Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumshow would the gun control debate be different if the shooter had been a radical muslim carrying out
jihad? I mean someone who had the pedigree: home to Pakistan and trained, etc. And also bought his guns legally here like Holmes did.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1268 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
how would the gun control debate be different if the shooter had been a radical muslim carrying out (Original Post)
arely staircase
Jul 2012
OP
catbyte
(34,326 posts)1. None. They would have doubled down on the racial profiling.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)5. for sure they double down on racial profiling
So let's. Say some wingnut like gomhert calls for a (clearly unconstitutional) law that prohibits people on the "terrorist watchlist" from purchasing a gun. What does the NRA do?
Still Sensible
(2,870 posts)2. The debate would not change at all
The NRA and their political puppets still control the debate....
In your example, the NRA and right wing would be screaming--see Obama can't keep you safe!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)6. i know that is what they would be screaming but
would it work or would the general population have reached a tipping point and be more supportive of tighter gun laws?
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)3. None at all. We already know that answer.
The assault weapons ban was allowed to expire only a few years after 9/11
leveymg
(36,418 posts)4. The talking head discussions would be about how to round up and control muslims, not guns
Who soon we forget.