HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Trump not a "target." Qu...

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 08:35 PM

Trump not a "target." Question for federal criminal attorneys.

I have a question, or maybe a theory, about the report that Mueller has told Trump's lawyers that he is not presently a "target."

Might that only mean that Mueller does not intend (at least for now) to seek an indictment? For instance, if Mueller has concluded a sitting President cannot (or ought not) be indicted but intends to report criminal activity in his report to Congress, would that explain this report?

Extension on edit: The guests on Chris Hayes were just advancing my theory, so maybe I'm not too far out there.

20 replies, 2074 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 20 replies Author Time Post
Reply Trump not a "target." Question for federal criminal attorneys. (Original post)
TomSlick Apr 2018 OP
Xipe Totec Apr 2018 #1
BigmanPigman Apr 2018 #2
Xipe Totec Apr 2018 #7
The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2018 #3
TomSlick Apr 2018 #5
The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2018 #6
madaboutharry Apr 2018 #4
Leghorn21 Apr 2018 #8
fierywoman Apr 2018 #9
TomSlick Apr 2018 #10
bdamomma Apr 2018 #11
TomSlick Apr 2018 #12
bdamomma Apr 2018 #14
GallopingGhost Apr 2018 #13
TomSlick Apr 2018 #15
HipChick Apr 2018 #16
tblue37 Apr 2018 #17
Cha Apr 2018 #18
EffieBlack Apr 2018 #19
TomSlick Apr 2018 #20

Response to TomSlick (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 08:38 PM

1. He's just a collection of concentric circles in an alternating red and white pattern. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Xipe Totec (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 08:42 PM

2. Bulls eye!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BigmanPigman (Reply #2)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 08:57 PM

7. If we hit that bullseye the rest of the dominos will fall like a house of cards

Checkmate


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 08:42 PM

3. It doesn't really mean that much because subjects can turn into targets.

According to the DOJ Handbook, a “subject” is “a person whose conduct is within the scope of a grand jury’s investigation.” A subject is somewhere between a target and a witness. A subject has engaged in conduct that may look suspicious or unethical, but the prosecutor isn’t certain that a provable crime has been committed and wants to do more investigating in order to be sure. The fact that someone is a subject and not a target means only that at this particular time they don't have enough evidence to call him a target (someone as to whom the prosecutor or Grand Jury has substantial evidence linking him to the commission of a crime). It does not mean they are off the hook. If more evidence is developed his status could change from subject to target. It would appear that notifying Trump that he is not a target at this time might be a way to persuade him to agree to an interview with Mueller.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #3)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 08:48 PM

5. I appreciate that a "no target" letter is not worth much but

Mueller strikes me as a really stand-up kinda guy. I don't think he would intentionally mislead.

I also suspect that Mueller would accept the current DoJ position that a sitting President cannot be indicted - only impeached. If Meuller doesn't intend to impeach but only report to Congress, then Trump is not a "target." It may be a tad over-lawyerly but that's my theory.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Reply #5)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 08:50 PM

6. I don't think he's misleading at all.

He probably doesn't have enough evidence to issue a target letter - but he might be hoping to get that evidence by interviewing Trump, who will lie his head off.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 08:48 PM

4. Chris Hayes just spoke with a former DOJ prosecutor

who is now a criminal defense attorney. He told Chris that that status can change an hour later and should be of no comfort to Trump or his lawyers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madaboutharry (Reply #4)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:04 PM

8. *NO COMFORT FOR YOU, ASSHOLE* - thanks for posting, madabout!!

I have no clue wth is going on, but I like what yer sayin!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:12 PM

9. I can't wait for the "I'm not a target" gleeful tweet. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fierywoman (Reply #9)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:14 PM

10. Seems inevitable - if stupid.

Oh wait, that's inevitable too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:16 PM

11. Things may turn

he (don the con) could end up being a target, if they let their guard down. Could it happen??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bdamomma (Reply #11)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:20 PM

12. That much I'm clear on.

A "subject" can get a "not a target" letter today and become a target tomorrow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Reply #12)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:27 PM

14. please

let it happen, may be they are setting him up for a fall.....I can only wish.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:26 PM

13. Not an attorney,

but Mueller told this to 45's attorneys last month, apparently. Just because he wasn't a target at that time doesn't mean he isn't one now. Mueller told them Twitler wasn't "currently" a criminal target. Important word.

If Twitler is drawing a huge sigh of relief, he shouldn't be, although he'll be tweet-ranting shortly like the madman he is about how he's been completely exonerated.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GallopingGhost (Reply #13)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:30 PM

15. Agreed.

On all points.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:42 PM

16. Oh wait...did the Washington Post break this scoop?

May he go straight to target

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:44 PM

17. Emphasis added:

"Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III informed President Trump’s attorneys last month that he is continuing to investigate the president but does not consider him a criminal target at this point. . . ."


More:

"In private negotiations in early March about a possible presidential interview, Mueller described Trump as a subject of his investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. Prosecutors view someone as a subject when that person has engaged in conduct that is under investigation but there is not sufficient evidence to bring charges."


He is collecting that evidence. He knows that when you go at the "king," you have to make sure to strike true, because you don't get a second chance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:44 PM

18. Public Enemy #1 has been Obstructing

Justice in Plain Sight.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomSlick (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 09:59 PM

19. Once he names him as a target, Mueller loses a little flexibility

 

Trump may gloat, but he's just whistling in the wind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EffieBlack (Reply #19)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 10:01 PM

20. Or whistling past the grave yard - I hope.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread