018 #86
"Yeah, I think he is Stalin but he always gets my vote" dalton99a Jan 2018 #73
Watching. Going to call my Senators and Rep when he is livetohike Jan 2018 #4
But he'll still vote for everything trump wants. This is BS grandstanding. NightWatcher Jan 2018 #5
Flake is running for President. Zoonart Jan 2018 #6
He would have absolutely no chance bearsfootball516 Jan 2018 #50
Slate - "Flake's Empty Words" - a caution NRaleighLiberal Jan 2018 #7
+1, Flake; "Trumps horrible, now watch me vote for his horrible legislation" uponit7771 Jan 2018 #19
+2 NewJeffCT Jan 2018 #25
Yep. As horrible as dump is not fooled Jan 2018 #111
CNN, MSNBC and, even Fox News covering speech. oasis Jan 2018 #8
faux cut away... spanone Jan 2018 #18
Fox's Howard Kurtz slams Flake after the speech. Foxbots rarely oasis Jan 2018 #49
What is he saying? smirkymonkey Jan 2018 #22
Basically, Trump's attack on the press is no different than that oasis Jan 2018 #46
Thanks! smirkymonkey Jan 2018 #65
Words, words, words . . . hatrack Jan 2018 #9
Don't fall for the okey doke on him. SweetieD Jan 2018 #10
This is not about the speaker. Its about a Republican spooky3 Jan 2018 #14
Still, its a speech, not a vote. JHB Jan 2018 #12
This is better than nothing and is historical... steve2470 Jan 2018 #13
We need to get over ourselves. Flake will never vote in line with the Democrats. Mr. Ected Jan 2018 #16
that's an important point bigtree Jan 2018 #24
NPR was interviewing Flake this morning BoneyardDem Jan 2018 #36
Flake is a not fooled Jan 2018 #112
Yes, he is saying what needs to be said PatSeg Jan 2018 #43
Very well said Time for change Jan 2018 #122
Yeah, yeah, yeah...what's his voting record? Iggo Jan 2018 #17
Excellent speech. greatauntoftriplets Jan 2018 #20
Flake thinks Trump is Stalin. But he is still willing to vote for his agenda. mn9driver Jan 2018 #23
He actually said this?!!??? JustAnotherGen Jan 2018 #28
Doesn't mean shit mindfulNJ Jan 2018 #27
i missed it...im sure it will be on later... samnsara Jan 2018 #30
Enough in there to justify impeachment kennetha Jan 2018 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2018 #32
Talk is cheap . He doesn't like trump but votes republican values. Pence or Ryan? He'd be fine lunasun Jan 2018 #33
On MSNBC this am, he criticized Trump's dishonesty misrepresenting the facts-BUT wishstar Jan 2018 #34
I disagree. It was pure political stuntsmanship. He was making a 2020 campaign commercial Stinky The Clown Jan 2018 #35
what do you do with that assessment, that position? bigtree Jan 2018 #37
I won't dismiss Flake gratuitous Jan 2018 #39
Flake is leaving bigtree Jan 2018 #44
So you're saying that Flakes Fine Speech is directed to Democrats? gratuitous Jan 2018 #48
politics isn't as static as you describe bigtree Jan 2018 #51
As I said, I'm not "dismissing Flake" gratuitous Jan 2018 #55
I 'embrace' Flake's criticisms of Trump today. I endorse what he said bigtree Jan 2018 #59
Well, good for you gratuitous Jan 2018 #61
yet you took pains to highlight Flake over the truths he spoke today bigtree Jan 2018 #63
There is negligible value in ANY republican speaking out against Trump... Saviolo Jan 2018 #97
so the several discussions about Trump, the press, and his impact on the press around the globe bigtree Jan 2018 #100
I didn't say none, I said negligible. Saviolo Jan 2018 #110
using that standard bigtree Jan 2018 #116
All Flake is doing is tone policing Trump Saviolo Jan 2018 #133
if he is, he's 'tone policing' poorly bigtree Jan 2018 #134
fine. someone running on the notion that cheato is a tyrant mopinko Jan 2018 #40
True but so was Cory Booker yesterday misanthrope Jan 2018 #125
Ah. The old fallback to WhatAboutIsm Stinky The Clown Jan 2018 #132
Fine but there's sauce for the goose and gander alike misanthrope Jan 2018 #138
Well played. WhatAboutIsm *and* BothSidesIsm. Stinky The Clown Jan 2018 #140
Why you're playing your "ism-schism game" misanthrope Jan 2018 #141
Bless your heart. Stinky The Clown Jan 2018 #142
Did he just throw his hat into the ring? MissKat Jan 2018 #42
flake bunny planet Jan 2018 #54
Morons enid602 Jan 2018 #56
This is important. Flake will still vote for all the GOP bills, he's very conservative, AJT Jan 2018 #57
Folks, there is a profound difference between core constitutional principles and political agendas Tom Rinaldo Jan 2018 #60
THIS FirstLight Jan 2018 #87
Agreed and thank you. MuseRider Jan 2018 #106
zero new info, flake supports trumps policies AlexSFCA Jan 2018 #64
Do not listen to what they say, look at what they do. dhol82 Jan 2018 #66
Blah, Blah, Blah matt819 Jan 2018 #67
Stalin must have borrowed it from Ibsen DFW Jan 2018 #68
Great speech davekriss Jan 2018 #69
If he said in his speech that he regrets any of his votes, PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2018 #70
Can you say "2020 primary challenge"? nt Persondem Jan 2018 #71
Same flake who gave Trump the tax scam and voted to kill Obamacare dalton99a Jan 2018 #72
that would be the majority of the republican party bigtree Jan 2018 #75
He's all kinds of brave now that he "retired" apnu Jan 2018 #74
That was a great speech by Senator Flake Gothmog Jan 2018 #76
I agree!!! Touche' to Flake. Voting record or not, at least he's speaking out. Honeycombe8 Jan 2018 #77
Watch what he does, not what he says... diva77 Jan 2018 #78
better yet bigtree Jan 2018 #80
But but MFM008 Jan 2018 #79
"I cant believe what you say, because I see what you do." James Baldwin Perseus Jan 2018 #81
Nice speech. aquamarina Jan 2018 #82
The "truth" has been missing from the GOP for a long time GregGilman Jan 2018 #84
Yawn! Wake me when Flakes votes start matching his words against the traitor. LonePirate Jan 2018 #85
"Wake me when Flakes votes start matching his words against the traitor." LenaBaby61 Jan 2018 #90
Quick question.. FirstLight Jan 2018 #88
Henceforth to be known as "Flakey!" dchill Jan 2018 #91
Righteous. Obviously Flake is an intelligent guy. BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2018 #93
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ), who has compared Trump to Stalin, Perseus Jan 2018 #94
how many Democrats in the Senate calling for impeachment? bigtree Jan 2018 #95
That is not the issue. To say you will not vote to impeach Perseus Jan 2018 #99
it's absolutely relevant bigtree Jan 2018 #104
This is from Flake's speech Perseus Jan 2018 #98
Flake personifies British politician Iain Bank's comment... dobleremolque Jan 2018 #96
K&R. LOL, that's a classic line. KY_EnviroGuy Jan 2018 #102
Well gilligan Jan 2018 #103
I VERY much hope his words have at least some effect. BobTheSubgenius Jan 2018 #105
Despite the speech he remains a reliable Republican vote. Golden Raisin Jan 2018 #107
Jeff Flake is/will be campaigning for the 2020 nomination INdemo Jan 2018 #113
That whore couldn't find his spine until he decided to leave the Senate. Fake! RainCaster Jan 2018 #115
But he never VOTES the way he talks! Tatiana Jan 2018 #118
Awed. raven mad Jan 2018 #119
Will he be the Goldwater that eventually invites our Nixon to take a hike or be impeached? PubliusEnigma Jan 2018 #120
Good speech, however actions speak louder than words burrowowl Jan 2018 #124
WOW is so right! mrsadm Jan 2018 #126
great speech but mnmoderatedem Jan 2018 #127
I had been looking forward to this, babylonsister Jan 2018 #128
impeachment isn't on the table bigtree Jan 2018 #131
Sorry, but I'm not impressed. Words are cheap & Flake votes w/45* 95% of the time. catbyte Jan 2018 #129
Basically ConnorMarc Jan 2018 #130
Talk is cheap SoCalDem Jan 2018 #136
piss on jeff flake anyway KG Jan 2018 #137
Flake just voted Thomas Farr out of Committee for a lifetime seat on the Nanjeanne Jan 2018 #139

spooky3

(34,429 posts)
1. An outstanding speech. And long overdue.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:34 AM
Jan 2018

Tune in if you can. He is laying out a strong case for the damage Trump is doing by undermining the freedom of the press and how lying undermines American institutions.

spooky3

(34,429 posts)
15. The minority influence literature in social psych says that
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:40 AM
Jan 2018

You need at least two “deviants” to begin to break down the power of the minority. Who else will step up?

spooky3

(34,429 posts)
38. Thanks. Unfortunately, McCains health may mean he cant
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:12 PM
Jan 2018

Keep pressing together with Flake. And ideally, it should be someone who is staying in the Congress but willing to leave if things do not change. Takes a lot of courage.

 

onit2day

(1,201 posts)
114. Spot on but lacking substance as Flake refuses to stand up to Trump
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 09:20 PM
Jan 2018

and supports him 90% of the time. He just wants his rhetoric to change not his agenda. Another GOP phony but isn't that what "Flake" stands for. In a 51-49 senate Flake has tremendous power to stop unqualified jurors for the federal bench is but one instance Flake to stand up against this would be dictator.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
2. Won't miss him when he retires though.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:35 AM
Jan 2018

Flake's actions are extremely damaging to the country, despite his pretty words.

 

Motownman78

(491 posts)
92. AZ might flip
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 02:44 PM
Jan 2018

With Dem over-performance as shown last night. Dems last night gained an average of 21% from 2016, and HRC only lost AZ by 6 points.

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
89. "Pretty words."
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 02:26 PM
Jan 2018

Last edited Wed Jan 17, 2018, 08:14 PM - Edit history (2)

Are mostly all Flake HAS, because he goes along with Fatso-in-chief's/GOP legislation which is destroying and destabilizing our country.

Flake's sound & fury signifying NOTHING

bench scientist

(1,107 posts)
108. Exactly. The GOP is made up of opportunists and frauds nothing more.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 04:45 PM
Jan 2018

Flake voted for the tax scam.
He’s voted for Trump’s agenda.
This is designed to make Flake look good nothing more.

WyLoochka

(1,629 posts)
135. He has always been very conservative, except on immigration
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 03:54 PM
Jan 2018

He would do huge tax cuts no matter who was President because he believes that supply side trickle down crap. He agrees that the government should not provide health insurance - it should be all private etc.

It is actually Ryan and the Freedom Caucus calling most of the shots - manipulating that obese orange goomba every step of the way. Flake will go with most of it because he has long agreed with most of it. Trump has no influence on him.

Flake has never supported trump, or his own party's xenophobes, on immigration.

NCjack

(10,279 posts)
53. Kabuki theater. Flake will vote for Trump legislative packages
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:39 PM
Jan 2018

and nominees, all built on lies. Flake thinks his speech will position him to run for prez. Not going to happen.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
58. He has legislation right in front of him NOW he could support
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:49 PM
Jan 2018

The bill to bring back Net Neutrality. Supported by a strong majority of voters in BOTH parties.

LisaM

(27,800 posts)
86. I agree - especially because it's essentially tied in to the topic of his speech.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 02:18 PM
Jan 2018

Net Neutrality helps guarantee a free press.

Zoonart

(11,845 posts)
6. Flake is running for President.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:35 AM
Jan 2018

While I applaud any R for speaking out against tRump, I will pay ore attention when Flake stops voting WITH Stalin.

bearsfootball516

(6,376 posts)
50. He would have absolutely no chance
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:35 PM
Jan 2018

He wouldn’t get a single vote from the Trump base, and without them, he wouldn’t have a shot.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
25. +2
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:53 AM
Jan 2018

I'm guessing a lot of Republicans agree with Flake, but they also know that Trump is very weak and easy to manipulate, so they will get their agenda passed and he'll be happy to sign whatever they put in front of him.

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
111. Yep. As horrible as dump is
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 05:34 PM
Jan 2018

the puke agenda is 1000x worse, because it's a comprehensive plan for turning the US into a neofeudal state.

Unless dump pushes the nuclear button. But then we'll all be dead*



*unless the nuke talk is simply a way to frighten the peasantry, which I wouldn't put past this cabal of vandals.


oasis

(49,370 posts)
49. Fox's Howard Kurtz slams Flake after the speech. Foxbots rarely
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:34 PM
Jan 2018

stray from the dictates of their puppet masters.

oasis

(49,370 posts)
46. Basically, Trump's attack on the press is no different than that
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:24 PM
Jan 2018

of despotic tyrants of other nations, and it's dangerous to our American democracy.

spooky3

(34,429 posts)
14. This is not about the speaker. Its about a Republican
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:38 AM
Jan 2018

Correctly describing how Trump is undermining the media and why it’s important. He needs just a few allies to turn the tide.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
13. This is better than nothing and is historical...
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:38 AM
Jan 2018

but he needs to do the other 99% and stop voting with Stalin and stop helping the Republicans.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
16. We need to get over ourselves. Flake will never vote in line with the Democrats.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:40 AM
Jan 2018

But what he IS doing is drawing a line in the sand between GOP Trump backers and GOP Never-Trumpers.

What starts as a slight fissure could evolve into a giant fracture, thereby denuding the Trump effect within the Republican Party.

Yes, we can all chastise Flake for his conservative beliefs, which run counter to our own...but let's applaud him for standing against Trump and his deplorable base as to their fascist tendencies.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
24. that's an important point
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:48 AM
Jan 2018

...eventually, if we're to make any progress addressing the present danger in the WH, we'll need to splinter off some faction of republicans.

Also, there's immeasurable value in vocalizing the criticisms Flake leveled at his president, much more from a member of his own party. At the very least, it's a good counter to the prevailing, destructive politics coming from the WH which is being emulated around the nation.

 

BoneyardDem

(1,202 posts)
36. NPR was interviewing Flake this morning
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:04 PM
Jan 2018

above everything else he is still a Republican. He may despise the methods and madness that is Trump, but he still believes in RW philosophies and standards. He will not vote against those things just to spite Trump. He actually believed the tax plan was good. So he clearly dislikes Trump's administrative methods, dislikes Trump's tarnishing the office of POTUS, but is strongly aligned with Republicans. Why anyone should assume that Flake is supposed to suddenly vote all the time with Dems is totally silly.

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
112. Flake is a
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 05:38 PM
Jan 2018

hard-core libertarian. No ifs, ands, or buts.

I don't doubt that he is sincere in believing that dump is a threat to democracy. He also sincerely believes in the free market fairy tale. Although my suspicion is that these types are just subconsciously covering up their greed.

No winners here.


PatSeg

(47,370 posts)
43. Yes, he is saying what needs to be said
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:21 PM
Jan 2018

regardless of his voting record. He is doing what more republicans need to be doing. They are so afraid of losing Trump's unhinged base, so they'll end up going down with the ship instead. Not an ounce of integrity among them.

Time for change

(13,714 posts)
122. Very well said
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 01:08 AM
Jan 2018

We can applaud his great speech and still criticize or condemn his voting.

Because words DO matter, and they can matter quite a bit. They matter because of the influence they are capable of exerting. And I've heard few speeches in my life that in my opinion have the potential to influence people as much as this one -- coming as it is from a U.S. Senator in Trump's own party -- which is not at all known for vehement criticism of its leaders.

mn9driver

(4,423 posts)
23. Flake thinks Trump is Stalin. But he is still willing to vote for his agenda.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:47 AM
Jan 2018

He is a right wing asshole.

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
28. He actually said this?!!???
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:55 AM
Jan 2018

I'm at work. Walking between buildings and can't see what's going on.

Flake called 140 Stalin?!?

mindfulNJ

(2,367 posts)
27. Doesn't mean shit
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:54 AM
Jan 2018

if he rubber stamps everything in Trump's agenda. He's still a shill for the fascists.

kennetha

(3,666 posts)
31. Enough in there to justify impeachment
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:56 AM
Jan 2018

He laid out a case sufficient to justify impeachment. that is not a small thing.

Response to bigtree (Original post)

wishstar

(5,268 posts)
34. On MSNBC this am, he criticized Trump's dishonesty misrepresenting the facts-BUT
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:03 PM
Jan 2018

Flake then made blanket statement that he does not think Trump has done anything impeachable.

Not consistent to criticize Trump's false statements and then make a premature claim giving Trump benefit of the doubt regarding any impeachable offense, especially after all of Trump & Co. lying and covering up all their Russian contacts and the evidence of attempted obstruction of justice.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
37. what do you do with that assessment, that position?
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:08 PM
Jan 2018

...stamp your feet on DU and turn your back?

Isn't there any value in this career conservative speaking truth to power?

I think you'll be behind the curve dismissing Flake, and, essentially, playing into the hands of others who have an even more direct interest in dismissing what he's said against Trump.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
39. I won't dismiss Flake
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:15 PM
Jan 2018

But talk is notoriously cheap. What concrete actions is Sen. Flake going to take to oppose President Trump? Who on the Republican side of the aisle is going to join a retiring senator, less than a year away from leaving the chamber?

We'll be better able to assess the value of Flake's speech by its sequelae. Sen. Graham had harsh things to say about President Trump once upon a time, too.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
44. Flake is leaving
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:23 PM
Jan 2018

...and I don't expect the republican party to do anything substantial to fix anything.

That's has little to do with the importance or impact of this speech or any other republican speaking this kind of truth to his own president and party.

It's up to US to make something of this. I'd hope we do more than the dirty work of republicans who will be more than satisfied with any cynicism directed at Flake, or with folks who are content dismissing his words.

I daresay, that will likely be the strategy from the right. They're cynical, we're cynical. We feel righteous, and republicans dodge this bullet.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
48. So you're saying that Flakes Fine Speech is directed to Democrats?
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:26 PM
Jan 2018

I disagree. We're miles ahead of where Flake is. He's like a little boy waving his hand as the freight train zooms by.

If Flake's words are going to mean anything, they have to mean something to his Republican colleagues and fellow travelers. If all the other Republicans in Congress hold together, Flake's Fine Speech amounts to bupkis.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
51. politics isn't as static as you describe
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:36 PM
Jan 2018

...and this political speech will have an impact.

His message is directed at whoever is willing to receive it and act on it. I don't think anything worthwhile is served by making this excellent screed against Trump a referendum on Flake.

We should be embracing the moment, but I can see that cynicism is a powerful lure.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
55. As I said, I'm not "dismissing Flake"
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:44 PM
Jan 2018

But if this is a nine hours' wonder and nothing happens afterwards (something we've seen countless times before), then it's another useless gesture by a cynical Republican trying to salvage something of his reputation moments before he heads out the door. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns, as they say in the investment world, but we've seen this from elected officials before. Flake doesn't have a base of credibility for anything for liberals to embrace at this moment.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
59. I 'embrace' Flake's criticisms of Trump today. I endorse what he said
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:50 PM
Jan 2018

...and I don't see any value at all (or logic) in predicating support for his speech on the Senate floor on anything.

He told the truth about Trump, and I endorse that truth. Period.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
61. Well, good for you
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:54 PM
Jan 2018

I don't feel a similar obligation to make anything more of Flake's Fine Speech as a standalone proposition.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
63. yet you took pains to highlight Flake over the truths he spoke today
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:58 PM
Jan 2018

...by that standard of yours, there's no value in ANY republican speaking out against Trump.

I think that's an absurd stance, and antithetical to efforts to confront this president.

Saviolo

(3,280 posts)
97. There is negligible value in ANY republican speaking out against Trump...
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 04:02 PM
Jan 2018

... if they then go around and vote overwhelming in support of him. It may turn a couple of heads of moderate republican voters who will take a good hard look at Trump, but the actual actions of Flake in the chamber have done tangible harm. He voted for all of the different flavors of repeal for the ACA, he voted for the tax scam, he voted to confirm Neil Gorsuch along with pretty much all of Trump's nominees. And then when he opposes Trump it's for things like opposing disaster relief for Puerto Rico.

You can see his voting record here:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/jeff-flake/

So, great, if his speech manages to convince a few moderate Republican voters to stay home instead of voting for Trump, that's great. Until I see some evidence that he gives an actual shit about anything (via his voting record), I'll treat all of these speeches of his as angry exit interviews as he's walking out the door.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
100. so the several discussions about Trump, the press, and his impact on the press around the globe
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 04:22 PM
Jan 2018

...discussions I've listened to in the period following Flake's speech; discussions where Flake's politics wasn't the subject, but Trump was; those discussions have no value?

If you make his remarks a referendum on Flake's republicanism, it's easy and convenient to ignore what he actually said.

Dems: "Why are republicans silent about Trump's attacks on the press; on our Democratic institutions; silent about attacks on investigations into Russian interference into our election?"

Republican Senator: "The president uses words spoken by Josef Stalin."

Dems: "What about your voting record?"


Focus.

Saviolo

(3,280 posts)
110. I didn't say none, I said negligible.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 05:33 PM
Jan 2018

And I don't think the value of his words outstrips the damage of his actions. If you suspect that Flake's words on his way out the door will measurable move the needle in terms of votes for or against Trump, I think you're being naively optimistic. If Trump leaves in disgrace, then he'll be "the only GOP senator that stood up to Trump" in his presidential campaign. If Trump gets a second term, he doesn't care, he's on the way out anyway.

So he can say what everyone can see, that the president is using authoritarian speech in an effort to suppress the press, but he can't vote against the repeal of Net Neutrality, a vastly popular position across voters on both sides of the aisle?

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
116. using that standard
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 09:43 PM
Jan 2018

...there isn't ONE republican whose words would 'outstrip the damage' if they confronted Trump.

We want republicans to act, but there's value in their speaking out. They're not going to automatically become Democrats by doing so, but neither did republicans who eventually voted to impeach Nixon. Besides, it's his republicanism which makes these remarks significant and give them impact.

You should realize that it's primarily on DU and other internet discussion groups where you find folks more focused on Flake than on what he said on the Senate floor about Trump. I think that's a wasted opportunity which really only serves those who want to suppress what Flake said about the president.

Saviolo

(3,280 posts)
133. All Flake is doing is tone policing Trump
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 10:23 AM
Jan 2018

He loves what Trump's doing. He loves the right-wing policies and the far-right judges and the tax cut for the wealthy and corporate donations and Citizens United and all that lovely money from the Kochs and the Mercers. He loves all of it.

He just wishes Trump wouldn't be quite so overtly racist and go back to using dog whistles instead. That's what it boils down to. As long as we let him get some free great PR by pointing out that Trump is being authoritarian and fascist in his words (which is already obvious to anyone not brainwashed into the cult), we're going to keep getting a lot of far-right policies. He's not speaking out against Trump, he's speaking out against Trump's methods. If an identical policy agenda had been passed under President Pence, but he hadn't attacked the press, the conversation would have never happened.

I'm not comfortable giving Flake a pat on the back for pointing out the obvious when his policy agenda is odious and damaging. We can't let his very reasonable (but hardly revelatory) words cover the violence in his voting record.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
134. if he is, he's 'tone policing' poorly
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 10:32 AM
Jan 2018

...ALL of the reports I saw yesterday about Flake's speech on the Senate floor criticizing Trump were presented as a member of his own party attacking him mercilessly.

NONE of them distracted from those attacks on Trump, as some DUers have, to criticize Flake or express ANY cynicism at all about his attacks on the president.

I think you the politics you're focusing on are fine for DU, but it's a bit behind the curve. Most folks are more concerned with confronting Trump than on casting doubt on his critics and accusers.

Stinky The Clown

(67,786 posts)
132. Ah. The old fallback to WhatAboutIsm
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 10:11 AM
Jan 2018

I stand by my comment.

Booker spoke in a way that could well be what you say, but it was consistent with who Booker is.

Flake? Not Even Close.

misanthrope

(7,411 posts)
138. Fine but there's sauce for the goose and gander alike
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 05:07 PM
Jan 2018

I see little difference between the two instances other than their party affiliations. Both were a pair of Beltway veterans taking advantage of the situation for a little p.r. aimed at their personal ambitions. If one is dismissed solely due to the politico's career goals, then the same would apply for the other.

Booker's yen for a presidential race has been talked about for years now. It was obvious he came to the hearing this week prepared to deliver those remarks because he knew it would make the news and would provide useful soundbites. You can see him reading his prepared statements.

Nothing unusual there. That's how Washington works.

The most meaningful difference I see between the two is Flake's membership in the GOP. If him standing up to his party's POTUS can help chip away at the base of support Trump enjoys, if it can embolden others to follow his lead then that is a good thing.

After all, it took a delegation of Republicans heading up Pennsylvania Avenue to get Nixon to exit office. An opposition party isn't going to have the same sway. Trump's bulwarks have to crumble.

I don't like GOP policies. They run counter to my progressive ideals. I vote for Democrats not out of party loyalty but primarily because they espouse plans closer to what I would like to see enacted.

Policies aside, Trump is damaging our nation, its institutions and its discourse in ways that should alarm everyone on both sides of the aisle. I want that solved most of all.

MissKat

(218 posts)
42. Did he just throw his hat into the ring?
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:19 PM
Jan 2018

Is he going to be the alternative Republican??

Me thinks he wants to be president....what say you? DU?

bunny planet

(10,875 posts)
54. flake
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:39 PM
Jan 2018

maybe he can put his money where his mouth is and actually cross the aisle to vote to save net neutrality instead of just making fiery speeches and still voting for every dastardly part of the GOP/trump agenda. We have 50 votes to restore net neutrality (if Collins is actually telling the truth about voting with us that is). We need one more GOP vote desperately. So, Flake, what's it gonna be, are you all talk and no action......

enid602

(8,610 posts)
56. Morons
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:44 PM
Jan 2018

Funny that the few Repubicans speaking up against tRump (e.g., Romney, Mcmullin and Flake) are Mormons. Where are the mainstream evangelicals?

AJT

(5,240 posts)
57. This is important. Flake will still vote for all the GOP bills, he's very conservative,
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:46 PM
Jan 2018

but he is objecting to 45s lies and destruction of our democratic norms. Flake believes in the horrible GOP agenda, but he also believes that the agenda should pass by honest democratic means. He believes in an honest democracy, which all of our elected officials should.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,912 posts)
60. Folks, there is a profound difference between core constitutional principles and political agendas
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 12:52 PM
Jan 2018

I strongly disagree with Flake's completely overt political agenda. On many many issues he is aligned with policy positions compatible with Trump's legislative and executive initiatives. That is both true and important. Flake is no ally when it comes to his ideological priorities.

Flake's speech was not about that. I can oppose Flake strongly on policies and applaud him vigorously on fundamental patriotism. He agrees with most of the Republican legislative agenda, and so I could never support Flake for political office. But I can still applaud him for his passionate defense of core democratic principles and, yes, his courage in defending them loudly against a would be despotic President who is undermining them daily. He has stated truths that no one else sitting in high elected position in the Republican Party has dared to utter.

It is not confusing to me. Flakes's voting record reflects his political priorities. His open opposition to the overt authoritarian posture taken by the man occupying the Oval Office reflects his loyalty to some of the core pillars of our democracy. Full credit where credit is due.

FirstLight

(13,359 posts)
87. THIS
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 02:21 PM
Jan 2018

I don't expect him to change his Republican ways...BUT this is about Patriotism.

...and wasn't it about Patriotism when Repubs finally turned on Nixon? Hopefully this is the crack in the dam that opens the floodgates... (here's hopin')

MuseRider

(34,104 posts)
106. Agreed and thank you.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 04:35 PM
Jan 2018

It is just so easy to knee jerk your way through everything. Thinking has become passe I fear.

matt819

(10,749 posts)
67. Blah, Blah, Blah
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 01:08 PM
Jan 2018

As the article in Slate observes, it's all meaningless unless he starts voting accordingly. So pardon me if I'm not particularly moved by this.

DFW

(54,334 posts)
68. Stalin must have borrowed it from Ibsen
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 01:10 PM
Jan 2018

Although I can't imagine Stalin having read Ibsen, Ibsen's play "En Folkefiende (An Enemy of the People)" was written in 1882. Stalin had no business using the phrase to describe anyone other than himself, anyway, but Ibsen used it and his play as a response to the phony outrage to his previous play, "Ghosts," which had to do with passing down of family shame, something Norwegian society didn't feel was "appropriate" matter for public discussion at the time. Ibsen's work had nothing to do with Gulags, collectivizing agriculture, or making Ukranians bend to a dictator's will. Actually, Ibsen's original intent--to show up hypocrisy in TPTB who use the phrase--applies much more closely to Trump than to Stalin.

Maybe Flake has read Ibsen? If not, he might not like what he reads, as he will find himself on both sides of Ibsen's disputing parties.

davekriss

(4,616 posts)
69. Great speech
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 01:24 PM
Jan 2018

You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.
- Malcolm X

The reverse of this is true, too. Right is right, no matter who does it or says it. Hats off for Jeff Flake and this great speech.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,841 posts)
70. If he said in his speech that he regrets any of his votes,
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 01:27 PM
Jan 2018

then I'd be impressed. If he said that the Trump and Republican agenda is wrong and so long as he's still in office he'll work against it, then I'd have a glimmer of hope.

But nope. All he's saying is that the President says bad things. Big whoop.

Jeff Flake is still no friend of average citizens, let alone Democrats.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
75. that would be the majority of the republican party
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 01:43 PM
Jan 2018

...who aren't going to become Democrats, even if they do come to confront Trump in some significant way.

apnu

(8,751 posts)
74. He's all kinds of brave now that he "retired"
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 01:39 PM
Jan 2018

He's not running for re-election, suddenly he's got brave words. He made some noises before his retirement announcement, but nothing like this.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
77. I agree!!! Touche' to Flake. Voting record or not, at least he's speaking out.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 01:51 PM
Jan 2018

That's more than most other Republicans, who are like dogs at the feet of Trump, grateful for the huge tax cut, or who are frozen with fear of Trump, who has managed to ruin the careers and lives of "disloyal" Republicans...even the powerful Bannon.

diva77

(7,639 posts)
78. Watch what he does, not what he says...
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 01:53 PM
Jan 2018

another rethug hypocrite of the McCain type -- they occasionally say the right thing, but never vote in the same spirit

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
80. better yet
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 01:59 PM
Jan 2018

...watch for what impact his speech on the Senate floor will have on the national discussion of Trump's abuses of our democracy.

I just watched a discussion of a free press which didn't bother to highlight Flake's politics, at all. Instead, the discussion centered around his criticisms of Trump's attack on the press, and the impact of Trump's words and actions around the globe.

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
81. "I cant believe what you say, because I see what you do." James Baldwin
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 02:03 PM
Jan 2018

His first speech was good as well, then he turned around and voted with the rest of republicans.

You say "It's not about this conservative Senator's voting record"...sure it is, you have to back your words or they become useless, they become a lie.

I confess I have not read the speech yet, I will, but Flake is like what the man-child called him, "flaky"

 

aquamarina

(1,865 posts)
82. Nice speech.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 02:04 PM
Jan 2018

It could also apply to many of his fellow Senators and and whole slew of Representatives as well.

GregGilman

(12 posts)
84. The "truth" has been missing from the GOP for a long time
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 02:10 PM
Jan 2018

I find it fascinating Flake lays all blame for mis-information in Trump's lap when the real problem lies in decades of dishonest propaganda by Fox News/Limbaugh/Breitbart/Infowars and the rest of the conservative entertainment network. Trump didn't start rightwing lying. And Trump can't stop rightwing lying. It's baked into today's GOP.

FirstLight

(13,359 posts)
88. Quick question..
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 02:23 PM
Jan 2018

I don't have TV so I'm not watching...

WHERE did this speech take place? On the Senate/House Floor or some other venue?

Just curious, as I think it might make a difference....

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
93. Righteous. Obviously Flake is an intelligent guy.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 02:47 PM
Jan 2018

How, then, can he remain a Republican? That’s something I can’t understand.

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
94. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ), who has compared Trump to Stalin,
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 03:44 PM
Jan 2018

told MSNBC that he still wouldn’t vote to impeach the president.

Any more proof his speech is useless?

Someone with a real conscience doesn't say that, someone who is true to words on that speech will consider the fact and not simply say "I won't do it just 'because'"? Because he is a flake, he is a hypocrite, and he is just trying to make political points, with whom I don't know.

“Talk about premature — how could he know whether or not he would vote to impeach when a case hasn’t been made yet?” Lichtman said.

Read the article, and I hope the History professor is correct:
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/01/history-professor-predicts-mueller-will-reveal-trump-crimes-that-will-shock-the-nation-and-force-gop-to-impeach/

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
99. That is not the issue. To say you will not vote to impeach
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 04:17 PM
Jan 2018

when the reasons for impeachment, when the facts by Muller have not been presented, to say that you will not vote to impeach?

Wait a second, if there is proof and reason to merit an impeachment he is saying that he would dismiss all those? that he just won't impeach? Then why throw two speeches against the guy if all your actions are going to support whatever he does, whatever he says...you are still going to support the guy? What is in his personal agenda?

His words, IMO, mean nothing, those are empty words.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
104. it's absolutely relevant
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 04:30 PM
Jan 2018

...expecting republicans to stop being republicans before we accept them confronting Trump is unrealistic and counterproductive to any effort to hold him accountable.

Do you think republicans voting to impeach Nixon renounced their republicanism beforehand?

No one in the Senate is prejudging the investigation. When evidence emerges from Mueller, the entire Congress will respond.

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
98. This is from Flake's speech
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 04:11 PM
Jan 2018

"And a Congress that fails to act as a check on the president adds to the danger."

And he doesn't want to Impeach??? What a contradiction...

When Flake says he won't impeach, does the following paragraph hold any weight?

"And Mr. President, an American president who cannot take criticism -- who must constantly deflect and distort and distract -- who must find someone else to blame -- is charting a very dangerous path. "

Where is the danger? Flake and others won't dare to impeach, so why should the man-child be afraid of his party, which happens to hold the majority in both houses?

dobleremolque

(489 posts)
96. Flake personifies British politician Iain Bank's comment...
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 03:58 PM
Jan 2018

(Modified here to fit USA...)

"I'm not arguing there are no decent people in the Tory [Republican] Party, but they're like bits of sweetcorn in a turd: technically they've kept their integrity, but they're still embedded in shit."

BobTheSubgenius

(11,562 posts)
105. I VERY much hope his words have at least some effect.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 04:31 PM
Jan 2018

However, in terms of his own legacy, he's gained an asterisk, and that's about it. If he has any concern about that, as well as any concern for the country, I kinda wish he would run again.

If beaten by a Dem, all well and good...to say the least.

If the less-desirable outcome of Flake retaining his seat is the outcome, at least he might have a greater and greater number redeeming moments like this in the future.

If nothing else, Flake running would at least make the GOP primary process a total gong show.

Golden Raisin

(4,608 posts)
107. Despite the speech he remains a reliable Republican vote.
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 04:44 PM
Jan 2018

Sad that a Republican is speaking out with such vehemence rather than Pelosi or Schumer.

RainCaster

(10,857 posts)
115. That whore couldn't find his spine until he decided to leave the Senate. Fake!
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 09:28 PM
Jan 2018

He is just as big a phony as any other Republican.

Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
118. But he never VOTES the way he talks!
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 10:07 PM
Jan 2018

At the end of the day, like Collins, he falls in line when it really matters.

His talk is very cheap. I'll be glad when he is gone and the seat is held by a Democrat.

mrsadm

(1,198 posts)
126. WOW is so right!
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 04:47 AM
Jan 2018

Thank you for posting this ... I had no idea that anyone in Congress could even say this ...

mnmoderatedem

(3,724 posts)
127. great speech but
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 07:09 AM
Jan 2018

Flake knows he's not seeking reelection, so he's safe in making this type of speech.

I want to see a republican who IS seeking reelection grow something resembling a backbone and do something similar.

babylonsister

(171,054 posts)
128. I had been looking forward to this,
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 08:21 AM
Jan 2018

but heard Flake on Morning Joe taking impeachment off the table prior to giving the speech.
So, what kind of commitment to his words does that suggest? Meh.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
131. impeachment isn't on the table
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 10:00 AM
Jan 2018

...because Mueller hasn't come forward with his findings.

Besides, how many Democrats are committed right now to impeachment? I'm not getting this as a standard for republicans speaking out against Trump. If we hone to the notion that there's no value in their speaking out because of their republicanism, there isn't one of them that will pass the test.

Flake's the hammer on all of the news shows I saw reporting this, and Trump is the nail. Not ONE distracted from the criticisms Flake leveled about Trump's attacks on the press to focus on his own record. That's how it should be, Flake, however compromised or hypocritical, is not the clear and present danger that Trump represents. Nor is he some sort of flash point that we should be spending our time ripping apart.

He's retiring, and it's really only going to serve those who want to distract from his criticisms of Trump, those who want to muddle and divide the opposition, to make Flake's republicanism the issue instead of his speaking truth to power.

 

ConnorMarc

(653 posts)
130. Basically
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 09:32 AM
Jan 2018

His words are hollow.
I don't care what they say, I care what they do.
And Flake's deeds are terrible.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
136. Talk is cheap
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 03:58 PM
Jan 2018

Republicans are famous for turning human once they are truly lame ducks or decide to retire.

Absent those things, they are line-up toadies..

Had Flake & McCain voiced their recent thoughts just before they voted NO on that tax scheme, I might have had a small bit of respect for them..

too little...too late

Nanjeanne

(4,935 posts)
139. Flake just voted Thomas Farr out of Committee for a lifetime seat on the
Thu Jan 18, 2018, 05:29 PM
Jan 2018

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. Farr helped draft NC’s extreme voter suppression law, one of the most restrictive in history. Civil rights leaders have been protesting loudly against this appointment.

Screw Flake. We need to pay attention to what politicians advocate for by what they vote for and not by words that mean little in people’s real world. If Flake votes for Trump’s unqualified judges, his words against Trump mean nothing to me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wow, wow, wow! Flake!