Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pbmus

(12,422 posts) Fri Mar 23, 2018, 06:36 PM Mar 2018

Trump asks Congress for line-item veto on spending bills which Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional

Link to tweet

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump asks Congress for line-item veto on spending bills which Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional (Original Post) pbmus Mar 2018 OP

Yes - 20 years ago. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2018 #1

He was busy calling Frederick Douglass on his cell phone. Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #3

Unconstutional Matthew28 Mar 2018 #2

He is an ignorant know nothing. madaboutharry Mar 2018 #4

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,659 posts)

1. Yes - 20 years ago.

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Fri Mar 23, 2018, 06:38 PM

Mar 2018

Obviously he doesn't talk to anybody before he goes on TV and flaps his gums.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)

3. He was busy calling Frederick Douglass on his cell phone.

Reply to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #1)

Fri Mar 23, 2018, 06:53 PM

Mar 2018

Matthew28

(1,796 posts)

2. Unconstutional

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Fri Mar 23, 2018, 06:38 PM

Mar 2018

Idiot!

He wants it so he can kill(starve) some poor, disabled and poor people. Sick bastard.

If there's any truth to the bible then this guy is the freaking anti-Christ.

madaboutharry

(40,201 posts)

4. He is an ignorant know nothing.

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Fri Mar 23, 2018, 07:07 PM

Mar 2018

No doubt someone over at the White House has told him this, but he doesn't listen to anyone and he is unable to absorb information. He is a stupid man, among other things, such as being a low life pervert.

Reply to this discussion