Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Cannot Do Job of Commander in Chief
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2018/4/23/121024/288Trump Cannot Do Job of Commander in Chief
by BooMan
Mon Apr 23rd, 2018 at 12:10:24 PM EST
snip//
Theres one more part of Patrick Radden Keefes piece that I want to share with you. Its on the subject of how the National Security Strategy paper was crafted last year under McMasters guidance. There are a variety of things you can take away from this excerpt, none of them good in my estimation.
In December, the White House unveiled its National Security Strategy, a sixty-eight-page document in which the N.S.C. staff laid out Trumps official view of the world. McMasters aides proudly claimed that this was the first time a national-security-strategy document had been published within the first year of a Presidential Administration. The document had conspicuously Trumpian lacunae; there were no references to climate change as a national-security threat, for example. But it seemed to be an effort to domesticate some of Trumps bellicose rhetoric, emphasizing the importance of competition among the great powers but also of American leadership. Trump had mocked NATO as obsolete; the document described the alliance as one of our greatest advantages. It explicitly named Russia and China as malign influences, and declared that the Russians had used technology to undermine the legitimacy of democracies. Such language was in sharp contrast with Trumps strenuous avoidance of blaming the Kremlin for election interference. An N.S.C. official told me, The fundamental question is, can you divorce Presidential rhetoric from American foreign policy?
Composing the document was a challenge, because Trump did not have many concrete views on foreign policy beyond bumper-sticker sentiments like America first. When McMaster requested Trumps input, the President grew frustrated and defensive, as if hed been ambushed with a pop quiz. So staffers adopted Trumps broad ideal of American competitiveness and tried to extrapolate which policies he might favor in specific instances. McMaster touted the resulting document as highly readable, and as a text it seems reassuringly plausible. But nobody on McMasters staff could confirm for me with any conviction that the President himself had read it.
Composing the document was a challenge, because Trump did not have many concrete views on foreign policy beyond bumper-sticker sentiments like America first. When McMaster requested Trumps input, the President grew frustrated and defensive, as if hed been ambushed with a pop quiz. So staffers adopted Trumps broad ideal of American competitiveness and tried to extrapolate which policies he might favor in specific instances. McMaster touted the resulting document as highly readable, and as a text it seems reassuringly plausible. But nobody on McMasters staff could confirm for me with any conviction that the President himself had read it.
What sticks with me is the image of McMaster coming to the president to get his input on what should be in the nations statement of national security policy and discovering that hes just making Trump feel stupid and defensive and inadequate, like hes been given a pop quiz for which he hasnt prepared.
Its related to Trumps anger at being provided reading materials, like its unwanted homework or asking a fourth grader to do trigonometry before hes allowed to play with his Xbox.
Its not just that Trump cannot perform the duties of commander in chief. He doesnt want to even make an effort to fulfill those duties. When confronted with them, he is apparently is overcome with feelings of inadequacy that make him lash out or shut down.
And its not just that he cant consume or process a bare minimum of the information he needs to make decisions, but that he doesnt listen to the little information that does make its way into his brain. This is also obviously the case with his lawyers, but thats largely a problem confined to Trump and his future prospects of remaining president and out of prison. When his shortcomings involve our national security, its a problem for all of us and the people of every nation.
In the end, Trumps removal from office could be justified on the same kinds of grounds that forced Spiro Agnew out, which was basically corruption that preceded his run for federal office. Or it could be justified on the grounds that forced Nixon out, which was basically a break-in of the Democratic National Headquarters followed by a massive coverup. But its his inability to do the job of commander in chief that is really the primary reason he should be removed from office, and the reason his own cabinet should invoke the 25th Amendment.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1160 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Cannot Do Job of Commander in Chief (Original Post)
babylonsister
Apr 2018
OP
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)1. Not fit to serve as Commander-In-Chief.
Roll out the 25th Amendment!
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)2. The republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief* is unfit for duty
* aka Comrade Casino
Orsino
(37,428 posts)3. Counterpoint: the little that Trump can do has been redefined as the job of CinC.
Our military has been partially neutralized or hampered. This may be a good thing, with a twitchy Bolton eager to take it out for another spin.