HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » So they only fucked once,...

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:14 PM

 

So they only fucked once, and she is THAT dangerous to him....I don't get it...

what am I missing here, kids??

67 replies, 4755 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 67 replies Author Time Post
Reply So they only fucked once, and she is THAT dangerous to him....I don't get it... (Original post)
jodymarie aimee Mar 2018 OP
Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #1
dhol82 Mar 2018 #3
Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #16
IluvPitties Mar 2018 #20
Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #23
Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #28
IluvPitties Mar 2018 #34
Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #43
Exotica Mar 2018 #31
Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #44
Exotica Mar 2018 #45
Ms. Toad Mar 2018 #52
Rhiannon12866 Mar 2018 #32
Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #35
Rhiannon12866 Mar 2018 #41
fierywoman Mar 2018 #53
bearsfootball516 Mar 2018 #2
Freelancer Mar 2018 #4
GusBob Mar 2018 #5
SummerSnow Mar 2018 #30
The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2018 #51
eShirl Mar 2018 #61
LisaL Mar 2018 #6
Tumbulu Mar 2018 #7
leftstreet Mar 2018 #11
Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #12
LisaL Mar 2018 #14
Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #21
Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #22
Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #25
Orange Free State Mar 2018 #47
IluvPitties Mar 2018 #24
Tumbulu Mar 2018 #48
IluvPitties Mar 2018 #49
Tumbulu Mar 2018 #50
Pachamama Mar 2018 #58
DeminPennswoods Mar 2018 #62
Skittles Mar 2018 #60
Tatiana Mar 2018 #8
Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #9
KewlKat Mar 2018 #40
Va Lefty Mar 2018 #10
SunSeeker Mar 2018 #13
mr_lebowski Mar 2018 #54
SunSeeker Mar 2018 #64
Kirk Lover Mar 2018 #15
Arazi Mar 2018 #17
PunksMom Mar 2018 #18
Clarity2 Mar 2018 #27
Freethinker65 Mar 2018 #19
nadine_mn Mar 2018 #26
renegade000 Mar 2018 #29
Siwsan Mar 2018 #33
sharedvalues Mar 2018 #37
Siwsan Mar 2018 #42
sharedvalues Mar 2018 #36
stonecutter357 Mar 2018 #38
UCmeNdc Mar 2018 #57
blogslut Mar 2018 #39
world wide wally Mar 2018 #46
underthematrix Mar 2018 #55
UCmeNdc Mar 2018 #56
blugbox Mar 2018 #67
pnwmom Mar 2018 #59
Orange Free State Mar 2018 #63
AgadorSparticus Mar 2018 #65
NurseJackie Mar 2018 #66

Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:18 PM

1. Was it while Melania was pregnant?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #1)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:20 PM

3. Does not matter

Itís weird that this small act would provoke such an episode.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #1)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:30 PM

16. I looked at the timing ...the kid could be Trumps...she says it was with a boyfriend but unless she

had a DNA test, how would she know. She had unprotected sex. This may be why paternity was mentioned...dollar to donuts this could be Trump's kid or he is afraid the kid could be his kid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #16)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:32 PM

20. That would be a story.

However, not impressed so far.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to IluvPitties (Reply #20)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:34 PM

23. It would explain why paternity was mentioned in the contract.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to IluvPitties (Reply #20)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:40 PM

28. IDK what "not impressed" means. If this was a democrat, they would be gone from govt by morning

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #28)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:43 PM

34. This is Donald Trump we are talking about here.

A tabloid president. This type of thing won't bring him down...

Mueller will.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #28)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 09:06 PM

43. Nope I am wrong...I had the affair wrong..the affair was in 2006 not 2011

That is when she told her story but it was not published. Someone said paternity was standard in these contracts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #16)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:41 PM

31. The child was born in 2010 or 2011, if Trump and Daniels had sex once in 2006

 

(per her own words) how could it be Trump's?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Exotica (Reply #31)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 09:07 PM

44. I thought they had sex I 2011...my mistake that was when she first tried to tell her story.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #44)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 09:11 PM

45. yes, 2011 was when she first tried to talk about it

 

The entire thing is sickening, and I hope it, in some small way, helps bring down Trump.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 01:43 AM

52. 5 years is a pretty long pregnancy. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #1)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:43 PM

32. From what we've heard, she had already given birth.

And during the interview, she said she brought that up and he just dismissed it. What a guy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rhiannon12866 (Reply #32)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:45 PM

35. He could have told her, and then she could have told Anderson that he

paid to have people killed who sued him.

It would not matter to his base, so the argument that this interview doesnt matter, makes no sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #35)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:54 PM

41. Well, I'm sure it was a big ratings success for CBS, so there's that

And she did come off as credible. What I meant that he just dismissed that he had a wife and new baby at home. And who would have ever imagined that this would become mainstream news about an American president?? Jimmy Carter was vilified for having "lust in his heart" and Obama wore that tan suit!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 02:06 AM

53. No, she'd given birth the Barron 4 months before.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:20 PM

2. It wasnt really anything that we didnt already know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:20 PM

4. Having infidelity proven opens him up more to other suits, I'm guessing -nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:21 PM

5. I liked the part where she goes

' oh god here we go '

But no, not attracted to him at all

Then she cock-blocked him the next time he touched her. Grabbed her purse and left

Sums up his presidency don't it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GusBob (Reply #5)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:41 PM

30. She said she was not attracted to him and didnt want sex with him

but did it anyway.Weird

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SummerSnow (Reply #30)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 01:32 AM

51. I think the sex was transactional for her and not lust-based.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SummerSnow (Reply #30)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 06:33 AM

61. I know, he's so dreamy

how could anyone not want him ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:22 PM

6. I guess nothing shocks people about Trump anymore.

He might as well be teflon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:23 PM

7. You are missing that they pad 130k to keep her quiet

And that he used his position of power to get that unprotected sex with her.

And that he did this right after Melanie gave birth.

What are you missing?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tumbulu (Reply #7)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:25 PM

11. I think they wasted their money

Unless there's something she's not telling, it seems stupid

His core supporters of 'conservative' white males will only admire him more after this, as they would have if they'd heard it pre-election

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tumbulu (Reply #7)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:25 PM

12. or does anyone know how old the daughter is? Could she be Trump's kid?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #12)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:28 PM

14. Oh for crying out loud.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #12)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:32 PM

21. Reading a lot of "nothing to see here" , i bet if this was about you know who

it would be lots to see

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #21)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:33 PM

22. She is 7 and there was paternity mentioned in the agreement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #22)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:35 PM

25. Regardless of that, I get suspicious when I see anyone imply "nothing to see here"

but yes, i wasnt even thinking of this child, I was thinking of why Melania would be so pissed and that he would be afraid she would turn on him and tell the truth about his many crimes and treason

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #22)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 09:28 PM

47. Its probably just boilerplate language...

...put into all the agreements he signs with women.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tumbulu (Reply #7)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:34 PM

24. You are implying she was forced or pressured.

However, she had no issue turning him down after the first time, and she, a 40 yr old woman, does not see herself as a victim of anything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to IluvPitties (Reply #24)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 09:45 PM

48. No she does not, but she was

and if you don't see that there was a power imbalance that in subsequent meetings she was able to extricate herself from, you are missing a lot.

You don't have to see it. I sure do, and I bet a lot of other people saw as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tumbulu (Reply #48)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 09:58 PM

49. So you are saying that she couldn't have just decided, out of her volition, to have sex with him

to see if she could get something out of it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to IluvPitties (Reply #49)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 01:08 AM

50. Maybe, but this is a woman who makes a living

using her body as currency. In this case she chose to just go along ( although she made sure not to get stuck again going forward). So there is this sense that she went along ...and with unprotected sex, not really a good idea.

Sorry, I call it coerced because it is her default position. And she does not think it was coerced because it is normal to her. But looking at it from the outside, it is quite the opposite.

His assuming that they would have sex because she went to the bathroom is imposing to say the least.

I am reading this reaction from plenty of women. Plenty of women have gotten stuck in sucky sex situations where it is easier to just go along and get out asap. That does not actually make it truly consensual.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tumbulu (Reply #50)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 05:17 AM

58. +1000

Agree

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to IluvPitties (Reply #49)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 07:17 AM

62. She explained that

she ended up being intimate with Trump because she allowed herself to get into a situation where he expected it. But she was very clear that she was not a victim and sex was consensual.

I found it interesting that she didn't want to pegged as part of the metoo movement because she felt that takes away the focus from real victims of harrassment and assault.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tumbulu (Reply #7)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 06:24 AM

60. we already knew that

so what is the point of interviewing Ms. Daniels besides giving her the attention she craves?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:24 PM

8. He denied it happened.

So I think it *should* (but probably won't) call into question his credibility with the Trumpers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:24 PM

9. She has a kid...paternity is mentioned in the agreement...I have to wonder if the kid is Donald's.

He didn't use protection.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #9)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:54 PM

40. I believe it was mentioned that that was standard language in all his NDAs. They covered all bases.

SOP.

I also recall that she planned on that child and selected the father. It's not the orange spankies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:25 PM

10. $$$$$

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:27 PM

13. It's his M.O. of paying hush money that is the story.

Not only is it a blatant campaign finance violation, but it shows he will do anything to cover up dirt from his past. You know, like agree to drop sanctions against an enemy of the US. This is quite a piece of corroborating evidence in the Russia probe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SunSeeker (Reply #13)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 02:41 AM

54. Exactly what it would be every second of Faux if this were a Dem ... "President Blackmailed ...

By Porn Star (Sex happened while Wife was nursing their 4mo. old!!!)."

They be beside themselves over how this proves the POTUS ... can be blackmailed and how dangerous that is.

Wall-to-wall, all day for the next week. Endless pearl clutching, the whole 9.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mr_lebowski (Reply #54)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 11:40 AM

64. Yep. And they'd have a point, for once. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:28 PM

15. This case is going to be a big problem for Don-o. So goes one NDA so can go the rest.

 

Plus she was pressured to sign it under duress. Tsk Tsk Tsk. Paying hush money right before a campaign is also very bad indeed. Avenetti knows this must be a good case or else he wouldn't be pursing it. Cooper called him a Dem operative. I knew I liked that guy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:30 PM

17. Thinking it's a violation of the pre-nup

Melania cashes in

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:31 PM

18. Im thinking theres more...

I could be wrong, but thatís just my opinion

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PunksMom (Reply #18)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:39 PM

27. Youre right...now that I recall

I could have sworn there were more meetings. With the family, jr., at same hotels as the other woman. But I cant keep track of anything anymore.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:31 PM

19. She isn't dangerous to him. However, she is one of many.

There is a pattern of him fucking around, or attempting to, and then once successful, paying the women off to keep their silence.

The payoffs for silence is actually more disturbing than the fucking around. He's bragged about fucking around for years. He fucked around on all of his wives. He is free to consensually fuck whoever he wants (if of legal age).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:38 PM

26. It's the payoff before the election, and that he isn't the stud he thinks he is

The legal problem is the $$ paid right after the access hollywood tape and the before the election

what hurts Trump's ego is just how lame he is... that she wasn't that into him, that he isn't the stud muffin he thinks he is, where he was always trying to get with her and she was like - eww no

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:40 PM

29. He's a bully...

He just likes to throw his weight around and shut people up.

You should watch "You've Been Trumped," about him bullying the locals of a small Scottish town by one of his golf courses. The man is scum.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:43 PM

33. I still think we're missing a piece of the picture - about the timing and need for a payoff

She had the most casual of 'relationships' with him. Nothing more than a one nighter and it sounds like he's no stranger to that concept. So why the need for all of this cover up? It all pretty weird.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Siwsan (Reply #33)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:48 PM

37. Because she was about to go public right before the election

Remeber back to Oct 2016. Bannon had paraded Bill Clinton's accusers out at a debate. Access Hollywood had come out but been squelched in the media by the Russians.

Sex and women and misogyny were a clear weakness of the president that his team was trying desperately to manage.

If Stormy had gone public a few weeks before the election, it could have sunk him. So it was a BIG DEAL to silence her. And others too, appaarently.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sharedvalues (Reply #37)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:55 PM

42. Well, supposedly Bannon did say they had to take care of around 100 women. Ick

So maybe the payment was so low because they were paying off so many. Her attorney did say that 6 more women have contacted him.

But the point still is that everybody already knew about his sexual proclivities so why the massive need to hide things? That just doesn't make sense to me. The cat was already out of the bag, so to speak. Anyway, that's where I'm hitting the wall.

Her attorney is going to be on 'The View' tomorrow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:46 PM

36. Check out the tweets here - this explains why dangerous

At least a few things

- potential campaign finance lawbreaking
- exposing his weakness and compromising his masculinity
- alleged threats from presidential heavies. what did Schiller and Cohen know? Stuff like this is what brought down Nixon

see tweets here
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210413434

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:48 PM

38. I think it's an STD .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stonecutter357 (Reply #38)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 04:56 AM

57. Right, I kept wondering why she emphasis

Unprotected sex.

Maybe Trump gave her something.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:48 PM

39. Say you're a guy with a lot of money, a third wife and a lot to lose.

Ivana got $14 million and that was extraordinary at the time. Their divorce was news fodder for months. Whatever pre-nup he and Melania have, ain't nobody predicted this situation back in 2005. Mrs. FLOTUS got lots to bargain with this time.

Not only does he not want to pay for a divorce settlement, can you imagine how M.E.S.S.Y. a White House divorce would be with that bastard in office? Agenda? Haha! Every republican in the nation will be sucked up in the Hoover of broken marriage drama.

(Title hat tip to Dave Anthony)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Sun Mar 25, 2018, 09:19 PM

46. He is the President,

He has threatened to sue her for $20 M, he had her physically threatened, he has lied about it.
He is an asshole.
Enough for me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 03:02 AM

55. This was an interesting interview.

Stormy had sex with Trump about 4 months after Melanie had her son. According to Trump, his marriage did not include sharing a bedroom or sex. Did she use in vitro fertilization

Like Karen McRougal, Stormy said Trump compared her to his daughter Ivanka. Now if other women come forward and say the same thing, we're talking about a much deeper problem.

It appears Cohen threatened her with physical harm through one of Trump's thugs which occurred before she signed the NDA.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 04:49 AM

56. Something is missing

Why is Trump so worried about what happened?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UCmeNdc (Reply #56)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 04:24 PM

67. You mean

So worried about what didn't happen... They are still officially denying it. Makes even less sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 06:00 AM

59. Cooper said later there were many "tawdry details" edited out of the story. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pnwmom (Reply #59)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 07:22 AM

63. Brace for leak of tawdry details in 5..4..3..2..1.....n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 04:13 PM

65. It has nothing to do with the illicit sex. Unless it is really out there like incest.

It is always the cover up. It is illegal if he used campaign funds to hush her up, though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 04:14 PM

66. He's very self-conscious and embarrassed by his micropenis...

... and doesn't want anyone talking about it.

(That's my guess.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread