General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPierce: Mueller Is Asking Questions. He Knows the Answers.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a15856780/mueller-sessions-comey/Mueller Is Asking Questions. He Knows the Answers.
Jeff Sessions and James Comey were both interviewed by the Special Counsel.
By Charles P. Pierce
Jan 23, 2018
Any morning when you wake up and discover that the sitting Attorney General of the United States has been questioned by a special prosecutor on the subject of the president*s complicity with thugs, hoodlums, international brigands, and Russian ratfckers is a day begun well, at least for scurvy political blogging types. From CNN:
This story emerged at just about the same moment as the exclusive Axios report that Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III , at the urging of the president*, had been pressuring FBI director Christopher Wray to fire deputy director Andrew McCabe, only to have Wray discover his inner Eliot Richardson and tell both JeffBo and JeffBos boss to pound sand.
And, of course, all of this takes place in the context of a general conservative assault on the FBI that runs from the incomprehensible toolhood of Devin Nunes and his magic memo to Sean Hannitys nightly manic episodes. A good portion of the country already believes that James Comey was in the tank for Hillary Rodham Clinton, which she should find perpetually amusing. This frenzied activity on all fronts indicates to the casual observer that Muellers people are asking their witnesses a lot of unsettling questions for which Mueller and his team already know the answers. The question remaining is how many people will believe those answers when they finally are revealed.
UPDATE (3 p.m.)Michael Schmidt of The New York Times has updated his story about the Sessions interview with the news that James Comey was interviewed, too.
The interview with Mr. Comey focused on a series of memos he wrote about his interactions with Mr. Trump that unnerved Mr. Comey. In one memo, Mr. Comey said that Mr. Trump had asked him to end the F.B.I.s investigation into the former national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn.
This does not sound good for JeffBo, either.
Cha
(297,136 posts)Hekate
(90,642 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... already knows the answers to every question he's going to ask. Each interview is something of a trap. The person being interviewed risks being caught in a lie and facing prosecution for lying under oath or for obstruction... OR... the interviewee can confirm what Mueller knows and possibly add more details.
The typical evasive responses, and non-responses, and outright lies and misrepresentations that politicians use effectively during media appearances and when speaking to their constituents, IS NOT a good strategy to use with Mueller.
Wounded Bear
(58,645 posts)By now, Mueller is probably seeking verification rather than any new info.
One way or the other, he's circling the White House, searching out weak points.
kentuck
(111,078 posts)And then make the decision as to which sounded the most honest and truthful.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,563 posts)babylonsister
(171,056 posts)They're next!
MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)PLEASE be so!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mcar
(42,300 posts)gibraltar72
(7,503 posts)Sessions is probably about to ask to amend his testimony.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,563 posts)louis-t
(23,291 posts)pecosbob
(7,535 posts)there can only two reasons; to corroborate claims or statements obtained from other sources (unlikely that he would answer any questions honestly as he would only implicate himself), or to get a witness on record for perjury.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Farmer-Rick
(10,154 posts)Really? They believe the guy who released a letter about Hillary's missing emails right before the country voted on her, or the ass-hole they got, was in the tank for the person he disparaged? Really, are Americans that stupid?
babylonsister
(171,056 posts)in the eyes of dt supporters works regardless of how based in fantasy it is.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,563 posts)Clearly, not ALL Americans are that stupid - present company excepted, obviously - but enough to do damage. They've been voting against their own interests for a few decades now (and in the past, but I'm talking about modern history), in spite of objective evidence that counters their flimsy beliefs.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)And he lies to Franken about something he wasn't asked about!
TomSlick
(11,096 posts)Anytime a lawyer asks you a question, s/he not only knows the answer, s/he can prove it.