General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Kobach Voting Rights Trial: Live Updates
-snip- (info about the updates and who is doing them)
3/9, 9:46 a.m. CT Kansas admits different voters get different information: Becca Waldmen, an attorney for the ACLU challengers, has been pressing Kobachs elections director, Bryan Caskey, on how voters who have registered to vote via the preliminary injunction that was imposed on the law have been treated by his office, versus those who were registered after showing proof of citizenship. Caskey tried to dodge her question at first, until the judge had to intervene to urge him to answer the question whether the two groups of voters receive different information about voting from the SoS office directly.
It is not the same information, Caskey admitted.
3/9, 9:26 a.m. CT Judge still explaining procedure to Kobach team: Tempers were a little cooler as we started trial Friday, but were still beginning with a procedural hiccup. Kansas attorney Garrett Roe sought to present pieces of the challenged laws legislative history. He couldnt at first explain whether he wanted the court to take judicial notice a term for non-disputed facts that are typically in the public domain or submit it as evidence.
Link to tweet
The judge said she wouldnt submit it as evidence, and she wont take judicial notice until the opposing counsel had a chance to look at the legislative history documents.
more (yesterday's live updates):
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/kobach-voting-rights-trial/live-updates
Gothmog
(144,945 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I'd be willing to bet they have their Motion for Directed Verdict all teed up and ready for Judge Robinson's favorably-disposed consideration.
I mean, how fucking dumb do you have to be to get lectured multiple times by the judge about getting things into evidence?