Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMITCH MCCONNELL says he sees no need for a bill to protect Bob Mueller
Once again, we can not expect any help from Congress. damn
Kasie Hunt
?Verified account @kasie
2h2 hours ago
MITCH MCCONNELL says he sees no need for a bill to protect Bob Mueller
Im unaware of any effort, official effort, by the White House to undermine the special counsel, says he sees no need to bring up legislation to protect someone who doesnt need protection.
698 replies 827 retweets 1,146 likes
Link to tweet
Eric Smith
? @porcelainthrone
2h2 hours ago
Replying to @kasie
Translation: Mitch is in on the plot.
6 replies 28 retweets 490 likes
Devon Sheetcake
🍰
? @DevonOhara
2h2 hours ago
This.
He held SCOTUS seat
He silenced exposure
He is an infiltrator, bought and paid for.
5 replies 24 retweets 229 likes
Trace Vickrey
? @WithoutaTRACE
2h2 hours ago
No doubt!
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likes
🌊 Blu Orb
🌊
🌎
? @jrmint4
2h2 hours ago
Republican Party should be renamed the Koch Party for transparency.
And Citizens United seems to mean unlimited foreign donations are welcome.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 981 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MITCH MCCONNELL says he sees no need for a bill to protect Bob Mueller (Original Post)
riversedge
Jan 2018
OP
Eliot Rosewater
(31,106 posts)1. T R A I T O R
Freethinker65
(9,999 posts)2. No surprise
Vinca
(50,236 posts)3. He must mean Comrade Mitch.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)4. Mitch got him some of that DIRTY money too!
You ain't fooling no one Mitch. Laundered through the NRA maybe?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)5. Team Mueller must be getting close
to the Turtle's Money Trail.
BigmanPigman
(51,565 posts)6. WE MUST WIN THE MIDTERMS!
Salviati
(6,008 posts)7. Moscow Mitch?
Retrograde
(10,128 posts)8. And his wife just happens to have a cabinet post
just pointing that out.
Golden Raisin
(4,605 posts)9. Anyone shocked?
Cha
(296,821 posts)10. You're "unaware" of a Whole Shit Lot, turtle brain..
strike that. Turtles are smarter.
bluestarone
(16,859 posts)11. so fucking worthless
0rganism
(23,924 posts)12. what a surprise!
shocked, shocked am i, that the Republican senate majority leader would prioritize partisanship over national security