Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(170,963 posts)
Wed Mar 28, 2018, 05:12 PM Mar 2018

Obama Returns to Help a Vulnerable Senate Democrat

Obama Returns to Help a Vulnerable Senate Democrat

By Josh Voorhees
March 28, 20181:34 PM


Barack Obama is getting back in the game. The former president plans to hold a fundraiser for Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill this spring, his first appearance for an individual candidate since leaving office.

According to an invitation obtained by Politico, the May 6 event will take place in Beverly Hills, California, and it will come with the usual glitzy trappings. Filmmaker Steven Spielberg, executive Jeffrey Katzenberg, director J.J. Abrams, and his wife, Katie McGrath, will host, and the final guest list is expected to include a number of other Hollywood players.* The invitation didn’t list ticket prices for the event but given the location and the headliner, it’s a safe bet it will bring in a boatload of cash for McCaskill.

She’s going to need it.

McCaskill is one of 10 Senate Democrats up for re-election this year in states that went for Donald Trump two years ago. Of those 10, McCaskill is one of four that nonpartisan handicappers see as the most vulnerable this November (the others: Heidi Heitkamp in North Dakota, Joe Manchin in West Virginia, and Joe Donnelly in Indiana). Given Democrats have only a handful of legitimate pickup opportunities of their own, defending those seats will be crucial if they are going to retake control of the Senate next year.

Trump won Missouri by 19 points over Hillary Clinton two years ago, and Clinton hasn’t made McCaskill’s life any easier since then. Republicans are currently running digital attack ads linking McCaskill to a pair of remarks Clinton made about Trump voters: her “basket of deplorables” comments in 2016 and similar ones she made earlier this month about Trump appealing to voters by “looking backwards.” That’s left McCaskill to do an awkward dance whereby she defends Trump voters while still trying not to alienate her base of Clinton voters, some of whom feel the same about the president and his supporters as the woman they wanted to see in the White House does.

McCaskill will be far more excited to be linked to Obama, who she backed over Clinton early in their 2008 nominating fight. Obama lost Missouri that year, but only by a narrow 4,000 votes. In 2012, he lost to Mitt Romney by about 200,000 votes, while Clinton lost to Trump by roughly half a million votes in the state. Clinton has somehow become even more unpopular nationally since then, a rarity for a losing presidential candidate and all the more remarkable given just how unpopular she was during the campaign. Obama, meanwhile, has only become more popular in the age of Trump. According to Gallup, his job approval rating was at 59 percent when he left office, about 11 points higher than he averaged during his eight years in office. America’s collective memory has only grown fonder since then. Last month, 63 percent said that in hindsight they approve of the job he did as president. If Obama’s willing to make the rounds on the midterm circuit, the vast majority of Democrats will be thrilled to have him.

more...

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/03/obama-returns-to-give-claire-mccaskill-a-fundraising-boost.html

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Returns to Help a Vulnerable Senate Democrat (Original Post) babylonsister Mar 2018 OP
I miss having a real POTUS Gothmog Mar 2018 #1
A fundraiser in Beverly Hills? gratuitous Mar 2018 #2
She's already doing that babylonsister Mar 2018 #3
Good! gratuitous Mar 2018 #5
She Rebl2 Mar 2018 #14
Please do not do teasers like that. sheshe2 Mar 2018 #4
Awwww... babylonsister Mar 2018 #6
I want him back. sheshe2 Mar 2018 #8
Me too. NurseJackie Mar 2018 #9
Hey you. sheshe2 Mar 2018 #10
So Clinton hurts her in Missouri... NCTraveler Mar 2018 #7
A Beverly Hills fundraiser with Hollywood people. Lucky Luciano Mar 2018 #11
Sadly, there are some who are (supposedly) on our side... NurseJackie Mar 2018 #12
I am ok with contested primaries. Blue_true Mar 2018 #13

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. A fundraiser in Beverly Hills?
Wed Mar 28, 2018, 05:34 PM
Mar 2018

Hmmm. I'm sure the bump in campaign contributions will be appreciated by Sen. McCaskill, but I'd far rather see McCaskill stumping around Missouri with local Democratic candidates. Get away from the cities and hit the rural hustings. Stage a rally and talk directly to folks. Call up the local newspaper and radio station and provide them some content without the Fox filter.

babylonsister

(170,963 posts)
3. She's already doing that
Wed Mar 28, 2018, 06:19 PM
Mar 2018

according to this...at least she was in February.

There is also the fact that she has been stumping all over Missouri while he has mostly remained on the job in Jefferson City.


http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/missouri-ag-hawley-now-facing-whispers-of-buyer-s-remorse/article_296ef39b-2c54-5b93-b2ec-33540fad03ed.html

Missouri AG Hawley now facing whispers of buyer's remorse within party

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
5. Good!
Wed Mar 28, 2018, 06:39 PM
Mar 2018

Keep it up, Senator. In this political climate, there's really no reason a Democrat needs to hide from the Democratic platform.

And that article you linked to is hilarious. Scandalized, the Republicans of Missouri are, that Sen. McCaskill is playing politics in a political campaign! Just unheard of! Mercy!

Rebl2

(13,311 posts)
14. She
Wed Mar 28, 2018, 08:29 PM
Mar 2018

does get out in the rural areas to speak with constituents. Senator Blunt to my knowledge never holds town hall meetings like Senator McCaskill does. I do wish she wouldn’t hold fundraisers in California though. I can just see the GOP ads they will run against her now getting money from the “holiywood elite”. Doesn’t help in my opinion.

sheshe2

(83,343 posts)
8. I want him back.
Wed Mar 28, 2018, 06:47 PM
Mar 2018

I want his wisdom. His wit. His and his families beautiful souls.

Sorry, I am weepy tonight.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
7. So Clinton hurts her in Missouri...
Wed Mar 28, 2018, 06:43 PM
Mar 2018

But a Beverly Hills fundraiser will look good to the deplorables.

Go Obama. We miss you.

Dear Clinton, you aren’t helping the deplorables find their way. Please use larger words when slapping them in the face.

McCaskill for the win!

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
12. Sadly, there are some who are (supposedly) on our side...
Wed Mar 28, 2018, 07:28 PM
Mar 2018
McCaskill is one of 10 Senate Democrats up for re-election this year in states that went for Donald Trump two years ago. Of those 10, McCaskill is one of four that nonpartisan handicappers see as the most vulnerable this November (the others: Heidi Heitkamp in North Dakota, Joe Manchin in West Virginia, and Joe Donnelly in Indiana). Given Democrats have only a handful of legitimate pickup opportunities of their own, defending those seats will be crucial if they are going to retake control of the Senate next year.
Sadly, there are some who are (supposedly) on our side who hate those DEMOCRATS so much, that they want to "primary them" and weaken them, and bankrupt them early-on... and try to replace them with Vermont-style liberals who could NEVER win the General Election in those states anyway.

It just amazes me that for reasons of their own pride, they'd prefer to do everything possible to sabotage the "imperfect" Democrat who CAN win the state... just so that we can lose the seat to the GOP.

Math! Every "D" counts when it comes to regaining control... but there's a myopic element that continues to have an all-or-nothing mindset which holds us back.

VOTE DEMOCRATIC!!

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
13. I am ok with contested primaries.
Wed Mar 28, 2018, 08:12 PM
Mar 2018

What I am not ok with is the loser not avidly backing the party nominee. Virginia is a perfect example, there was a fierce primary on the Democratic and republican side for Governor, and several down ticket democratic primaries. But in the General democrats came together and won big in that state. I am watching Texas with some concern, several primaries pitting dem against dem, will the loser back the winner 100%? I don't know, some of the primaries have Our Revolution type candidates, that group sat out the Georgia House race, the Alabama US Senate race and the PA House race because the democrat didn't "excite" them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Returns to Help a V...