Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHuffPo: The Case For The Democratic 'Cave' - it's not a cave if you're just continuing the fight
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/democrat-cave-shutdown-immigration_us_5a665efbe4b002283005c4caBut the truth is more complex than a winners and losers post. Yes, the liberal base may be upset that Democrats took less than a DACA fix in exchange for ending a shutdown, but thats only relevant if you actually think Democrats could have gotten a DACA bill as a result of this shutdown ― and that the shutdown wasnt hurting Democrats at all.
Republicans were happy to claim throughout this three-day government funding lapse that Democrats had made a strategic error in blocking a government funding bill, so its odd that, in GOP eyes, Democrats had also made an error in ending the shutdown. How is it that a shutdown was bad for moderate Democratic senators up for reelection and that ending a shutdown is also bad for those lawmakers?
Its also inaccurate to say Democrats didnt get anything over the last couple of days. McConnell made stronger statements in support of an open debate on a DACA bill on both Sunday night and Monday morning, making it more difficult for him to wriggle out of not putting forward an immigration bill that has Democratic support or controlling the amendment process so that Democrats dont have a chance to change the bill.
If ― as progressives were happy to tweet Monday ― Democrats shouldnt trust McConnell, forcing him to make more explicit promises on the Senate floor, promises that will surely be thrown back in his face should he fail to live up to them and there is another shutdown, that isnt to be taken for granted. And if the Senate were able to pass a bipartisan DACA bill, while also demonstrating that a more conservative DACA bill currently making its way through the House doesnt have the votes in the Senate, they make it much easier to argue that its Republicans like Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) who are shutting down the government by not giving Democrats a vote in the House.
The Democratic position of not voting for a government funding bill until theres a DACA deal seems much more reasonable if theres actual legislation thats passed the Senate and is being ignored in the House. Youd be certain to hear the words, Give us a vote, Mr. Speaker!
The reality of this shutdown standoff is that its hardly over. Democrats agreed to a continuing resolution that will keep the government open for 17 days. They took the Childrens Health Insurance Program off the negotiating table with a six-year extension of the program. And they gave up hardly any leverage to do so.
-snip-
Some of the most disappointed groups after this shutdown, understandably, are Dreamers, the undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children. But a prolonged shutdown could have seriously damaged public opinion on the Dreamers. Currently, Dreamers enjoy massive support. A Washington Post-ABC poll in September revealed that 86 percent of the public supported Dreamers staying in the U.S. A long shutdown over immigration could have poisoned public opinion on the issue and driven people into their familiar partisan foxholes, as well as made it difficult for more moderate Republicans to actually negotiate a DACA bill.
-snip-
So Democrats staved off the worst effects of a government shutdown. They prevented a turn in public opinion against their party for this shutdown, as well as Dreamers. They got CHIP. They got a commitment from McConnell to bring up immigration legislation. And they gave up none of their leverage.
It may be tempting to insist that Democrats should have pressed on with the shutdown strategy until they got everything they wanted. But Congress works slowly ― barely ― until the moment that it all comes together in an instant.
Democrats took a step toward that moment.
Republicans were happy to claim throughout this three-day government funding lapse that Democrats had made a strategic error in blocking a government funding bill, so its odd that, in GOP eyes, Democrats had also made an error in ending the shutdown. How is it that a shutdown was bad for moderate Democratic senators up for reelection and that ending a shutdown is also bad for those lawmakers?
Its also inaccurate to say Democrats didnt get anything over the last couple of days. McConnell made stronger statements in support of an open debate on a DACA bill on both Sunday night and Monday morning, making it more difficult for him to wriggle out of not putting forward an immigration bill that has Democratic support or controlling the amendment process so that Democrats dont have a chance to change the bill.
If ― as progressives were happy to tweet Monday ― Democrats shouldnt trust McConnell, forcing him to make more explicit promises on the Senate floor, promises that will surely be thrown back in his face should he fail to live up to them and there is another shutdown, that isnt to be taken for granted. And if the Senate were able to pass a bipartisan DACA bill, while also demonstrating that a more conservative DACA bill currently making its way through the House doesnt have the votes in the Senate, they make it much easier to argue that its Republicans like Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) who are shutting down the government by not giving Democrats a vote in the House.
The Democratic position of not voting for a government funding bill until theres a DACA deal seems much more reasonable if theres actual legislation thats passed the Senate and is being ignored in the House. Youd be certain to hear the words, Give us a vote, Mr. Speaker!
The reality of this shutdown standoff is that its hardly over. Democrats agreed to a continuing resolution that will keep the government open for 17 days. They took the Childrens Health Insurance Program off the negotiating table with a six-year extension of the program. And they gave up hardly any leverage to do so.
-snip-
Some of the most disappointed groups after this shutdown, understandably, are Dreamers, the undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children. But a prolonged shutdown could have seriously damaged public opinion on the Dreamers. Currently, Dreamers enjoy massive support. A Washington Post-ABC poll in September revealed that 86 percent of the public supported Dreamers staying in the U.S. A long shutdown over immigration could have poisoned public opinion on the issue and driven people into their familiar partisan foxholes, as well as made it difficult for more moderate Republicans to actually negotiate a DACA bill.
-snip-
So Democrats staved off the worst effects of a government shutdown. They prevented a turn in public opinion against their party for this shutdown, as well as Dreamers. They got CHIP. They got a commitment from McConnell to bring up immigration legislation. And they gave up none of their leverage.
It may be tempting to insist that Democrats should have pressed on with the shutdown strategy until they got everything they wanted. But Congress works slowly ― barely ― until the moment that it all comes together in an instant.
Democrats took a step toward that moment.
Editing to add that I found this thanks to Ezra Klein retweeting Matt Fuller's post about it:
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1051 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HuffPo: The Case For The Democratic 'Cave' - it's not a cave if you're just continuing the fight (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Jan 2018
OP
You're welcome! I thought this column did a great job summarizing why the short-term shutdown helps
highplainsdem
Jan 2018
#4
Cha
(296,867 posts)1. Thank you, highplainsdem!
But the truth is more complex than a winners and losers post. Yes, the liberal base may be upset that Democrats took less than a DACA fix in exchange for ending a shutdown, but thats only relevant if you actually think Democrats could have gotten a DACA bill as a result of this shutdown ― and that the shutdown wasnt hurting Democrats at all.
highplainsdem
(48,917 posts)4. You're welcome! I thought this column did a great job summarizing why the short-term shutdown helps
Dems.
Cha
(296,867 posts)6. It does.. and I don't want it
to be ignored
Thank you!
Cha
(296,867 posts)2. An another thing..
The reality of this shutdown standoff is that its hardly over. Democrats agreed to a continuing resolution that will keep the government open for 17 days. They took the Childrens Health Insurance Program off the negotiating table with a six-year extension of the program. And they gave up hardly any leverage to do so.
highplainsdem
(48,917 posts)5. Very important point.
Cha
(296,867 posts)7. Yes, that doesn't seem to
be resonating with some critics.
highplainsdem
(48,917 posts)3. Ezra Klein on The Last Word right now.