Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Atticus

(15,124 posts) Tue Mar 13, 2018, 07:14 PM Mar 2018

Trump says he and Pompeo are "always on the same wavelength". Does anyone need to

know any more?

I have already contacted my Senators: "Please OPPOSE!"

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump says he and Pompeo are "always on the same wavelength". Does anyone need to (Original Post) Atticus Mar 2018 OP

That's not a good sign. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2018 #1

Precisely! 45 has more position shifts than the Kama Sutra. VOX Mar 2018 #2

Yes, we should ask MurrayDelph Mar 2018 #3

The frequency is MuseRider Mar 2018 #4

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)

1. That's not a good sign.

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Tue Mar 13, 2018, 07:20 PM

Mar 2018

But at some point Pompeo is bound to disagree with Trump, if for no other reason that Trump changes his mind all the time without warning anybody - so inevitably, everyone who thinks they're on the same wavelength turn out not to be.

VOX

(22,976 posts)

2. Precisely! 45 has more position shifts than the Kama Sutra.

Reply to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 13, 2018, 07:33 PM

Mar 2018

What he says on any given morning changes 180 degrees by nightfall, or sooner. Can there even be any sort of "wavelength"? It certainly doesn't appear so...just degrees of chaos.

MurrayDelph

(5,293 posts)

3. Yes, we should ask

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Tue Mar 13, 2018, 07:36 PM

Mar 2018

"What's the Frequency, Kenneth?"

MuseRider

(34,105 posts)

4. The frequency is

Reply to MurrayDelph (Reply #3)

Tue Mar 13, 2018, 07:58 PM

Mar 2018

KOCH industries.

Reply to this discussion