Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 07:26 PM Jul 2012

Mitt Romney To Israeli Newspaper: Nuclear Iran ‘Greatest Threat To The World’

Mitt Romney To Israeli Newspaper: Nuclear Iran ‘Greatest Threat To The World’

In an interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz Thursday, Mitt Romney declared a nuclear-armed Iran to be the gravest foreign policy threat:

I have said in the past and I can reiterate now that it is essential that Iran does not become nuclear. A nuclear Iran represents the greatest threat to the world, to the United States and to the very existence of Israel. A nuclear Iran would mean that Hezbollah or other actors would potentially someday be able to secure fissile materials which would threaten the world.

Romney refrained several times from directly criticizing President Obama over Israeli policy and noted that both he and the president have “said that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable.” Iran is never far from Romney’s lips when talking about foreign policy, but in the past he’s referred to Russia as America’s ”No. 1 geopolitical foe.”

Romney criticized Russia in the Haaretz interview for standing in the way of U.N. resolutions that would aid the rebellion in Syria.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/mitt-romney-to-israeli-newspaper-nuclear-iran-greatest

Time to yank this idiot off the international stage.

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt Romney To Israeli Newspaper: Nuclear Iran ‘Greatest Threat To The World’ (Original Post) ProSense Jul 2012 OP
Sounds like he has a war planned. AsahinaKimi Jul 2012 #1
I'm sure he'd do it at a drop of the hat. sakabatou Jul 2012 #13
Also world's greatest threat: abortion, gun control, taxes. n/t dimbear Jul 2012 #2
And don't forget Turbineguy Jul 2012 #3
No mittwit, you and your mental exceptionalism are. part man all 86 Jul 2012 #4
it's romney's face and john bolton's words....this guy is dangerous spanone Jul 2012 #5
Ding, ding, ding.... We have a winner! Scuba Jul 2012 #26
How ego centric he is.... WCGreen Jul 2012 #6
Mitt, Korea and Pakistan HAVE nuclear weapons Rosa Luxemburg Jul 2012 #7
Hey Oliver North ... Romney's picking a fight with your gunrunning buds ... zbdent Jul 2012 #8
And here we go. Ishoutandscream2 Jul 2012 #9
The traditional bowing and scraping to Israel. randome Jul 2012 #10
Who was it that said that Iraq's WMDs were the greatest threat to the world? Oh, nevermind. nt nanabugg Jul 2012 #11
Okay, I'm going to get creamed for this but dballance Jul 2012 #12
Creamed by whom? Le Taz Hot Jul 2012 #17
Thanks dballance Jul 2012 #30
I refer to them as the "wolf pack" Le Taz Hot Jul 2012 #34
Romney to Haaretz: Military option on Iran should not be ruled out Tx4obama Jul 2012 #14
Romney and Nukes Betty Jo Jul 2012 #15
Obama and Clinton and many Dems say the same thing. nt Skip Intro Jul 2012 #16
Oh, now you've gone and done it. Le Taz Hot Jul 2012 #18
Shhhhh. Buzzkill. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2012 #19
"OhMyGinIsBad" - Skip Intro Jul 2012 #23
Are ProSense Jul 2012 #21
Gibberish. Look - Skip Intro Jul 2012 #22
Oh Bullshit. ProSense Jul 2012 #25
You're just wrong. Obama and Dems send the same message. Skip Intro Jul 2012 #33
Now, that's playing to the audience! Tom Ripley Jul 2012 #20
I wonder what will happen in the middle east in October. alp227 Jul 2012 #24
pander much mitt? spanone Jul 2012 #27
Same Iran Different Day... KharmaTrain Jul 2012 #28
Presumptive Presidential Nominee Turbineguy Jul 2012 #29
Obama said "I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon". nt jody Jul 2012 #31
Yeah, ProSense Jul 2012 #32

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)
6. How ego centric he is....
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 08:05 PM
Jul 2012

I certainly don't think the billions of people who are living on the edge really give two shits about a nuclear Iran.

I think a whole lot of people in South America and Australia could care less what Iran does or doesn't do.

Ishoutandscream2

(6,660 posts)
9. And here we go.
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 08:50 PM
Jul 2012

Looks like Mittens is going to be a neo-cons wet dream. This man does not need to be even close to the White House.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
12. Okay, I'm going to get creamed for this but
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 08:59 PM
Jul 2012

One could argue the the nuclear USA with over 5,000 nukes (as of 2010) and 150 military bases around the world (and that's only the ones the Pentagon will admit to) might be pretty dangerous to the world. We are the ones who illegally invaded Iraq, a country NOT involved in 9/11 and with no chemical or nuclear weapons. We inched our way in to Viet Nam incrementally under the guise of stopping global Communism. Why we thought it was our job to tell the rest of the world none of them could be communist and have communist governments even if the wanted just because we feared communism is because we're arrogant bullies - sort of like Rmoney.

We armed the Contras, we propped up the Shah of Iran, we propped up Hosni Mubarak, we turn a pretty blind eye to Israel's apartheid treatment of the Palestinians. And then there is our trade partner China (obviously we got over the communism issues. Cheap, sweatshop labor will do that for us). Unless you live in an urban center you live in squalor but we ignore that.

Let's not forget how our war on drugs has affected Central and South America. We've been the proximate cause of the reign of terror of the drug lords in Mexico. Scores of dead bodies turn up in the desert on a regular basis. Oh, and we're losing that war miserably.

The US seems to think it is justified in going anywhere in the world and do whatever it wants. If diplomacy doesn't work we supply rebels with guns and money to get our way covertly by overthrowing recalcitrant governments. And then there is the fact we have the largest military in the world capable of striking anywhere in the world within 24 hours. So sometimes we get our way overtly like with Iraq.

But of course it's always only because it's in the national interests of all the US citizens and spreading peace and democracy around the world.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
17. Creamed by whom?
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 01:31 AM
Jul 2012

Facts are facts and no person with two brain cells to rub together can argue with what you laid out.

Excellent!

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
30. Thanks
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 11:11 AM
Jul 2012

I've gotten some nasty comments and even an e-mail me to please die in the most horrific way possible when I've posted criticisms of the US and compared some of the US's activities like putting so much money into weapons systems while we ignore the homeless and the hungry to similar actions of countries like North Korea. Not opposing arguments with logical rebuttals mind you which would be fine. Just nasty name calling and wishes for my most painful and ultimate demise.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
34. I refer to them as the "wolf pack"
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 01:17 AM
Jul 2012

and they're just trying to silence you. The list of names I've been called on this board is long and illustrious, if unimaginative. They're also meaningless if you're confident in who you are. They resort to personal attacks because they can't logically defend their point of view. Keep telling the truth and if the wolf pack doesn't like it, they can always put you on ignore.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
14. Romney to Haaretz: Military option on Iran should not be ruled out
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 02:20 AM
Jul 2012

Front page headline...

Romney to Haaretz: Military option on Iran should not be ruled out

Here: http://www.haaretz.com/


 

Betty Jo

(66 posts)
15. Romney and Nukes
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 01:18 AM
Jul 2012

Romney and the Mormon church have a whole scenario about Israel and The Rapture.The Fundamentalists are engrossed with Israel for the same reason.Go google it and see why Romney and other religous war mongers should never have the Nuke controls.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
19. Shhhhh. Buzzkill.
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 01:39 AM
Jul 2012
Everyone knows a nuclear Iran is no threat whatsoever. Everyone with a brain that is. Hezbollah wants peace, and OhMyGinIsBad never said Israel should be wiped off the map. If he did, he simply misspoke. Everyone misspeaks on occasion.

Nuclear Iran? No problem!

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
21. Are
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 01:48 AM
Jul 2012

"Obama and Clinton and many Dems say the same thing."

...Obama advisors running ads advocating war with Iran?

Romney says stuff like this:

I can tell you that I think President Bush took action which he believed, based upon the information that was available to him, both from British intelligence and intelligence in our country and around the world, that Saddam Hussein presented a very serious threat to the world, including the potential of weapons of mass destruction. And he took action which he believed was necessary to protect our people and our friends.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/27/1114456/-Romney-on-Pierce-Morgan-Tonight-Transcript


Look over there>>>>bullshit false equivalency.

Sucks to be anti-Obama doesn't it?

Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
22. Gibberish. Look -
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 02:13 AM
Jul 2012

We all know - you and I know - that many, many Dems have spoken about how the US simply cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Obama and Clinton have both echoed that sentiment, joining many repubs. Now Romney is added to that list. There is no incantation you can utter that will change the fact that for a while now both Dems and repubs routinely stop just short of threatening war against Iran. Dems and repubs.

I won't knowingly be a hypocrite and pretend I don't know Dems are right there in the mix.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
25. Oh Bullshit.
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 08:44 AM
Jul 2012
We all know - you and I know - that many, many Dems have spoken about how the US simply cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Obama and Clinton have both echoed that sentiment, joining many repubs. Now Romney is added to that list. There is no incantation you can utter that will change the fact that for a while now both Dems and repubs routinely stop just short of threatening war against Iran. Dems and repubs.


Romney's comment is dangerous sabre rattling. The President and Democrats don't go to Israel and make statements to inflame the situation. Romney's statements are never simply that "the US simply cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon."

Most important, I will buttress my diplomacy with a military option that will persuade the ayatollahs to abandon their nuclear ambitions. Only when they understand that at the end of that road lies not nuclear weapons but ruin will there be a real chance for a peaceful resolution.

<...>

We can’t afford to wait much longer, and we certainly can’t afford to wait through four more years of an Obama administration. By then it will be far too late. If the Iranians are permitted to get the bomb, the consequences will be as uncontrollable as they are horrendous. My foreign policy plan to avert this catastrophe is plain: Either the ayatollahs will get the message, or they will learn some very painful lessons about the meaning of American resolve.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mitt-romney-how-i-would-check-irans-nuclear-ambition/2012/03/05/gIQAneYItR_print.html


Kerry: Romney’s wrong-headed assertions about Iran
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/romneys-wrong-headed-assertions-about-iran/2012/03/07/gIQAcKCvxR_story.html

Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
33. You're just wrong. Obama and Dems send the same message.
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 11:41 PM
Jul 2012

Obama strongly says military option is on the table as far as Iran goes. Many Dems slam Iran and express the view that the US will not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons. Pretending that those things aren't true doesn't make them any less true.

Don't delude yourself.

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
28. Same Iran Different Day...
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 09:15 AM
Jul 2012

IRC, the U.S. was all but certain to invade, bomb, nuke and otherwise be nasty all over Iran several years ago. I remember those who were certain that Crashcart would engineer one more great war for profit that never materialized. There was a big reason for that happening...or not happening. Despite Chenney's wet dreams the U.S. military was spent...and still is. It couldn't afford to launch a third war in the region and it's doubtful that the military's outlook has changed.

A nuclear Iran would complicate matters in the region...and there's precious little this country can do...no matter how many sabres Willard and Walrus Bolton rattle. The game here is to play up to the fundies and Likudniks (like Sheldon Adelson) for a cash shakedown for Mitten's campaign and hope to keep that wing of his corrupt and fragmented party intact. This trip shows that Willard is uncomfortable in his own skin...

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
32. Yeah,
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 11:42 AM
Jul 2012

"Obama said 'I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon'. "

...it's called diplomacy.

Romney's policy (joke) is threatening war.

Most important, I will buttress my diplomacy with a military option that will persuade the ayatollahs to abandon their nuclear ambitions. Only when they understand that at the end of that road lies not nuclear weapons but ruin will there be a real chance for a peaceful resolution.

<...>

We can’t afford to wait much longer, and we certainly can’t afford to wait through four more years of an Obama administration. By then it will be far too late. If the Iranians are permitted to get the bomb, the consequences will be as uncontrollable as they are horrendous. My foreign policy plan to avert this catastrophe is plain: Either the ayatollahs will get the message, or they will learn some very painful lessons about the meaning of American resolve.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mitt-romney-how-i-would-check-irans-nuclear-ambition/2012/03/05/gIQAneYItR_print.html


Romney: Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran
http://www.thenation.com/blog/168478/romney-bomb-bomb-bomb-bomb-bomb-iran

Have you seen the ads from his advisers advocating war?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitt Romney To Israeli Ne...