Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

syringis

(5,101 posts)
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 05:35 PM Apr 2018

Thank you Dr Rachel Maddow

Last edited Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:42 PM - Edit history (2)

We don't have MSNBC in Belgium, but I often watch you on Youtube. I've never been deceived.

If I were to personify journalism excellency, your name would come first.



NB :thank you all. I learned how to use appropriately “Miss”, “Mrs” and “Ms”. I have initially (mis)used “Mrs” to show respect to Rachel Maddow.

84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thank you Dr Rachel Maddow (Original Post) syringis Apr 2018 OP
Yeah, what she said! Wounded Bear Apr 2018 #1
I can't find any reference to Rachel LittleGirl Apr 2018 #58
You may be right... Wounded Bear Apr 2018 #65
same here. I try not to follow celebrities too. eom LittleGirl Apr 2018 #75
All the best women are taken, dang it. n/t SonofDonald Apr 2018 #76
LOL eom LittleGirl Apr 2018 #80
kick triron Apr 2018 #2
Very rare for someone to simultaneously be a super patriot and a super journalist. Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #3
Well Rachel started her own kind of genre within journalism lunatica Apr 2018 #74
Well done with this description. Some find her method of taking 12 minutes to Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #77
I think most people are still expecting to hear what happens rather lunatica Apr 2018 #79
I've been BEYOND impressed with her since Unfiltered on Air America Radio Dennis Donovan Apr 2018 #4
Fox News offered her big bucks Elwood P Dowd Apr 2018 #5
Interesting. An attempt at "catch and kill". Mr. Ected Apr 2018 #12
Would have loved to have been a fly on THAT wall! WinstonSmith4740 Apr 2018 #52
Yep, me too. BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2018 #66
You're so right, syringis! And amazingly, Maddow has a PhD in poli sci rather than journalism. spooky3 Apr 2018 #6
Hi Spooky syringis Apr 2018 #16
Thank you for a phrase that I need to memorize for future use! spooky3 Apr 2018 #34
Hey syringis OnDoutside Apr 2018 #7
Hi OnDoutside syringis Apr 2018 #11
Great, and don't forget OnDoutside Apr 2018 #18
Stephen King and I both have a bit of a crush on her. Aristus Apr 2018 #8
That makes three of us blueinredohio Apr 2018 #61
Four, she is crush worthy, at least for those of us SonofDonald Apr 2018 #84
Au contraire.... GTurck Apr 2018 #78
An Eisenhower Republican is a lot more liberal than a lot of Democrats these days. Aristus Apr 2018 #82
Indeed. nt SunSeeker Apr 2018 #9
If Rachel doesn't receive a Pulitzer Prize ... FakeNoose Apr 2018 #10
I suspect it is, at least to some degree. sandensea Apr 2018 #14
Her show is an education in itself. sandensea Apr 2018 #13
I always feel watching her show is like auditing a master class. calimary Apr 2018 #32
Mahalo for Rachel, syringis.. Cha Apr 2018 #15
Hi Cha syringis Apr 2018 #19
Actually, you should have written Ms. PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2018 #20
Hi PoindexterOglethorpe syringis Apr 2018 #21
Hi, syringis, pardon me for butting in, but here are my two cents spooky3 Apr 2018 #30
I think (after 60+++ years and several marriages/relationships) that Mrs. is pretty archaic erronis Apr 2018 #31
Yes, that's it. PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2018 #45
Thank you :-) syringis Apr 2018 #47
I like that a lot. PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2018 #51
In some ways, it is just much easier to use one surname. If you have children together Ilsa Apr 2018 #71
"Husband" doesn't apply either Liberalagogo Apr 2018 #49
I remember when I was a kid, that asking to be called "Ms" was akin to burning your bra! Lisa0825 Apr 2018 #24
Actually I think "Ms" would Cha Apr 2018 #28
She's Dr. Madddow greymattermom Apr 2018 #29
Oh that's right! Thank for the Cha Apr 2018 #33
Yes and No malaise Apr 2018 #62
No, Dr. is correct. Alpeduez21 Apr 2018 #73
What about when she teased having Trump's tax returns? oberliner Apr 2018 #17
Really? I suppose one could say 'let it go', but I don't think you want to. poboy2 Apr 2018 #23
I watch her every night and always look forward to her show oberliner Apr 2018 #25
It Was Theater Roy Rolling Apr 2018 #35
I know, right.. there always Cha Apr 2018 #37
Someone. tavernier Apr 2018 #69
Not always the Cha Apr 2018 #70
Great minds, lol! tavernier Apr 2018 #72
Rachel (and Lawrence) is available on podcast. longship Apr 2018 #22
I listen to her podcast in the morning walking my dog. flygal Apr 2018 #26
Why does someone from Belgium spend time on a website devoted to US politics? oberliner Apr 2018 #27
I would turn your question on its head - why are the "americans" (US) so uninterested erronis Apr 2018 #39
How many Americans can name the prime minister of Belgium? oberliner Apr 2018 #54
Agree. I'm a zero too. Back to class! erronis Apr 2018 #63
Maybe b/c the US is a BFD? irisblue Apr 2018 #44
Yeah, what you said, Irisblue Cha Apr 2018 #48
All the more embarrassing oberliner Apr 2018 #55
Yep. We stand shamed before history & time by trump. irisblue Apr 2018 #56
Much like during the Bush years oberliner Apr 2018 #57
What happens in the USA often directly affects other countries DFW Apr 2018 #67
Technically, I believe Dr. Rachel Maddow is most appropriate given her doctorate (n/t) FreepFryer Apr 2018 #36
You're right.. I was thinking Ms but Cha Apr 2018 #40
Rhodes scholar; Oxford doctorate. maddiemom Apr 2018 #43
Cheers! A doctorate is obviously a huge challenge for anyone... FreepFryer Apr 2018 #50
Cheers to that, FreepFryer! Cha Apr 2018 #64
Pulitzer from me cp Apr 2018 #38
Yeah for Rachel Gothmog Apr 2018 #41
Wonderful compliment to her! Was just about to mention that it's properly Dr. Maddow maddiemom Apr 2018 #42
Thank you, syringis! Cha Apr 2018 #46
I second that emotion! Thank Goodness for Rachel! She 'splains it like I'm a 4 yr old. nt Honeycombe8 Apr 2018 #53
I never find clean links to her show on youtube but she podcasts video and audio versions. mahina Apr 2018 #59
Agreed! Big fan of Rachel Maddow, DPhil FailureToCommunicate Apr 2018 #60
Missed Rachel last night. Does not look like there will be a repeat helpisontheway Apr 2018 #68
Kickin' with gusto! Faux pas Apr 2018 #81
My boyfriend has never been political.......... mrmpa Apr 2018 #83

Wounded Bear

(58,645 posts)
1. Yeah, what she said!
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 05:37 PM
Apr 2018

I keep forgetting that Ms Maddow married her partner.

Rachel is definitely the kind of journalist our country needs right now.



LittleGirl

(8,282 posts)
58. I can't find any reference to Rachel
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 07:53 PM
Apr 2018

getting married? Is she? She's been with her partner since '99 but I don't think they are married. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Wounded Bear

(58,645 posts)
65. You may be right...
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 10:23 PM
Apr 2018

I thought I remembered Rachel announcing something, but I don't see any when/where details.

No big deal, though. I generally don't follow the personal lives of celebs much.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
74. Well Rachel started her own kind of genre within journalism
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:00 PM
Apr 2018

Her style is unique as far as I can tell. She connects the dots in a method which is more like a History professor would do although even then she does it in a unique way. She sticks to facts, relies heavily on the process of history, presenting it as a developing narrative rather than as snapshots of events. She tells a story with a beginning, middle and open ended ending.

She doesn’t present herself as an objective journalist weighing both or multiple sides of the news, but does present herself as telling facts.

I don’t think we’ve seen anything like it before.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
77. Well done with this description. Some find her method of taking 12 minutes to
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:38 PM
Apr 2018

get to the point to be frustrating but those 12 minutes are the important part, not the so called punch line.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
79. I think most people are still expecting to hear what happens rather
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:53 PM
Apr 2018

Than why and how it happens.

For me she fulfills my desire to see the connected dots so it can all be put into perspective with what I already know. History is a constantly developing narrative of real life. Some things fade into the background and are forgotten, but many times something comes along to bring the background back into focus.

Perhaps most people would understand the importance of those 12 minutes if they understood that it’s what she does. That she’s showing us the how and the why these things happen.

WinstonSmith4740

(3,056 posts)
52. Would have loved to have been a fly on THAT wall!
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 07:34 PM
Apr 2018

Just picturing Roger Ailes turning red and sputtering when he figured out that real patriots can't be bought gives me the warm fuzzy's. He must have instinctively known that she could bring down his lousy lie machine.

spooky3

(34,438 posts)
6. You're so right, syringis! And amazingly, Maddow has a PhD in poli sci rather than journalism.
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 05:47 PM
Apr 2018

She is so smart and so skillful she can handle anything!

(I really like Ari Melber and Lawrence O'Donnell as well. And just about everyone else at MSNBC (except the right wingers)).

syringis

(5,101 posts)
16. Hi Spooky
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:01 PM
Apr 2018

Waow ! Une tête bien faite et bien pleine ! ( Well-formed and well-filled mind)

I will look for Ari Melber and Lawrence O'Donnell.


OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
7. Hey syringis
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 05:49 PM
Apr 2018

go into www.tunein.com and you can listen to her show as a podcast. It's usually on tunein by 7am each day.

OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
18. Great, and don't forget
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:04 PM
Apr 2018

the android mobdro app for live msnbc on your android phone/tablet if you have them.

Also, you can put a build on Kodi where you can also access msnbc, maybe even recordings of Rachel's program (I'd need to check that). In any case if you need help, pm me.

Aristus

(66,316 posts)
8. Stephen King and I both have a bit of a crush on her.
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 05:51 PM
Apr 2018

Smart, liberal, and lovely. What's not to adore?



SonofDonald

(2,050 posts)
84. Four, she is crush worthy, at least for those of us
Sun Apr 15, 2018, 12:45 PM
Apr 2018

Who don't have "issues" already programmed via stupidity.

I'd be proud to walk down the street with her as her arm candy.

I'd be honored.

GTurck

(826 posts)
78. Au contraire....
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:45 PM
Apr 2018

Maddow has stated that she is more of an Eisenhower Republican. That faction no longer exists having been run out of the party by the right-wingers.

calimary

(81,212 posts)
32. I always feel watching her show is like auditing a master class.
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:28 PM
Apr 2018

She connects dots and provides rich context to big stories - better than anyone else in the business. I always appreciate the way she backs into a lead.

syringis

(5,101 posts)
19. Hi Cha
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:08 PM
Apr 2018

I should have written "Miss".

Here, we do not anymore use "Miss" in formal language. The word is only used for very young women.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,841 posts)
20. Actually, you should have written Ms.
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:11 PM
Apr 2018

because that's the normal form of address of a woman in this country. Miss is likewise mostly used for very young women. But Mrs is not extended as a courtesy title to unmarried women. And even if Ms. Maddow marries her partner, she will likely not change her name and remain Ms. Maddow.

syringis

(5,101 posts)
21. Hi PoindexterOglethorpe
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:16 PM
Apr 2018

Thank you, I've learned something today.

I'll remember it. I'll edit my OP too.

So "Mrs" is used when a woman is married and bears her husband's name ?

spooky3

(34,438 posts)
30. Hi, syringis, pardon me for butting in, but here are my two cents
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:27 PM
Apr 2018

the term "Ms." is preferred and widely used here, primarily because, just as the term "Mr." is used regardless of marital status, "Ms." works regardless. And, to many people, it seems less sexist than Miss/Mrs., because it doesn't treat women different from men or seem to define women by their attachment/no attachment to (usually) a man. However, if a woman tells someone that she prefers a different form of address, such as Mrs. Husband's Name, then the polite thing here is to do as she asks.

erronis

(15,241 posts)
31. I think (after 60+++ years and several marriages/relationships) that Mrs. is pretty archaic
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:28 PM
Apr 2018

Of course there are those in France that want to be addressed as Madame (Mme) but we're slowly losing the gender-specific honorifics that try to show sex/age/marriagiability all in 2-3 letters.

Best to just call them by their names - given or professional.

Or as Christine Lavin put it: Never Call Your Sweetheart By His Name:
http://www.christinelavin.com/index.php?page=songs&category=Future_Fossils&display=301



PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,841 posts)
45. Yes, that's it.
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:58 PM
Apr 2018

For a very long time married women were known as Mrs his first name his last name, as in Mrs John Smith. Up into the 1970's it occurred almost all the time, and you'd have no clue what Mrs Smith's given name was. After a while that changed and the same woman would be known as Mrs Jane Smith.

Starting in the 1970s the marital status neutral address of Ms came into usage.

I am one woman who never did change my last name when I was married (I'm sure you can guess Poindexter Oglethorpe is not my real name) and I honestly find it very strange that so many women continue to change their surnames upon marriage.

syringis

(5,101 posts)
47. Thank you :-)
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 07:04 PM
Apr 2018

A married woman keep her name here. It is mandatory since the 70s, if I'm not wrong. The husband's name is now used only informally.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,841 posts)
51. I like that a lot.
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 07:33 PM
Apr 2018

I find myself trying to convince young women here that not changing their name is vastly easier than changing, especially as these days you get a lot of grief if every single piece of official or semi-official paperwork doesn't all have the same name on it.

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
71. In some ways, it is just much easier to use one surname. If you have children together
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 08:06 AM
Apr 2018

living in the US, especially if you have kids in school, it is less confusing. And kids in US usually have their father's last name on their birth certificate, so the mom/wife would be the person without the same last name. Culture in the US has made it easier to propagate this tradition.

I think it is interesting that they only choose his name and not hers. Why not pick a new surname? Women can do that when they divorce in Texas.

Lisa0825

(14,487 posts)
24. I remember when I was a kid, that asking to be called "Ms" was akin to burning your bra!
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:18 PM
Apr 2018

So glad people got over it. As a single/divorced person, I hate it when people assume I am married.

No offense to the OP - cultural/language differences are a different matter. I only get annoyed with those who should know better.

Cha

(297,137 posts)
28. Actually I think "Ms" would
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:22 PM
Apr 2018

be the more correct wording here.

Or just Rachel Maddow.. but Mrs means she has a husband or had a husband.. and she has a girlfriend, Susan Mikula, for about 19 years.

Happy lesbian couple, Susan Mikula and Rachel Maddow are together since 1999 but are still not in hurry to get married!!

https://marriedbiography.com/happy-lesbian-couple-susan-mikula-rachel-maddow-together-since-1999-still-not-hurry-get-married/



ETA.. I just got corrected.. Rachel is a Dr.. so Dr Rachel Maddow would be the best way to addess her.

Alpeduez21

(1,751 posts)
73. No, Dr. is correct.
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 08:29 AM
Apr 2018

My wife and I should be addressed as Mr. and Dr. or, more properly, Dr. and Mr.

 

poboy2

(2,078 posts)
23. Really? I suppose one could say 'let it go', but I don't think you want to.
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:17 PM
Apr 2018

It was semi-hyped for about a half a day. But maybe that has done permanent damage to your psyche.

I feel your pain and anguish. They say time heals all wounds. Not long enough for you apparently.
I can only hope you can forgive this mortal transgression in years to come.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
25. I watch her every night and always look forward to her show
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:19 PM
Apr 2018

In fact, I am always really sad when she isn't on and there is a substitute.

No one is better at what she does than she is.

That's why I was so disappointed with the tax return tease - and I still feel that was a low-light for her.

Roy Rolling

(6,911 posts)
35. It Was Theater
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:32 PM
Apr 2018

She thought it would be good journalism, I'm sure she learned it wasn't. I don't like 100% of what I, myself, do much less liking 100% of another person's actions.

So I give Rachel the benefit of the doubt, her judgement on what to broadcast is not subject to my approval. I watch almost every show, too, and never think of the tax show. Mainly because the "controversy" was hyped by the right-wing, and THAT is what I ignore automatically.

Cha

(297,137 posts)
37. I know, right.. there always
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:35 PM
Apr 2018

has to be someone, who gets on a thread celebrating a person who has done so much good but isn't perfect.. with "Whataboutism".

Bad Rachel! lol

longship

(40,416 posts)
22. Rachel (and Lawrence) is available on podcast.
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:17 PM
Apr 2018

I grab the audio-only version every night. It's usually available some time after 11PM ET, one hour after her show closes. Same with Lawrence O'Donnell's Last Word, about one hour after he finishes.

Just point a podcast aggregator towards Rachel Maddow and you'll find her program. There might even be a video version, too. The same with Lawrence's show.

I get to listen to every one of her programs that way.

My best to you.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
27. Why does someone from Belgium spend time on a website devoted to US politics?
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:20 PM
Apr 2018

Just curious to know what drew you to DU.

erronis

(15,241 posts)
39. I would turn your question on its head - why are the "americans" (US) so uninterested
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:41 PM
Apr 2018

In what's happening in the rest of the world?

I think it is very natural to wonder what's happening in what used to be one of the leading countries of the world. Especially since the spill-over effects are so powerful to the rest of the world.

Looking at a map of Europe (Western and Eastern) it is easy to see that countries are quite small compared to the US. And that there is a lot of commingled history and problems and solutions.

I wish that the USofA would consider itself more of that community than a monolithic block of "americans" that can deal with everything on their own - or at least on their own terms.

irisblue

(32,967 posts)
44. Maybe b/c the US is a BFD?
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:56 PM
Apr 2018

enjoy & celebrate the fact that a well educated & alert European woman wants to hang out with us.

DFW

(54,341 posts)
67. What happens in the USA often directly affects other countries
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 01:35 AM
Apr 2018

Way more than they affect us, as a matter of fact.

Belgium has a population of just over 11 million. NATO HQ is there and so is that of the EU. Many thousands of Americans are stationed there, both military and civilian. America brings disproportionate billions into the Belgian economy. What goes on in the USA politically is (or should) be of major interest to most Belgians.

On the other hand, if we decide that our cravings for waffles and chocolate need to be satisfied elsewhere, it can be arranged. Theiplomat Belgians have a good reason to care.

As for us, an Indian diplomat once said that the office of President of the United States is FAR too important to be left to the voters of the United States.

Cha

(297,137 posts)
40. You're right.. I was thinking Ms but
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:41 PM
Apr 2018

reminded upthread that Rachel Maddow is a doctor!

snip//

Maddow received a bachelor’s degree in public policy from Stanford University. She earned her doctorate in political science at Oxford University, which she attended on a Rhodes Scholarship. She lives in New York City and Massachusetts with her partner, artist Susan Mikula.

http://www.msnbc.com/the-rachel-maddow-show/rachel-maddow-biography

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
43. Rhodes scholar; Oxford doctorate.
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 06:54 PM
Apr 2018

Tell us ,Sean Hannity...where,again, did you get your bachelors" degree?

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
50. Cheers! A doctorate is obviously a huge challenge for anyone...
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 07:27 PM
Apr 2018

...even putting aside (if only) the huge and deepening gender disparities in academia.

mahina

(17,643 posts)
59. I never find clean links to her show on youtube but she podcasts video and audio versions.
Fri Apr 13, 2018, 08:04 PM
Apr 2018

Also available on msnbc.com

I agree completely with your support of her though.

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
83. My boyfriend has never been political..........
Sat Apr 14, 2018, 05:03 PM
Apr 2018

he is a widow and she was a staunch republican and I think he never gave it much thought as to who was running for what seat, etc.

I started putting on Rachel's show every night. He is in love with her, because as he said "she connects the dots, and makes it easy to understand what's going on."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thank you Dr Rachel Maddo...