General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNewsweek Cover: "Mitt The Wimp"
http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/28264293119/is-mitt-romney-a-wimp-thats-our-cover-this-week
warrior1
(12,325 posts)human-like, except with no empathy gene.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)The Insensate.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,674 posts)Lucy Goosey
(2,940 posts)Ouch. Awesome, of course, but ouch.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)He is devoid of any real instinct or personality. He laughs inappropriately, his voice never changes. He is speaking like someone who went through charm school, but without receiving any charm.
Something is wrong there... he is absolutely saying and doing whatever he needs to do, to get elected. I also think that he is one of those dangerous people who, immediately after the interview, EXPLODED at his staff and may have picked up the phone to scream at NEWSWEEK's staff as well.
He is CONTROLLED. That's the word. He is too controlled. He shows no emotions, lets out that laugh, then you know he loses it when he's off camera. Just like that video of him taking on the AP reporter that had the audacity to challenge him. And the way he went after the people at his nearly-empty campaign event in the primaries, still smiling.. but screaming at them.
PatSeg
(47,399 posts)You said it so well. If this guy has any redeeming qualities, he's keeping them under wraps.
BrendaBrick
(1,296 posts)5-3-2012
Renowned body language expert Tonya Reiman joined the PIX11 Morning News to take a closer look at Mitt Romney's body language.
In this interview, Reiman talked about Romney's gestures and expressions, including what his actions in his face, hands and arms mean.
Watch the video for the full interview.
http://www.wpix.com/news/morningnews/wpix-mitt-romney-body-language-decoder,0,6229930.story
MADem
(135,425 posts)That's one simmering, pissed off dude.
There is an undercurrent of tension in his voice. He doesn't sound decisive, he sounds stretched tight as a drum.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)calimary
(81,220 posts)"The episode highlights whats really wrong with Romney." Maybe we should start calling him wrong-ney?
MADem
(135,425 posts)BrendaBrick
(1,296 posts)Here's a clip with Body Language expert, Tonya Raiman commenting on the body language of Sarah Palin. In the first analysis, Raiman observes that Palin shakes her head no while saying yes to Charlie Gibson's question: "Do you think you're ready to be President?":
Given that (from the Daily Beast clip beginning at 2:20 mark)...is it me or does Romney shake his head no while saying: "I believe as people look at me, they'll see a person who has dealt with a number of very difficult and challenging circumstances (no) and that I've been able to successfully navigate through those and create greater strength and greater opportunity (no)..."
EnviroBat
(5,290 posts)The guy is like a fucking dumb-bot. Did you also notice the errie imitation the George HW Bush that he was attempting to pull off? It's like another "RNC Strategy" as of late to attempt to re-invent this asshole in the image of a previous president that the base can relate to. They know he can't pull off Regan, as he lacks any semblance of "charm" that the duddering old grandpa Ronnie had, so might as well go for Bush, but NOT the dumb one...
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)catbyte
(34,373 posts)progressoid
(49,978 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,287 posts)Wimp in Chief
Fozzledick
(3,860 posts)What did you think the "W" was for?
MADem
(135,425 posts)His son, George Wacky Bush, was a different thing altogether--but not a wimp.
FourScore
(9,704 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)And are you sure you want that address label on the Intertubes?
FourScore
(9,704 posts)I think it was during his first term. I was living in Germany and heard about it while I was over there.
yardwork
(61,588 posts)I think that Newsweek is signalling that they are backing Obama.
Tennessee Gal
(6,160 posts)If so, SWEET!!!!!!!!!!!
That picture really needs some photoshopped vampire teeth... anyone?
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)I tend to go with smarmy and crooked rather than "insecure" but this is better than nothing.
Hopefully the article will push the meme of "whats he hiding".
Goodonya, Newsweek.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)and vote him in figuring he'll gain confidence.
Focus: Tax returns, other illegalities, overseas bank accounts, flip-flops, Massachusetts record etc
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)as a "confidence builder" makes my blood run cold.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Definitely written for independents (lots of St Ronnie references). Not a single word about whats lurking in the tax returns though.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/07/29/michael-tomasky-a-candidate-with-a-serious-wimp-problem.html
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)>>
Dodging reports, fearing his base, hiding his taxesis Mitt Romney just too insecure to be president? In Newsweek, Michael Tomasky surves a history of presidential manliness and asks just where Mitt would fit amid the studly swagger of Dubya and Reagan.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Romney is a multimillionaire, maybe even a secret billionaire, I really don't think people will feel sorry for him, on the contrary the more people hear him talk, listen to him lie and avoid question about policy, his taxes, his time at Bain, etc. the more they can't stand the guy! Maybe a few republicans might fee sorry for him, hold their nose and vote for him come election time, but I don't think anyone else will.
His problem with moderate republicans is that he is kissing up to the really crazy part of the party, the teabaggers and the loons, and they don't like that. He is afraid to come back to the center because he fears losing the far, far, far crazy right, and if he continues to stay out there kissing up to the crazies, he may lose some of the moderate republicans. That is a true sing of a "wimp"! He has really painted himself into a corner, one he is having a very hard time getting out of.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)I just would like to see him busted for his taxes!
But I see what you're saying -- the wimp idea is less harsh and could be more effective in sowing doubt.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)It was actually an interesting read. Little too much Bush/Reagan worship for my taste, but I am not the intended audience. I think he made a great case for the insecurity (and yes, Daddy) issue - the latter was definitely hinted at as being the possible core of this Rombot personality.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)PERFECT!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)During the Primary when all the other Republicans piled on Mitt:
[img][/img]
B Calm
(28,762 posts)TahitiNut
(71,611 posts)It's not a draft deferment. Sadly, a 2-year "sojourn" in France wearing a dark suit and tie with a white shirt was a deferment. I've never understood why the LDS calls that a "mission" since they did nothing for the poor and merely proselytized -- which is illegal in many Islamic countries.
Submariner
(12,503 posts)instead of passing out mormon bibles door-to-door on the Champs-Elysées.
Mountain Meadows Mitt is nothing more than a draft dodging chickenhawk f'ing coward....period.
charlie
(15,665 posts)Which is the most cowardly chest-puffery I've heard since Tom Delay complained about "minorities" stealing his opportunity to bust Cong ass.
marlakay
(11,451 posts)Into joining up if he wanted the military so bad...
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)You are BAD!!
BumRushDaShow
(128,856 posts)including "Romney: The LIAR factor. He he just too untrustworthy to be President?" or "Romney: The Tax Evader. Is he just too shady to be President?".
DCBob
(24,689 posts)This is good. Just adds to the list of things not to like about Romney.
AllyCat
(16,177 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)it COULDN'T happen with Bush and looked what happened to Iraq, Afghanistan, U.S., and now Pakistan.
Do not underestimate how far the world hegemony will go, ESPECIALLY with a mediocrity heading up the U.S. division. The financial de-stabilization of the World, due to the Derivative Crash of '08 and the bottom-less pit known as LIBOR, makes WAR a very very bullish market and BushKochChurchCoC will be right there backing Cheney and Romney up. WATCH who Romney picks for VP!
Initech
(100,063 posts)They're purposefully tanking our economy and killing the job market to make the military seem like it's the only choice to land a job that's not food service or retail. And they'll get it too.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)He has a nice new heart and experience...
starting wars!
Poiuyt
(18,122 posts)nolabear
(41,959 posts)Iraq? Afghanistan? Syria?
Wimp, sure, but my overwhelming impression is, as always, that there's no there there. He's just programmed.
Creeps me the hell out. He'd sacrifice us and our grandchildren if he thought his powerful friends would benefit.
patrice
(47,992 posts)CONGRESS!!!
Berlum
(7,044 posts)...only toooo happy to send your kids off far overseas to fight and die, while he and his
1% spawn stay at home to count up their war profits, and devise Cayman Island tax dodges.
Sooooooo Republican.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)Romney took 4 deferments, and said that his own boys were serving their Country by campaigning for him. I don't think GHWB even likes the guy... who does?
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Initech
(100,063 posts)WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)An important step to take.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Cassandra
(9,694 posts)or does Newsweek?
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)appleannie1
(5,067 posts)FSogol
(45,476 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)But there are a few good names for mittens!e
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Isn't playing dress-up as a macho man the same as being a real macho man? Oh, and like W he was also a cheerleader. What could be more macho?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)That is called the Sadistic Boss === NOT
joost5
(421 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)Welcome to DU!
The DU community has been so welcoming *group hug*
DinahMoeHum
(21,783 posts)n/t
CTyankee
(63,903 posts)candidate (from a major party).
ificandream
(9,363 posts)You can hear that echoing all through the echo chambers on the right.
lostnote12
(159 posts)media contest.....with the media firmly in control by the RW I hesitate to think of the bloating that will ensue wrt the MICs supposed demise<again>.....maybe I'm just over reacting but I put nothing pass KKKarl Rove and his ilk!!!!
Beacool
(30,247 posts)That's supposed to be a fair and balanced title for the cover of the magazine?
I hope that Mittens loses because the nation can't afford another Republican in the WH, but that cover is a joke. No wonder I read recently that Newsweek may seize to publish in print form in he near future.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Got America into this mess, remember during the Clinton presidency when they used that as an excuse to bash Hillary Clinton? And yes Mitt has something that leads people to distrust him, though I would not have used wimp. My article would have been "No confidence?", as Mitt is far weaker then he should be given the money he spends.
Please, do not give the GOP any crumb they can make into a loaf. If Mitt wins, they will make damned sure Hillary does NOT get to run in 2016.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I don't think that Romney is a wimp. Although I do think that he's more moderate than the RW faction of his party allows him to be, but to be a moderate would be the kiss of death to him or any other Republican. That party has been taken over by the extreme right Tea Party kooks.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)And raise you that if Mitt TRIED to be moderate, he would be impeached or worse, especially if he is stupid enough to put someone like Paul Ryan or Rand Paul as his VP, someone who could do a LOT of damage.
And while I know you will probably vote Hillary in 2016, you know what she would advise, namely because the same GOP that acted like her friend would try to kill her.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)We'll see.
As for Hillary, I hope that after some rest she changes her mind and runs in 2016. I still think that she would be a magnificent president. Another "we'll see".
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)IF she tells Bill "we should not attack Bain"
Bill "we should allow the pipeline"
Bill "let's hire Mark Penn"
if she tells Bill to get in the BACK SEAT..
and it would help if she told Bennie Netanyahu that too.
rurallib
(62,406 posts)jade3000
(238 posts)Is the Newsweek so desperate for readers that they'll throw votes to Romney? That's all this cover is going to do. It makes him more sympathetic that the so-called liberal media is attacking him.
And the "problem" isn't that he's a wimp. It's that he's socially awkward and has a difficult time connecting with people. The reason he made those statements in Britian was not to show he's tough. It's because he's awkward.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)calimary
(81,220 posts)BeastSlayer
9 hours ago
Coward, wimp, hiding in France to avoid Vietnam, spineless, lacking in moral courage...
But has the nerve to accuse Obama of appeasement. The same president who got Bin Ladin, two Somali pirates, the entire leadership of Al Queda and stare down Putin to pull back Russian ship bringing helicopters to Assad...
Let's see, is there even a comparison?
Good reminder!!! Don't forget the Somali pirates that he dispensed with, early in his first year.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Our corporate media pushes the fluff Jerry Springer headlines. Next week we will all be upset, because it'll be some fluff about Obama.
Never talk about NSA spy centers, militarized police, the million homeless American schoolchildren, the immunity for LIBOR banksters....
We are in deep, deep trouble in this country...
Javaman
(62,517 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)A liar, a racist, out of touch, a deceptor, animal hater, and now a wimp. I could go on and on.
Wait, is he still running? Self destruction is nearing an all time high.
cleduc
(653 posts)The troubling thing about Romney's many, many flip-flops is that it makes you wonder about his ability to think things through. Sure, there's some pandering involved. And I'm not suggesting he's stupid - he isn't. But when I read Audacity of Hope, it seemed to be written by a man who had deeply thought about the issues and we had his vision clearly articulated with an audit trail based upon facts, logic and reason on how he arrived at his positions on the issues. And since that writing, he's largely stuck to those thoughts or you can see how he evolved on those issues as he went along.
With Romney, he strikes me as having a swashbuckling management style. There is no deep under current of a long term vision. Yes, he'll use some visionary terms in his speeches but there's no substantive trail of how he got there and nor a trustworthy conviction on where he's going.
There are safe guards in the structure of the US government (congress and the judicial branch for example) to help minimize errors made by the executive branch. But the "most powerful man on earth" is described that way for a number of reasons. As we all know, the president faces critical moments during their term in office. I'm much less concerned with the wimp factor than I am the swashbuckling factor because once some of these critical decisions get made, flip-flopping isn't on the menu of what they can practically do next. The ability to think things through has to be an essential requirement for the job. Of the two candidates, only one of them has a decent track record demonstrating he has that ability.