General Discussion

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts) Wed Jan 17, 2018, 09:28 PM Jan 2018

Did the WH tell Bannon to invoke executive privilege? "No," Chief of Staff Kelly

Link to tweet

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did the WH tell Bannon to invoke executive privilege? "No," Chief of Staff Kelly (Original Post) L. Coyote Jan 2018 OP

The WH gets confused easily. BigmanPigman Jan 2018 #1

Not 'executive privilege,' elleng Jan 2018 #2

John "Empty Barrel" Kelly. oasis Jan 2018 #3

When has the WH told the truth? Iliyah Jan 2018 #4

Who in the White House could override Chief of Staff Kelly? Generic Brad Jan 2018 #5

Please. tymorial Jan 2018 #6

Then he is in contempt of congress isn't he? bitterross Jan 2018 #7

Exactly. This isn't over yet. L. Coyote Jan 2018 #9

Nunes probably was fully aware bluestarone Jan 2018 #8

if the wh can shield witnesses from any investigation, then we as a nation are truly wiggs Jan 2018 #10

BigmanPigman

(51,585 posts)

1. The WH gets confused easily.

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Wed Jan 17, 2018, 09:34 PM

Jan 2018

Miller and Kelly are interchangeable. Racist liars.

elleng

(130,865 posts)

2. Not 'executive privilege,'

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Wed Jan 17, 2018, 09:40 PM

Jan 2018

'just don't answer the question(s.)'

oasis

(49,378 posts)

3. John "Empty Barrel" Kelly.

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Wed Jan 17, 2018, 09:40 PM

Jan 2018

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)

4. When has the WH told the truth?

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Wed Jan 17, 2018, 09:48 PM

Jan 2018

And I'm still waiting on that video tape of the shithole meeting.

Generic Brad

(14,274 posts)

5. Who in the White House could override Chief of Staff Kelly?

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Wed Jan 17, 2018, 09:52 PM

Jan 2018

Somebody had to trump him on this. I wonder who it could have been?

I just wonder.

tymorial

(3,433 posts)

6. Please.

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Wed Jan 17, 2018, 09:53 PM

Jan 2018

They're all liars and they can't even keep their story straight. I fucking hate every single one of them

bitterross

(4,066 posts)

7. Then he is in contempt of congress isn't he?

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Wed Jan 17, 2018, 10:28 PM

Jan 2018

I'm not a lawyer, but if he refused to answer and the WH didn't tell him to use privilege then wouldn't that be grounds for contempt?

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)

9. Exactly. This isn't over yet.

Reply to bitterross (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 17, 2018, 11:49 PM

Jan 2018

But, will Republicans vote to cite him for contempt if his answers are not forthcoming? Not the way they've been circling the Lear jets of late.

bluestarone

(16,916 posts)

8. Nunes probably was fully aware

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Wed Jan 17, 2018, 10:47 PM

Jan 2018

wiggs

(7,812 posts)

10. if the wh can shield witnesses from any investigation, then we as a nation are truly

Reply to L. Coyote (Original post)

Thu Jan 18, 2018, 12:24 AM

Jan 2018

screwed

they shouldn't be able to, but the constitution didn't figure on 1) a malignant sociopathic narcissist in power 2) a complicit congress that prizes party over anything else 3) citizens united 4) a foreign adversary pulling the strings

Reply to this discussion