Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(268,960 posts)
Sun Jan 28, 2018, 03:40 PM Jan 2018

Pssssssssssssst! Grounds for impeachment if Trump lied about trying to fire Mueller Ken Starr

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/28/trump-robert-mueller-russia-ken-starr
<snip>
Independent counsel who investigated Bill Clinton says: ‘Lying to the American people is a serious issue that has to be explored’
If Donald Trump lied to the American people when he called reports he tried to fire Robert Mueller “fake news”, that would be grounds for impeachment, the independent counsel who investigated the Clinton White House said on Sunday.

Ken Starr, who used Bill Clinton’s false statements about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky as grounds for impeachment, told ABC’s This Week: “Lying to the American people is a serious issue that has to be explored. I take lying to the American people very, very seriously, so absolutely.”

Starr said: “That is something Bob Mueller should look at.”

Mueller, the special counsel, is investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election, including alleged collusion between Russian officials and Trump aides, and numerous instances of possible obstruction of justice by the president.
----------------------
Now I detest Ken Starr but it would be 'delish' for his love of the phrase 'fake news' to finally fuck him up!!
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
7. Oh honey, there are so many grounds already
Sun Jan 28, 2018, 03:58 PM
Jan 2018

It's like a Starbucks exploded in the WH. Aren't there something like 64 emoluments violations? GOP congress has been exceedingly lenient, giving him dozens of mulligans and blatantly overlooking the illegality of half of everything he does.

madville

(7,408 posts)
8. The same Ken Starr that thought perjury was an impeachable offense also but
Sun Jan 28, 2018, 04:01 PM
Jan 2018

was proven wrong about that as well. No Ken, simply lying to the public or media is not an impeachable offense if actual perjury has been proven not to be.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
10. I saw Ken Starr this morning up against Dan Abrams on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" and
Sun Jan 28, 2018, 04:57 PM
Jan 2018

I just wanted to punch his lights out. He was so obnoxious! Finally Martha Raddatz got him on the fact that he tried to bust Clinton on "lying" to the American people so eventually he had to admit that if Trump lied to the American people, that he too was subject to legal action, but up until she challenged him, he wouldn't back down and basically said DT had done nothing wrong. He was such an arrogant prick. Dan Abrams did a good job, but Starr was such a dickhead he was too stupid to know how stupid he was being.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
12. Yes! I was so glad she called him on it because he was so smug up until that point and Dan Abrams
Sun Jan 28, 2018, 05:08 PM
Jan 2018

was getting so exasperated with him because he just wouldn't back down even though he was wrong. He was such an arrogant, stupid fucktard. I wanted to throw something at the television. Martha did a good job though! Wish you all could have seen it!

Takket

(21,563 posts)
13. i hate to be a wet blanket but..........
Sun Jan 28, 2018, 05:21 PM
Jan 2018

obstruction without proof of collusion doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of everygetting past the House in an impeachment vote.

as it is, even if mueller brings proof that drumpf is guilty of working with Russia, the prospects of him being impeached are not good. but if all we can bring to the table is "well we can't prove the russia thing but drumpf did try to obstruct us from looknig into the collusion that it turns out we can't prove"..... uh... no way. Congress is NEVER impeaching over simple obstruction without proof of an underlying crime that drumpf was trying to avoid being discovered.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pssssssssssssst! Grounds...