Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 04:15 AM Jul 2012

Maria Bartiromo And Barney Frank Were Just At Each Other's Throats For A Solid Ten Minutes

Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) was just a guest on CNBC's Closing Bell with Maria Bartiromo, and quite frankly, the interview went from zero to ugly in less than two minutes.

Maria started off by asking Barney about the topic du jour, Sandy Weill's complete reversal on the concept of a the 'supermarket' mega bank.

Barney responded saying that it was not a useful time to be talking about this because "you can accomplish much of what he's talking about with the Volcker Rule..."

To which Maria replied, after much rambling from Barney, that "the problem with the Volcker Rule is that you can't define it."

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/maria-bartiromo-and-barney-frank-cnbc-interview-2012-7#ixzz21oCh62K0

Scroll down for video.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maria Bartiromo And Barney Frank Were Just At Each Other's Throats For A Solid Ten Minutes (Original Post) dipsydoodle Jul 2012 OP
I love Barney Frank. UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 #1
And there was a link at that page to Meredith Whitney yesterday: Bolo Boffin Jul 2012 #2
That was fun. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #3
Citibank Bartiromo, the afternoon version of her fellow right-wing-ding Joey Kernen . . . HughBeaumont Jul 2012 #4
I agree with Maria.. sendero Jul 2012 #5
i forget, of gramm, leach, and bliley, which one was barney frank? unblock Jul 2012 #6
Did he push ... sendero Jul 2012 #8
like i said, glass-stegall had largely been gutted by then. unblock Jul 2012 #10
CNBC is not even marginally news network alcibiades_mystery Jul 2012 #7
She went round and round with Eliot Spitzer a couple weeks ago. moondust Jul 2012 #9

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
2. And there was a link at that page to Meredith Whitney yesterday:
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:23 AM
Jul 2012

To the mega-banks: ""You're either making money or you're not. If you're not making money get out of the business."

http://www.businessinsider.com/meredith-whitney-on-breaking-up-wall-street-banks-2012-7#ixzz21oTQ1Q6T

She says the government doesn't need to step in, though. The Street itself will take the hacksaws to the big banks. We'll see.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
4. Citibank Bartiromo, the afternoon version of her fellow right-wing-ding Joey Kernen . . .
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:41 AM
Jul 2012

Repubilcans have a friend in CNBC. Watch it some time . . . Republicans are allowed free reign to just yap and yap and yap away.

Paul Krugman? Serially interrupted by the wingnut anchors. Barney Frank, the uneducated conservative's favorite punching bag, for some mysterious reason OTHER than the fact he's gay? Serially interrupted. Any Democrat to the left of Joe Lieberturd? Serially interrupted. It's no wonder we have this 24-hour anti-Obama, anti-Democrat, anti-progress ad on mute.

We just want tickers and finance news. We don't care about your obvious spread of the right wing gospel, Maria. Go to Faux business like so many of your colleagues did.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
5. I agree with Maria..
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 05:45 AM
Jul 2012

... Dodd Frank is a crazy quilt joke of a piece of legislation. Glass Stegall worked for 50 years and it would work now, and the only reason we don't have it is the banks don't want it and they own Barney and the country.

unblock

(52,183 posts)
6. i forget, of gramm, leach, and bliley, which one was barney frank?
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:47 AM
Jul 2012

dodd frank is actually the most insightful and judicious piece of legislation i've seen in a long, long time. it's amazing it got through this mess of a congess. sure, it doesn't do enough, but it was clearly written by people who understand the modern complexities of banking and want to actually, properly regulate it.

glass-stegall was largely gutted over the years by deregulatory efforts made by many people in washington. greenspan likely deserves the most blame. THAT had become a joke piece of legislation by the time it was fully repealed, as gramm-leach-bliley and subsequent fed deregulation had permitted wide affilition across what used to be a wall between banking and investment activity.

should we bring back glass-stegall in it's former full glory? absolutely.

but there were many causes of the crisis, and barney frank's role in it was minor.


he's not perfect, but he's definitely one of the good guys.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
8. Did he push ...
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:54 AM
Jul 2012

... for a return of Glass Stegall?

I don't think so.

The bottom line is simple. If you had G-S you could throw away Dodd Frank and every other bit of crazy quilt legislation designed to make the banks act right. As long as bankers can gamble with govt backed money they will find a way, period.

unblock

(52,183 posts)
10. like i said, glass-stegall had largely been gutted by then.
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:30 AM
Jul 2012

bring back glass-stegall and you still would have had banks earning significant money from affiliated investment banks and from "non-banking" activities.

glass-stegall needs to be brought back with the strength and implemented regulations in force in the '70s. it had been gradually weakened ever since then.

like i said, barney frank is not perfect, but he's one of the good guys and he's also a realist. he understands the makeup of congress and has a keen insight into what's acheivable and what's not. there are and have been way too many anti-regulation economic anarchists in congress, including but sadly not limited to pretty much all the republicans.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
7. CNBC is not even marginally news network
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:51 AM
Jul 2012

It is a corporate propaganda station, pretty much non-stop. They have to have it on all day in brokerages and other similar outfits (and, coming from Chicago, I mean the word "Outfit" according to its Chicago connotations) not because it provides anything like useful information, but because the workers in such places must be endlessly indoctrinated with the dictums of finance capital lest they look down at what they're doing and resign in disgust.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
9. She went round and round with Eliot Spitzer a couple weeks ago.
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:11 AM
Jul 2012

Presumably chalking up bonus points with her overlords.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maria Bartiromo And Barne...