Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy The Bush Tax Cut Vote Was So Important (TPM)
Last edited Sat Jul 28, 2012, 06:04 AM - Edit history (1)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/07/why_the_tax_vote_matters.php?ref=fpblg<snip>
In hindsight, an inability or unwillingness to phase out the Bush tax cuts for high earners before the 2010 election was the Democrats single largest failure of President Obamas first two years. That single omission underlies so many of the difficulties hes faced in the ensuing year and a half that its difficult to fathom how different the political landscape would look today if Dems had handled things differently in 2009 or 2010.
But they didnt do it in the brief period when they had 60 votes. They didnt do it via the budget process, which wouldve required rounding up only 50 votes, and they were so scared of every GOP utterance by the fall of 2010 that they didnt even effectively turn GOP hostage-taking into an effective political weapon. Senate Democrats fractured over whether to set the expiration threshold at $250,000 or $1 million, and even at that higher bar they werent able to unite in a way that clarified the Republicans politically noxious legislative strategy. House Democrats were in even greater disarray. It was a mess.
<snip>
I think thats almost entirely attributable to a commitment to purpose among Democratic leaders that just wasnt there two years ago. The White House deserves a lot of credit for that for stepping up a month ago and yanking Congressional Dems out of the politically palatable but substantively lazy consensus that they should draw the expiration line at $1 million. Once that was done, Harry Reid and other Dem leaders made clear, both publicly and privately, that politics and leverage were on the Democrats side in this fight, and that political consequences of rebuffing the President would be devastating.
Toward that end, Harry Reid stared down Mitch McConnell in a way he just didnt try in 2010. McConnell voluntarily dropped a filibuster, ostensibly to prevent Democrats from dragging the fight out for months and months, and identifying Senate Republicans as the key antagonists. He hung that anvil around John Boehners neck instead.
....more
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1145 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why The Bush Tax Cut Vote Was So Important (TPM) (Original Post)
kentuck
Jul 2012
OP
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)1. kr.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)2. 2009 is not 2012
I agree with some things said here, but I would have voted one way in 2009 and the other way in 2012 for purely macroeconomic reasons having nothing to do with backbone or strategy or "commitment to purpose"