General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLet me say it again, "No, assholes, you didn't build it by yourself."
Somewhere, you learned to read. Maybe you even went to a public school? Maybe you learned everything you know from a private education? Maybe your teacher went to a public school?
Even if you are the world's greatest propagandist on the world's largest radio stations, somebody gave you a break somewhere.
Maybe you got a loan from the SBA (Small Business Administration) to start your business? Maybe you bought a truck and hired a driver and a mechanic and paid them the going wage? Maybe they helped you to make enough of a profit to buy ten more trucks and so you hired more drivers and more mechanics?
Maybe you drove on the highways that all Americans helped to build everytime they purchased gasoline? Yes, the wealthy contributed just like everyone else when they bought gasoline. But their share was nowhere near enough to build their own highway or bridges. Their business depends on all of us to keep an infrastructure of water, electricity, roads, and an educated work force.
Maybe you built a pizza business or a computer business? Chances are you did not put the computer together by yourself and you did not bake the pizza by yourself and you did not deliver either of them to a customer.
The right-wing media is in an uproar today over the comments by the President that "you did not build it yourself." How dare he! Well, the President was right, assholes. Even Bill Gates had to borrow the $1000 that he paid someone else who created the computer program that made him a multi-billionaire. Nobody made it on their own. They either got money from Daddy and Mommy or they got help someplace else. Maybe they got grants and loans for their college education?
Let's have this debate. It would be good for America.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)What else is there to say.
kentuck
(111,076 posts)Who were their teachers? Nobody does it alone.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)It's the heart of the problem. Greed versus sharing.
The funny thing is, the world works in nonintuitive ways. Legalizing drugs in one of the South American countries has resulted in less crime, less addiction.
Republicans are like that monkey with his hand in the coconut. Just let go!
kentuck
(111,076 posts)than the average middle class guy on his income. Where do these people get the idea that their money is worth more than the money of any other hard working American?
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)That's what this is about, when you strip it down, which we should.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Pholus
(4,062 posts)"I thought back to Newton and to Leibnitz and to problems just like this...."
And yes, I apologize in advance...
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Pholus
(4,062 posts)People don't appreciate things like this nearly enough!
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)usually a wife, who took care of the house, the kids, everything else, and helped you out on the side while you ignored her and the kids and worked 20 hours a day.
Remember her? That would be the wife you dumped once you made your first million so you could trade her in for a newer model.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)...is proof of society and government's role in the many "individual" success stories in the United States.
I know of no single upper or middle class American who has NOT benefited enormously by using PUBLIC services, or who was not molded by society-parents, public school teachers, role models, friends, family, colleagues.No man (or woman) is an island.
Now, notice the people who I left out from being benefited-the poor, along with other members of disenfranchised or oppressed groups, such as the LGBT community or non-white Americans. They don't benefit nearly to the extent of your typical white middle class small business owner who thinks they have "built everything themselves." But even some of them have moved into the middle and upper classes, with a combination of social justice movements and government action.
The point is, the most privileged groups in America are entirely hypocritical when they tell the truly underprivileged that they, the businessmen and "entrepreneurs", got where they are without any help. That betrays their privileged mindset, not to mention their ignorance of just how much help they have gotten.
OneTenthofOnePercent
(6,268 posts)You see, any American in a given time period has the same market conditions (demand, technology, and public infrastructure) as everybody else. So what's the diffrence between a sucessful business and a failed business? The difference is the CHOICES made by the business owners... THEY made their businesses possible through their choices using the building blocks of society that were available to everybody.
It's not the toil and fruits of society that make a sucessful business, otherwise we would all be sucessful buisiness owners seing as the benefites of society are avalable to all of us. It is rather the construct and action of entrepreneurs that use the tools society gives us to build more than what was there before. It is the business, in the abstract, that they themselves have managed to create.
If they are lucky then their choices, business, and legacy will outlest them and perhaps be inherited by another to continue.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)How educated your mother is, how much money your father makes, what kind of school you attend, the character of the neighborhood you live in, if you're lucky enough to have white skin, if you are straight or at least in the closet...being male helps, too.
And no, the benefits of society are not available to all of us, otherwise wealth and resources would be more evenly distributed.
kentuck
(111,076 posts)Did these building blocks just appear out of thin air? Who made these "building blocks"? And what type of building blocks are you thinking about??
I would disagree that "any American in a given time period has the same market conditions (demand, technology, and public infrastructure) as everybody else."
A very poor man has less possibility of using the system to create a successful business than does a wealthy person who perhaps has a lot of wealth handed down to him. They are not on a level playing field, no matter how much we would like to think they are.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)Two infrastructure examples:
When the fire department comes to my house, there is no need to bring more than a couple of trucks, maybe another for backup. Putting out a full blown fire on a McMansion can take a few more fire trucks. If the McMansion owner has a large corporation, and should that catch fire it might take in more than a few fire departments just to contain the blaze!
We should not pay the same in taxes for what amounts to be unequal protection. He gets much more from the commons than I, he should pay much more for that.
Although my tax dollars go to keeping a navy out there to keep our shipping lanes open, I profit only in what I am able to purchase by doing this. The corporatist importers and exporters profit much much more than I by our tax dollars being spent this way. They should be spending much more of a percentage of what they profit in taxes in order to reap those increased profits.
MrDiaz
(731 posts)could not provide or do any of these things if not for the tax payers...and china of course. lol
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)"if not for the tax payers and China"...Ummmm
Patiod
(11,816 posts)And she had been running for our state university's board of trustees.
Yes. Public high school AND state university, and she thinks she did it all herself.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)like a bridge, road, public school, etc... and getting specific help that others did not (like a government grant or financial backing from one's parents)?
If you want to go to the lowest possible level, no one conceived or gave birth to themselves, so technically no one got anywhere on their own.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)"You think you were so smart?"
"You think you worked harder than anyone else?"
I believe he alienated a lot of small business owners where it wasn't necessary. All the back tracking and explaining in the world is not going to fix that.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)The phrasing he used left it open to selective parsing and a wide range of interpretations.
kentuck
(111,076 posts)Because it is true. They think they are smarter and work harder and are more deserving.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)kentuck
(111,076 posts)...think they are smarter and work harder and are more deserving.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)hard work and an excellent knowledge of the particular business? I mean, 50% of small businesses fail. There must a discriminating factor or factors involved in that failure rate.
kentuck
(111,076 posts)and being in the right place at the right time. Some people simple do not want to run a business. Not because they are not intelligent enough or knowledgeable about the business, they simply don't have the inclination to be in that line of work. Business owners are not smarter and they do not work harder than everyone else, they have a certain attitude toward wealth and wealth creation that some people just aren't that interested in. It is rather boring, in many instances. Making money, just to make money, does not require any special inspiration or education, it mostly requires a simple attitude.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)"The harder I work, the luckier I seem to get." Most of the business owners I know had a combination of smarts, hard work, and luck. They also made the most of opportunities presented to them. Those business owners are generally the ones not in the 50% that fail.
kentuck
(111,076 posts)But, no doubt, they work hard at getting hard workers.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)But that's okay Kentuk, you keep denigrating the small businessperson. I think the President made a huge mistake in doing so, and you seem to be doubling down on that error. Why, I'm not sure. It won't win anyone any votes this November.
kentuck
(111,076 posts)If they grew their business, chances are they hired someone to help them do the labor. In other words, they didn't do it by themselves. That is the point of the post. If they want to continue to believe they did, someone should continue to point out that we don't have a caste system in this country where we have the Job Creators and we have the Untouchables. They are not smarter and they don't work harder, as a general rule.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)capital (in most cases) to pay that person. But that's okay, Kentuck, you keep pounding on the small business owners in this country. I'm sure they'll come around to our side in November for it.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)You might want to look at the facts rather than polishing that idol. Opening a business is risky, expensive, and can wash you out if you don't have a backup. I work at a successful small business...or rather, it was, until the Bush era and the economic crisis. Now the owner of 20 years panicks every time payroll comes around.
You can work 24 hours a day and fail when market conditions turn against you. Awesome, isn't it?
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)or didn't have enough initial (start up) capital to get them through two full years without a profit. It's what I learned in business school 30 years ago, and it's as true today as it was then.
So, those are the facts. Have a nice day.
SBA says 50% fail during first year
In his book Small Business Management, Michael Ames gives the following reasons for small business failure:
1. Lack of experience
2. Insufficient capital (money)
3. Poor location
4. Poor inventory management
5. Over-investment in fixed assets
6. Poor credit arrangements
7. Personal use of business funds
8. Unexpected growth
Gustav Berle adds two more reasons in The Do It Yourself Business Book:
9. Competition
10. Low sales
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/smallbusiness/a/whybusfail.htm
savalez
(3,517 posts)SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)savalez
(3,517 posts)Not everyone is pinned to Cable TV news all day. Me, never. I had read about the part taken out of context but at the time could not find the full transcript. Anyway, here it is for anyone interested.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/13/remarks-president-campaign-event-roanoke-virginia
Bigmack
(8,020 posts)Iggy
(1,418 posts)yes, please go off to your swank maisons tucked away in heavily guarded, gated communities.. with
your infinity pools and garages with "car elevators". just please go now.
wait, what's that you say?
WHO will raise and cook your food? who will wipe your spoiled kids' asses? who will skim your infinity
pool? who will mow your lawn, tend your garden? who will take out your trash? who will service your
three Cadillacs? your Volvos? who will unclog your toilet?
your kids? Hah hah hah hahh!!! your kids don't do shit!
you see arseholes, you NEED us wayyyy more than we need you.
so please go far away, alllll by yourselves, and see how long you survive. have Fun!!
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)To wit: Individuals have "thoughts" communicated by language.
Wittgenstein: Humans evolved playing language-games. The expression of the thought IS the thought. In the deepest sense, we are social beings.
Deep water:
drokhole
(1,230 posts)...that go into building a business's infrastructure (tech gadgets, offices, warehouses, any and all other assets), and into the machines used to build that infrastructure, and the people who built those machines, or developed the mathematical concepts underlying the mechanics of those machines, or (to use your pizza example) developed those recipes, and those people's network of people who influenced and aided in their lives, etc., etc., etc...
"A hundred times every day I remind myself that my inner and outer life are based on the labors of other men, living and dead, and that I must exert myself in order to give in the same measure as I have received and am still receiving..." - Albert Einstein
"If I have seen farther it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." - Isaac Newton
And let's not forget the Earth and the complex network of macro- and micro-organisms that thanklessly provide people with the resources that they so often callously exploit in attaining and accumulating their "wealth" on "their own."
kemah
(276 posts)Right now the Midwest would be speaking French if was not for the Louisiana Purchase, the Lewis and Clark Expedition all paid with government money. Plus the Transcontinental Railroad paid with fed money. These projects plus countless more made this country.
Look at Hoover Dam government project, Las Vegas would not exist today with the low electric rates and the water from Lake Meade created by Hoover Dam.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)Zax2me
(2,515 posts)You know you are at odds with his comments, right?
President Obama meant roads and bridges, specifically.
When romney said he meant what you say - the Presidents campaign called him for deceit and changing the meaning of what he said.
Which is what romney did.
So, I guess, what are you defending?
Because we know it is not the Presidents comments as romney - and apparently you - see them.
kentuck
(111,076 posts)But even if he had said what they are saying he said, he would not have to run from the comments. They could be defended. Even their lies can be defeated. Because they are trying to say - no, they are actually saying it- that the President said that "no one built his business by himself", which he did not actually mean but the Repubs have intentionally misconstrued.
You are probably correct also that we should not fight on those grounds but on the grounds of what the President meant to say, however clumsily.
I still say that no one built a successful business without the help of someone else or the community as a whole.
Sometimes, it's just not enough to say "they are lying".
LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I bet they even drove over bridges on occasion.