General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNo one vetted Mitt
How did the Republican Party miss so many of Mitt's problems? You can thank his weak primary opponents.
Remember that Romneys most visible opponents during most of the nomination process were either dramatically underfunded or were otherwise unable to run a normal campaign with a fully staffed opposition research operation and the ability to effectively challenge Romney with what they learned. Rick Santorums campaign was almost comically understaffed; Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann and Newt Gingrich werent much better. Gingrich did benefit from outside attacks, but apparently didnt have the staff necessary (or perhaps the interest in deploying staff) to really know what in the ads was accurate and what wasnt, making it fairly easy for Romney to dismiss the whole thing once some questionable assertions were found. At any rate, most Republican opinion leaders didnt really want to hear that sort of attack in the first place, and so even a lot of anti-Romney Republicans didnt follow up on it.
http://www.salon.com/2012/07/29/mitt_romneys_unexamined_past/
global1
(25,224 posts)Turbineguy
(37,291 posts)The problem with the Romney Birther Movement taking hold here is that progressives just aren't that stupid.
C_U_L8R
(44,987 posts)and came to the conclusion that Sarah Palin was more capable.
'Nuff Said.
vinny9698
(1,016 posts)Cain, Newt, Trump were in it to sell books, and make a profit for themselves. Bachmann, Paul, were in it to push an ideology.
The serious candidates did not have any sugar daddies to support them. So, Romney was able to outspend his opponents by millions
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)palin ran for president for the entire time between elections, just not in the elections. and i'm sure she and her family made a ton of money.