Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Julian Englis

(2,309 posts)
Tue Mar 20, 2018, 12:31 AM Mar 2018

Politico: Angry Democrats pose rising risk for Facebook

Politico reports the obvious: Angry Democrats pose rising risk for Facebook

The latest revelations about Facebook’s conduct during the 2016 presidential campaign are angering a crucial group of the social media giant’s onetime allies — the Democrats who hope to regain control of Capitol Hill in November.

Democratic ire at the company has grown in the wake of President Donald Trump’s victory, amid a steady drip of disclosures about the way Russian operatives had exploited Facebook’s platform to aim politically themed ads, posts and so-called fake news at U.S. voters. But the acrimony is reaching new heights following this weekend’s news reports revealing that Facebook had allowed the Trump campaign’s data consulting firm, Cambridge Analytica, to obtain information on more than 50 million Americans.

All that suggests that Congress could be poised to crack down on Facebook if Democrats achieve the giant “blue wave” victory they’re hoping for in the midterm elections, and with it the gavels of key committees. The changing Democratic attitudes could augur a long-term shift in the social network's political prospects in Washington.

Consumer and privacy groups have pleaded for years for checks on massive data-collecting companies like Google, largely in vain. But Facebook is clearly in the Democrats’ sights now.

“The entire platform has gotten away from them, and they mishandle every problem that comes their way,” Philippe Reines, a longtime adviser to Hillary Clinton, told POLITICO on Monday. Reines and others with the Clinton campaign said anger and confusion over Facebook’s role in the election is widespread among Democratic campaign veterans, all the way up to the former nominee herself.

Democrats for years celebrated Facebook as a demonstration of the power of a connected world driven by liberal values. In the Obama era, Democrats and Facebook reveled in each other's reflected glory. It hasn't hurt that people associated with the company have been ready donors to Democrats.

But in a sign of how complete the Democratic metamorphosis is, Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, normally an enthusiastic advocate for the U.S. tech industry, wrote to Facebook CEO and founder Mark Zuckerberg on Monday to demand answers on the latest reports of data leakage.

"I have serious concerns about the role @Facebook played in facilitating and permitting the covert collection and misuse of consumer information by Cambridge Analytica," Wyden tweeted.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Response to Julian Englis (Original post)

sandensea

(21,624 posts)
2. Given that many of our Rethug friends have quit Facebook due to Zuckerberg's perceived pro-Dem views
Tue Mar 20, 2018, 12:35 AM
Mar 2018

Just who do they think they'll have left after all this!

regnaD kciN

(26,044 posts)
3. "All that suggests that Congress could be poised to crack down on Facebook"...
Tue Mar 20, 2018, 12:48 AM
Mar 2018

How, pray tell? Even if we do retake both houses of Congress in November, any legislation "to crack down on Facebook" would have to be signed by 45. Do you think he's going to bite the hand that delivered him his margin of victory in 2016, and may be able to do so again in 2020?


cbreezen

(694 posts)
5. Does Facebook censor bad news about Facebook?
Tue Mar 20, 2018, 01:15 AM
Mar 2018

In other words, we hear all about their news feeds. Do Facebook users actually know how Mark Zuckerberg has sold them out? Are they soft-peddling this?

I'm not a Facebooker. It's an honest question.

ETA: I ask this because Facebook users have always believed that their ability to communicate behind the wall, in the secret garden, have been protected by Mr. Zuckerberg. I post here on DU because I believe we shouldn't have to hide from ourselves or anyone else.

Do you DU?

LeftInTX

(25,258 posts)
7. This page has been around since 2010
Tue Mar 20, 2018, 02:52 AM
Mar 2018
https://www.facebook.com/Fuck-you-Mark-Zuckerberg-108780719167269/

Woah! I belong to about 40 anti-Trump groups on Facebook. The average day, I have at least 3 events scheduled. LOL- My resistance calendar is basically FB. This is on my schedule for today: Business Networking Seminar
SA Zoning Commission
SA Rise to SB4 (An anti-immigration bill)
Champions of Conservation
Resistance Choir Practice (Yes we have a choir!!)
How-tos of Grassroots Fundraising
Local school district bond presentation

I don't what you mean about walls, secret gardens and Zuckerberg?
 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
6. I'm angry that many sites seem to require Facebook
Tue Mar 20, 2018, 01:44 AM
Mar 2018

I tried to post a comment on 538 after the Virginia upset loss in the NCAA tournament, but they wanted me to sign in using Facebook to make the comment.

I don't do Facebook or any social media, so I departed. Their loss, because I had the answer to a betting question posed in that thread.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Politico: Angry Democrat...