Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
Wed Mar 7, 2018, 10:19 PM Mar 2018

So hubby said, "Why don't you iron the sheets?"

Important - Hubby does the laundry and we almost never iron anything, but I have a basket of sheets that I've decided to give to Goodwill and want them sort of ironed.

He suggested this because he wanted me to watch an hour long talk by David Brooks. I don't like listening to stuff that long. He really wanted me to. So I did. I'm glad I did. If there are any DUers who can handle an hour long talk, I'd love to hear your reaction.

&t=46s
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So hubby said, "Why don't you iron the sheets?" (Original Post) LAS14 Mar 2018 OP
Ok, I have bookmarked. dhol82 Mar 2018 #1
I'll just leave this here: Fuck David Brooks. twice. TeamPooka Mar 2018 #2
Who is Brooks and why the FU? dixiegrrrrl Mar 2018 #6
Start here....myriad more examples of his jagoffness Gabi Hayes Mar 2018 #7
That'll work. fuck him. dixiegrrrrl Mar 2018 #11
He is, after all, the conservative commentator on the newshour, and that comment was... LAS14 Mar 2018 #12
Whitewater was more substantive? Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2018 #14
neocon war monger too Exotica Mar 2018 #8
He is a huge Republican idiot. TeamPooka Mar 2018 #10
Lol nope. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 2018 #3
Ay ...... frickin men. He and Mr. Friedman Unit ought to have a preening contest..... Gabi Hayes Mar 2018 #5
Loved it. Ms. Toad Mar 2018 #4
Why would I listen to that shithead for 10 minutes blake2012 Mar 2018 #9
See my reply #12. LAS14 Mar 2018 #13
 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
7. Start here....myriad more examples of his jagoffness
Thu Mar 8, 2018, 12:46 AM
Mar 2018
I was the op-ed editor at The Wall Street Journal at the peak of the Whitewater scandal. We ran a series of investigative pieces “raising serious questions” (as we say in the scandal business) about the nefarious things the Clintons were thought to have done back in Arkansas.

Now I confess I couldn’t follow all the actual allegations made in those essays. They were six jungles deep in the weeds. But I do remember the intense atmosphere that the scandal created. A series of bombshell revelations came out in the media, which seemed monumental at the time. A special prosecutor was appointed and indictments were expected. Speculation became the national sport.

In retrospect Whitewater seems overblown. And yet it has to be confessed that, at least so far, the Whitewater scandal was far more substantive than the Russia-collusion scandal now gripping Washington.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/20/opinion/russia-investigation-trump.html

Absolutely read some of the comments. They reveal just how much of a fool (tool?) Brooks truly is

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
12. He is, after all, the conservative commentator on the newshour, and that comment was...
Thu Mar 8, 2018, 12:14 PM
Mar 2018

... back in June. I wouldn't recommend his conservative views. But see if you think this talk at Davidson was to be rejected on its merits.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,407 posts)
14. Whitewater was more substantive?
Thu Mar 8, 2018, 12:20 PM
Mar 2018

How many people actually went to jail over it? The only thing that the 5,6, 7(?) year long investigation of Whitewater by 2-3(?) people produced was the impeachment of President Clinton, albeit over a TOTALLY UNRELATED MATTER. The Trump/Russia investigation has already produced several indictments, plea agreements, likely with more to come.

 

Exotica

(1,461 posts)
8. neocon war monger too
Thu Mar 8, 2018, 01:13 AM
Mar 2018
Before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Brooks argued forcefully for American military intervention, echoing the belief of commentators and political figures that American and British forces would be welcomed as liberators. In 2005, Brooks wrote what columnist Jonathan Chait described as "a witheringly condescending" column portraying Senator Harry Reid as an "unhinged conspiracy theorist because he accused the [George W. Bush] administration of falsifying its Iraq intelligence.


The Certainty Crisis
From the March 7, 2003 London Times: George W. Bush's waffle-free directness alarms the fashionably doubtful commentariat.
11:00 PM, MAR 09, 2003 | By DAVID BROOKS

http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/3604


The Collapse of the Dream Palaces
From the April 28, 2003 issue: Mass destruction of mistaken ideas.
12:00 AM, APR 28, 2003 | By DAVID BROOKS

http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/3820



The Harry da Reid Code
By DAVID BROOKS
Published: November 3, 2005

https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C03E5D8163EF930A35752C1A9639C8B63



you will vomit reading that shit
 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
5. Ay ...... frickin men. He and Mr. Friedman Unit ought to have a preening contest.....
Wed Mar 7, 2018, 11:30 PM
Mar 2018

See whose arm reaches farther behind his own back, gaining the most leverage for self pattage

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=friedman%20unit

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So hubby said, "Why don't...