Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orangecrush

(19,411 posts)
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 05:45 PM Mar 2018

Can Facebook be trusted with your personal info? Voter harvesting scheme shows perils for users


SAN FRANCISCO — Can Facebook be trusted with your personal information?


That's the question many Americans are asking as Facebook scrambles to contain a growing firestorm over revelations that a data-mining firm working for the Trump campaign improperly got its hands on the personal information of tens of millions of people and created remarkably detailed and intimate profiles that were used to target unsuspecting voters in the presidential election.

For many, the incident raises troubling new questions about how Facebook manages third-party access to the sensitive information of its 2 billion users, including what safeguards the social media giant has in place to prevent third parties from sharing information with others and whether it has any way of knowing when that information is shared more broadly than intended.

Facebook says a researcher, Cambridge University's Aleksandr Kogan, gained access to the data of 270,000 Facebook users in 2013 through a personality quiz app that required Facebook users to grant access to their personal information including friends and "likes."

According to Facebook, he then gave that information to Cambridge Analytica, the firm that claimed it helped President Trump win the 2016 election. Facebook says that was a violation of its rules and, on Friday, it suspended Cambridge Analytica. On Monday it announced that Cambridge Analytica had agreed to an independent audit by a digital forensics firm.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/438464002


The word is getting out to America in plain language.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can Facebook be trusted with your personal info? Voter harvesting scheme shows perils for users (Original Post) orangecrush Mar 2018 OP
Which is why . . . gratuitous Mar 2018 #1
Wonkette has a truly wonderful article... orangecrush Mar 2018 #4
No way man!!!!! Wellstone ruled Mar 2018 #2
Answer these 12 questions orangecrush Mar 2018 #5
Nice Segway. Wellstone ruled Mar 2018 #7
Completely agree. I wonder are these 50 million a slight diversion ? From what i can see OnDoutside Mar 2018 #10
Not a techie,had to ask a techie Wellstone ruled Mar 2018 #16
I work in software and most companies would copy over an entire live environment or a slice of OnDoutside Mar 2018 #17
So true. Wellstone ruled Mar 2018 #18
NO. democratisphere Mar 2018 #3
Truth orangecrush Mar 2018 #6
Hey, I gave up on FB a decade ago. I was cool before it was cool to hate FB! ProudLib72 Mar 2018 #8
Good for you! orangecrush Mar 2018 #9
It will be interesting to see how this alters people's interaction with social media ProudLib72 Mar 2018 #11
agree 100% orangecrush Mar 2018 #12
Certainly we need a department of data protection, but we won't get it under the GOP ProudLib72 Mar 2018 #13
I was in electronics school orangecrush Mar 2018 #14
I missed the first, text based browsers. ProudLib72 Mar 2018 #15

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
1. Which is why . . .
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 05:47 PM
Mar 2018

Every time Facebook urges me to fill in more personal information (cell phone number, address), I chuckle wryly and close the little box.

OnDoutside

(19,948 posts)
10. Completely agree. I wonder are these 50 million a slight diversion ? From what i can see
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 06:21 PM
Mar 2018

Yes CA got 50 million account data sets, BUT that was to get to highly reliable algorithms, which were then used in Parcells data mining operation in Arizona, where they had embedded Facebook staff !!!

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/10/18/trump-chatter-breaking-all-records-facebook/92363936/

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
16. Not a techie,had to ask a techie
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 06:57 PM
Mar 2018

about this . Wow,he takes his Cell and away we go around the Shopping Mall,holy cow,the Info he was acquiring with a App he downloaded from a Web site. Unfriggin believable .


So what CA is doing is just the tip. Believe there was couple of these sites you mentioned. One in Texas and one in the Upper Midwest.

Well planned and financed for the look of things.

OnDoutside

(19,948 posts)
17. I work in software and most companies would copy over an entire live environment or a slice of
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 07:08 PM
Mar 2018

a live environment (depending on how sensitive the data is), for development/testing, onto another box. It's dead easy to copy entire websites etc.

Mercer's divesting himself of non finance related stuff can be seen in a different light now.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
8. Hey, I gave up on FB a decade ago. I was cool before it was cool to hate FB!
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 06:10 PM
Mar 2018

It's not that Fuckerberg doesn't care. In fact, he does care a lot... about himself. I put him in the same league as Shkreli.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
11. It will be interesting to see how this alters people's interaction with social media
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 06:21 PM
Mar 2018

If it does at all, I hope that we become a little more wary when posting all of our information for all to see and use. This is something that should become part of a high school curriculum: Social Media 101.

orangecrush

(19,411 posts)
12. agree 100%
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 06:27 PM
Mar 2018

Just read that Brits have a department of data protection.

Creating one here should be a priority for the coming democratic congress.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
13. Certainly we need a department of data protection, but we won't get it under the GOP
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 06:37 PM
Mar 2018

The first line of defense must be the end user -- us. It is ironic that people who grew up fully immersed in the internet are the ones who are usually the most vulnerable. Or maybe it's just that I'm GenX that makes me so distrusting.

orangecrush

(19,411 posts)
14. I was in electronics school
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 06:43 PM
Mar 2018

in 1997.

We had the web before the public library.

I remember it taking overnight to download an image.


ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
15. I missed the first, text based browsers.
Mon Mar 19, 2018, 06:55 PM
Mar 2018

I went straight to early Windows. My wife, on the other hand, has fond memories of life before a GUI.

I remember in grad school I had an older lap top (might as well have been a desk top it was so huge). I wanted to get internet access, so I ordered it (probably AOL or something similar I got in the mail). For some reason it wouldn't work after I installed it, so I had to call the help line. We went through a long process of testing before he asked me how much RAM my machine had. I told him I had 8 megs, and there was the problem! I needed at least 16. I opted for a new computer over upgrading my RAM.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can Facebook be trusted w...