Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEconomists on Boehner/Republican job bills: "laughable," "silly season"
Among competing jobs plans, it's not even close
By Steve Benen
<...>
Gary Burtless, a senior economist at Brookings, went so far as to call many of the bills touted by Boehner as "laughable."
Jesse Rothstein, an economics professor at UC Berkeley added, "It's game playing to try to pretend like they're doing something. It's silly season, and so they know they have to put up something that has the label 'job creation' on it, whether or not it would work."
<...>
The truth is, however, we've already seen this kind of analysis. Remember, immediately after Obama presented his plan in September, independent analysis concluded the Americans Jobs Act would have a significant and positive effect. From an AP report published at the time:
Macroeconomic Advisers wasn't quite as optimistic, but its analysis projected that the White House plan "would give a significant boost to GDP and employment over the near-term." The firm would expect to see the proposal create at least 1.3 million jobs.
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/25/12948731-among-competing-jobs-plans-its-not-even-close
By Steve Benen
<...>
Gary Burtless, a senior economist at Brookings, went so far as to call many of the bills touted by Boehner as "laughable."
Jesse Rothstein, an economics professor at UC Berkeley added, "It's game playing to try to pretend like they're doing something. It's silly season, and so they know they have to put up something that has the label 'job creation' on it, whether or not it would work."
<...>
The truth is, however, we've already seen this kind of analysis. Remember, immediately after Obama presented his plan in September, independent analysis concluded the Americans Jobs Act would have a significant and positive effect. From an AP report published at the time:
A tentative thumbs-up. That was the assessment Thursday night from economists who offered mainly positive reviews of President Barack Obama's $450 billion plan to stimulate job creation. [...]
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, estimated that the president's plan would boost economic growth by 2 percentage points, add 2 million jobs and reduce unemployment by a full percentage point next year compared with existing law.
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, estimated that the president's plan would boost economic growth by 2 percentage points, add 2 million jobs and reduce unemployment by a full percentage point next year compared with existing law.
Macroeconomic Advisers wasn't quite as optimistic, but its analysis projected that the White House plan "would give a significant boost to GDP and employment over the near-term." The firm would expect to see the proposal create at least 1.3 million jobs.
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/25/12948731-among-competing-jobs-plans-its-not-even-close
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1160 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Economists on Boehner/Republican job bills: "laughable," "silly season" (Original Post)
ProSense
Jul 2012
OP
ProSense
(116,464 posts)1. Kick! n/t
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)2. Posted this to my local daily rag's on-line comment section ...
To counter a rwinger's "32 gop jobs plan collecting dust in the Senate" remark.
Response so far:
CRICKETS
Stay tuned ...
BumRushDaShow
(128,391 posts)3. I know everyone is missing Rachael
But at least she is still blogging.
byeya
(2,842 posts)4. We've had 30+ years of supply side failure. Keynsianism worked in the 1930s and 1940s
so I'd say both have been tested. One failed, one succeeded.
Time to go with the proven program.