General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSize of the balls Morning Edition is sucking this morning . . . ostrich egg? Cantaloupe?
Last edited Tue Mar 6, 2018, 10:03 AM - Edit history (1)
So I'm out cleaning the kitchen, putting away dishes, doing some cooking bright and early, and listening to the news.
It's NPR, live from DC and Dallas, since the first primary of this cycle starts today in Texas. And what's on tap today?
Well, let's see, first of all it's the congressman from upstate New York, a Republican, of course, talking all about how he's in favor of Shitstain's shiny new trade war.
Next up - ripped from the political headlines of the Lone Star state - a Latino politician from the Rio Grande - but one with a difference! You see, he's a hyper-conservative supporter of El Pendejo Gordo, a Tea Party fuckstick through and through, and he loves The Wall blahblahblahblah.
Next up - Trade War 2 - Electric Boogaloo! It's the owner of an aluminum company in western Kentucky, and he's really prepped for his interview by dusting off Wilbur (Uncle Sleepy) Ross' Parable of the Beer Can for all us uninformed urban elites.
Top of the hour - and coming up next! Two Texas voters! One's a rock-ribbed Republican, and the other's a Democrat . . . well, he used to be a Democrat. But you know, he didn't leave the party, it left him. And now he's come around to support President Caligula, because reasons.
Click.
dhol82
(9,352 posts)Did they not have any democrats on for sane comments?
hatrack
(59,583 posts)Sam who?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)There is very little PUBLIC about it any more.
marybourg
(12,620 posts)they had a publican woman having second thoughts about her party
hatrack
(59,583 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)Merlot
(9,696 posts)I give it a listen while driving and have found the national news always plays quotes of repubs first and longer, then will either briefly sumarize the dem side, or play a shorter clip.
When someone tells me they listen to NPR, I don't assume they are liberal. I've had a couple people tell me that and I think...then you're really not listening closely.
Big Blue Marble
(5,067 posts)There are lots of good ones: more than I have time for.
Start with Pod Save America and Lovett Or Leave It.
You will feeel much better.
J_William_Ryan
(1,753 posts)has for years been hypersensitive to being accused of being "leftist."
Back in the Reagan years rightwing nitwits referred to NPR as "Radio Moscow. "
So they make sure the reprehensible right gets its equal time.
There is also merit to the idea that allowing the right to exhibit its ignorance, hate, and stupidity benefits Democrats.
marybourg
(12,620 posts)I support balance in news. When I want an echo chamber, I come here. But, sometimes their deference to publican guests, contrasted with their bullying of dem guests, irks
Nitram
(22,791 posts)conservatives and liberals express their opinions within the larger context NPR always provides is not propaganda. It is good reporting.
QC
(26,371 posts)That's been the case since the GOP started threatening their funding.
barbtries
(28,787 posts)national public republican radio.
who owns them now i wonder. i generally have to put in my CD when politics comes up in the car.
a kennedy
(29,647 posts)listening to them at all now. The national talking heads are just sickening, so, no more NPR for me. Ugh.....
world wide wally
(21,740 posts)Beats the hell out of Fox Lite
spike91nz
(180 posts)Their brand for the loyal listeners so they can privatize it without protest or resistance. Theil strategy style I suspect. They have been talking about cutting it lose for a while.
dae
(3,396 posts)infullview
(981 posts)... and I'm sure it comes with strings. While we're at it, let's talk about Front Line - another supposedly liberal Bastian. I watched an episode of Front Line which covered power line cancer clusters. Not once did they cover the carcinogenic defoliants used to keep the growth of trees and scrubs in check. Not once did they analyze high voltage ionization of the air and air quality around high tension wires. They focused on EMF (electro motive force) which is probably not the cause of cancer. Guess who funded the show and the research? Yep. GE power systems. Talk about your misdirection. I was so mad I sent email to the producer haven't watched the show since.
lark
(23,091 posts)NPR is now a repug bastion and I don't ever listen to them anymore.
CatWoman
(79,295 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)central scrutinizer
(11,648 posts)Been craven lap dogs for many years
dhol82
(9,352 posts)The six minutes of news at the top of he hour never seemed obviously slanted rightward.
Used to listen on my drive to and from work. Loved most of the programming.
Brian Lehrer always seemed pretty liberal.
Still remember way back when some conservative railed against it as being totally biased left. I thought he was strange.
ffr
(22,669 posts)In one respect, you have to admire how simple their plan is, to keep spewing out their talking point propaganda. It's working. At least on those too simple minded to see through the BS.
Nitram
(22,791 posts)Quite the contrary. A larger percentage of their funding than ever before is coming from the public. State and federal funding has dropped significantly. FFR, could you provide a link demonstrating that "conservative money has taken over public broadcasting?"
Nitram
(22,791 posts)NPR this morning. The aluminum/steel trade war Republican was asked a number of very good, relevant and hard-hitting questions, such as, "Congressman, are you saying this threat to have a trade war is just a ploy?" There is an important primary coming up in Texas, and I was fine with hearing NPR's reporting about both the Democratic surge there and what ultra-right wing, anti-immigration Publicans are saying. It sounds almost like hatrack wants a liberal version of Fox News.UI have the intelligence and knowledge to listen to Publican's opinions and stands without being swayed. On the contrary, I like to know what we're up against, and how nutty a lot of what they believe actually is.
hatrack
(59,583 posts)What I'm tired of is the same old NPR formula:
"President Trump today announced that he's imposing tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum, so we're going to interview a Republican politician on the topic."
"Texas may shape up as a pivotal state in this year's mid-term election, so we're going to interview a Tea Party Republican politician on the topic."
"America's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Treaty could have substantial long-term impacts on global efforts to control rapid climate change, so we're going to interview some guy from the Competitive Enterprise Institute on the topic."
"Gun control law is emerging as a potentially major issue in the mid-terms, so we're going to Florida to interview a group of heavily armed right-wing militia members as they snort meth and hold each others' nuts."
Maybe DW, AFP and the Guardian have spoiled me, and if I want to see people bend over backwards in search of "balance", I'll wait until the Chinese Acrobatic Theater is in town.
aggiesal
(8,911 posts)cilla4progress
(24,726 posts)v. trump admin. Some are more obvious than others.
Scruffy1
(3,255 posts)Most of their funding comes from corporate sponsors. What do you expect?