Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomSlick

(11,096 posts)
Tue Feb 27, 2018, 08:53 PM Feb 2018

On security clearances.

Both a Secret and Top Secret security clearance require a background investigation. The background investigation for a Top Secret clearance is more in-depth than a Secret clearance. My expectation would be that if someone with a Secret clearance failed the more in-depth investigation for a Top Secret clearance, not only would the Top Secret clearance not be granted, the Secret clearance would be revoked.

Jared, being a novice to government service, Jared did not have a Secret clearance when the more in-depth Top Secret clearance was conducted. Because Jared could not pass a background check for a Top Secret clearance, my expectation would be that he also would not get a Secret clearance.

My understanding is that Jared has not received a Secret clearance but is simply being given access to Secret material without the clearance. While I appreciate that the President can give access to any classified material to anyone he wants, what is really being done is that the President is giving a person who could not pass a background check access to Secret material. IMHO, such a blatant disregard for the security of the U.S. to benefit a family member, while not criminal, is an impeachable abuse of power.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On security clearances. (Original Post) TomSlick Feb 2018 OP
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Feb 2018 #1
Yes! Here is a hammer post. Thank you OP. poboy2 Feb 2018 #2
What's been missed is that Rosenstein said they are aware of ongoing reasons NightWatcher Feb 2018 #3
That's my suspicion. TomSlick Feb 2018 #4
Ted Lieu on Chris Hayes now... poboy2 Feb 2018 #5
I know this is tired, nevertheless, TomSlick Feb 2018 #6
 

poboy2

(2,078 posts)
2. Yes! Here is a hammer post. Thank you OP.
Tue Feb 27, 2018, 08:57 PM
Feb 2018

HAMMER

The WH needs to keep being HAMMERED on this.

ALL those w/failed or provisional clearance MUST GO NOW.

THERE IS NO WORKAROUND.


GO

NOW


National Security is at stake.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
3. What's been missed is that Rosenstein said they are aware of ongoing reasons
Tue Feb 27, 2018, 08:58 PM
Feb 2018

why Jar Jar cannot get a clearance. Not only did he DO things in the past but he is currently DOING things that preclude him from getting a clearance.

Rosenstein must know that Jar Jar is going to be indicted soon.

TomSlick

(11,096 posts)
4. That's my suspicion.
Tue Feb 27, 2018, 09:17 PM
Feb 2018

Mueller is following a classic prosecutorial strategy - a move from the periphery to the center. If you trace the concentric circles, Jared ought to coming soon.

 

poboy2

(2,078 posts)
5. Ted Lieu on Chris Hayes now...
Tue Feb 27, 2018, 09:23 PM
Feb 2018

He is HAMMER TIME on this.

Calling ALL non-cleared staff to resign.

THAT is what needs a chorus.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On security clearances.